Fiest Kirsten M, Krewulak Karla D, Sept Bonnie G, Davidson Judy E, Ely E Wesley, Lee Chel H, Soo Andrea, Stelfox Henry T
Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Department of Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Crit Care Explor. 2025 Aug 22;7(9):e1287. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001287. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.
Delirium remains frequently undetected by healthcare providers; partnering with family may be a novel way to identify and manage delirium. This study explores the feasibility of a family-administered intervention for delirium prevention, detection, and management.
Pilot randomized controlled trial.
Two Canadian ICUs.
Patient-family pairs (dyads) were included. Eligible patients had no primary brain injury, a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score of greater than or equal to -3, and were expected to remain in the ICU for at least 24 hours to complete all study assessments.
Dyads were randomly assigned to either standard care (control) or the intervention, which included delirium education and family-administered checklists with prevention/management strategies and a detection tool ("Sour Seven").
Outcomes included feasibility indicators, enrollment and completion rates, and psychological outcomes (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Kessler Psychologic Distress (K-10) scales in the ICU and at 1- and 3-month follow-ups. Between January 2020 and June 2023, during the height of the COVID pandemic, 197 patient-family pairs were approached, with 64 (32%) consenting to participate; participation required both the patient and a family member. Despite recruitment challenges, 75% of families completed in-ICU questionnaires, and 38% completed all follow-ups. The family members in the intervention group demonstrated increased delirium knowledge compared with baseline delirium knowledge, and engagement in prevention strategies, with 8 of 19 (42%) family members identifying delirium using the Sour Seven. At the 3-month follow-up, seven family members showed significant anxiety, and five showed significant depression. Observations of ICU rounds revealed limited delirium discussions.
This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of family-administered delirium care in ICU settings. However, the likely impact of the COVID-19 pandemic cannot be overlooked. The study faced recruitment challenges and demonstrated the difficulties of family involvement in delirium care, particularly during restricted family presence. A full evaluation of effectiveness requires a hypothesis-testing trial with procedural adjustments to streamline data collection and strengthen family-care team partnerships.
Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04099472).
目的 背景:医疗保健人员常常未能及时发现谵妄;与家属合作可能是识别和管理谵妄的一种新方法。本研究探讨了由家属实施的谵妄预防、检测和管理干预措施的可行性。
试点随机对照试验。
加拿大的两个重症监护病房。
纳入患者-家属对(二元组)。符合条件的患者无原发性脑损伤,里士满躁动镇静量表评分大于或等于-3,预计在重症监护病房停留至少24小时以完成所有研究评估。
二元组被随机分配到标准护理组(对照组)或干预组,干预措施包括谵妄教育以及由家属填写的包含预防/管理策略和检测工具(“酸七”)的清单。
结果包括可行性指标、入组率和完成率,以及心理结果(重症监护病房、1个月和3个月随访时的广泛性焦虑障碍量表-7、患者健康问卷-9和凯斯勒心理困扰量表(K-10))。在2020年1月至2023年6月新冠疫情高峰期,共接触了197对患者-家属对,其中64对(32%)同意参与;参与要求患者和一名家属均参与。尽管存在招募挑战,但75%的家属完成了重症监护病房内问卷,38%完成了所有随访。与基线谵妄知识相比,干预组家属的谵妄知识有所增加,且参与了预防策略,19名家属中有8名(42%)使用“酸七”识别出了谵妄。在3个月随访时,7名家属表现出明显焦虑,5名表现出明显抑郁。对重症监护病房查房的观察显示,谵妄相关讨论有限。
这项试点研究证明了在重症监护病房由家属实施谵妄护理的可行性。然而,新冠疫情的潜在影响不可忽视。该研究面临招募挑战,显示出家属参与谵妄护理的困难,尤其是在家属探视受限期间。对有效性的全面评估需要进行假设检验试验,并调整程序以简化数据收集并加强家属-护理团队合作。
Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04099472)