• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严肃认真以及自我诱发的呼吸变化对顶叶脑电图的影响。

Serious-mindedness and the effect of self-induced respiratory changes upon parietal EEG.

作者信息

Svebak S

出版信息

Biofeedback Self Regul. 1985 Mar;10(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00998677.

DOI:10.1007/BF00998677
PMID:4084614
Abstract

The role of serious-mindedness (so-called telic dominance) in regulation of parietal cortex EEG was investigated. Ten telic (serious-minded) and 10 paratelic (playful state-dominant) individuals were selected on the basis of their responses to the Telic Dominance Scale. They all performed instructed breathholding (hypopnea) and excessive breathing (hyperpnea) in counterbalanced order. The paratelic individuals yielded relatively high scores of integral EEG power; theta power was markedly increased in the left hemisphere during hyperpnea, and reduced in the right hemisphere during hypopnea. Both hyperpnea and hypopnea were reported to be more aversive to the paratelic than to the telic subjects, but no group difference in respiratory activity was found. The electrocortical and hedonic tone differences between the groups are discussed in relation to the distinction between the prefrontal (dopamine) activation pathway and frontoparietal (noradrenalin) arousal pathway, as well as in relation to changes in cortical blood flow and proprioceptive feedback.

摘要

研究了认真态度(所谓的目的导向优势)在顶叶皮质脑电图调节中的作用。根据对目的导向优势量表的反应,选取了10名目的导向型(认真态度)个体和10名旁目的导向型(游戏状态主导)个体。他们均按照平衡顺序进行了指令性屏气(呼吸浅慢)和过度呼吸(呼吸急促)。旁目的导向型个体的脑电图总功率得分相对较高;呼吸急促时左半球的θ波功率显著增加,呼吸浅慢时右半球的θ波功率降低。据报道,呼吸急促和呼吸浅慢对旁目的导向型个体比对目的导向型个体更具厌恶感,但未发现两组在呼吸活动上存在差异。结合前额叶(多巴胺)激活通路和额顶叶(去甲肾上腺素)唤醒通路之间的区别,以及皮质血流和本体感觉反馈的变化,讨论了两组之间的电皮质和享乐基调差异。

相似文献

1
Serious-mindedness and the effect of self-induced respiratory changes upon parietal EEG.严肃认真以及自我诱发的呼吸变化对顶叶脑电图的影响。
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1985 Mar;10(1):49-62. doi: 10.1007/BF00998677.
2
Metamotivational state and dominance: Links with EMG gradients during isokinetic leg extension and a test of the misfit effect.多动激励状态和优势:等速腿部伸展时肌电梯度的关系以及不匹配效应的检验。
J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(4):403-10. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.537673.
3
Effects of smoking and telic/paratelic dominance on the contingent negative variation (CNV).吸烟及目的/旁目的优势对关联性负变(CNV)的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 1996 Aug-Sep;23(1-2):101-10. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(96)00043-8.
4
Smoking and EEG power spectra: effects of differences in arousal seeking.吸烟与脑电图功率谱:寻求刺激差异的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 1995 Apr;19(3):247-56. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(95)00016-l.
5
Stress responses during aerobic exercise in relation to motivational dominance and state.有氧运动期间的应激反应与动机优势和状态有关。
J Sports Sci. 2011 Feb;29(3):299-306. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.534808.
6
Telic-Paratelic Dominance and Heart Rate Variability in Athletes Engaged in Power and Endurance Training.动力性与耐力性训练对运动员心搏量变异度和目的-取向性的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Jun;131(3):861-875. doi: 10.1177/00315125241237045. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Effects on archery performance of manipulating metamotivational state and felt arousal.操控元动机状态和感知唤醒对射箭表现的影响。
Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Jun;84(3 Pt 1):819-28. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3.819.
8
Cardiac and somatic activation in the continuous perceptual-motor task: the significance of threat and serious-mindedness.持续感知运动任务中的心脏和躯体激活:威胁与认真态度的重要性。
Int J Psychophysiol. 1986 Jan;3(3):155-62. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(86)90024-3.
9
Motivational dominance in psychopaths.
Br J Clin Psychol. 1988 May;27(2):153-8. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00763.x.
10
Functional frontoparietal connectivity during encoding and retrieval processes follows HERA model. A high-resolution study.编码和检索过程中的功能性额顶叶连接遵循HERA模型。一项高分辨率研究。
Brain Res Bull. 2006 Jan 15;68(4):203-12. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.04.019. Epub 2005 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Consequences of Laughter Upon Trunk Compression and Cortical Activation: Linear and Polynomial Relations.笑对躯干压迫和皮质激活的影响:线性和多项式关系。
Eur J Psychol. 2016 Aug 19;12(3):456-72. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i3.1102. eCollection 2016 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
VOLUNTARY BREATHHOLDING. III. THE RELATION OF THE MAXIMUM TIME OF BREATHHOLDING TO THE OXYGEN AND CARBON DIOXIDE TENSIONS OF ARTERIAL BLOOD, WITH A NOTE ON ITS CLINICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE.自主屏气。III. 屏气最长时间与动脉血氧分压和二氧化碳分压的关系,并附其临床及生理意义说明。
J Clin Invest. 1946 Sep;25(5):734-43. doi: 10.1172/JCI101757.
2
The development of the Telic Dominance Scale.
J Pers Assess. 1978 Oct;42(5):519-28. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4205_14.
3
High arousal can be pleasant and exciting. The theory of psychological reversals.高度唤醒状态可能是愉悦且令人兴奋的。心理逆转理论。
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1980 Dec;5(4):439-44. doi: 10.1007/BF01001359.
4
The effect of task difficulty and threat of aversive electric shock upon tonic physiological changes.
Biol Psychol. 1982 Feb-Mar;14(1-2):113-28. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(82)90019-9.
5
Human sinus arrhythmia as an index of vagal cardiac outflow.人体窦性心律不齐作为迷走神经心脏传出的指标。
J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Apr;54(4):961-6. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.4.961.
6
The effects of hyperventilation; individual variability and its relation to personality.过度通气的影响;个体差异及其与人格的关系。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1982 Mar;13(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(82)90034-9.
7
Hyperventilation and anxiety state.换气过度与焦虑状态。
J R Soc Med. 1981 Jan;74(1):1-4. doi: 10.1177/014107688107400101.
8
Assessment of parasympathetic control of heart rate by a noninvasive method.一种非侵入性方法对心率的副交感神经控制评估。
Am J Physiol. 1984 Jun;246(6 Pt 2):H838-42. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1984.246.6.H838.
9
Concordance among self-regulated responses: is self-regulatory ability a psychophysiological "trait"?
Biofeedback Self Regul. 1983 Sep;8(3):351-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00998745.
10
Hyperventilation: its relation to symptom experience and to anxiety.过度换气:其与症状体验及焦虑的关系。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1983 Nov;92(4):422-32. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.92.4.422.