• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨折家族史与骨折风险:一项更新FRAX®风险评估工具的荟萃分析

Family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update the FRAX® risk assessment tool.

作者信息

McCloskey Eugene V, Johansson Helena, Liu Enwu, Åkesson Kristina E, Anderson Fred A, Azagra-Ledesma Rafael, Bager Cecilie L, Beaudart Charlotte, Bischoff-Ferrari Heike A, Biver Emmanuel, Bruyère Olivier, Cauley Jane A, Center Jacqueline R, Chapurlat Roland, Christiansen Claus, Cooper Cyrus, Crandall Carolyn J, Cummings Steven R, da Silva José A P, Dawson-Hughes Bess, Diez-Perez Adolfo, Dufour Alyssa B, Eisman John A, Elders Petra J M, Ferrari Serge, Fujita Yuki, Fujiwara Saeko, Glüer Claus-Christian, Goldshtein Inbal, Goltzman David, Gudnason Vilmundur, Hall Jill, Hans Didier, Hoff Mari, Hollick Rosemary J, Huisman Martijn, Iki Masayuki, Ish-Shalom Sophia, Jones Graeme, Karlsson Magnus K, Khosla Sundeep, Kiel Douglas P, Koh Woon-Puay, Koromani Fjorda, Kotowicz Mark A, Kröger Heikki, Kwok Timothy, Lamy Olivier, Langhammer Arnulf, Larijani Bagher, Lippuner Kurt, Mellström Dan, McGuigan Fiona E A, Merlijn Thomas, Nguyen Tuan V, Nordström Anna, Nordström Peter, O Neill Terence W, Obermayer-Pietsch Barbara, Ohlsson Claes, Orwoll Eric S, Pasco Julie A, Rivadeneira Fernando, Schei Berit, Schott Anne-Marie, Shiroma Eric J, Siggeirsdottir Kristin, Simonsick Eleanor M, Sornay-Rendu Elisabeth, Sund Reijo, Swart Karin M A, Szulc Pawel, Tamaki Junko, Torgerson David J, van Schoor Natasja M, van Staa Tjeerd P, Vila Joan, Wareham Nicholas J, Wright Nicole C, Yoshimura Noriko, Zillikens M Carola, Zwart Marta, Schini Marian, Vandenput Liesbeth, Harvey Nicholas C, Lorentzon Mattias, Leslie William D, Kanis John A

机构信息

Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine & Population Health, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07607-w.

DOI:10.1007/s00198-025-07607-w
PMID:40848065
Abstract

UNLABELLED

In the largest meta-analysis of international cohorts to date, a family history of fracture is confirmed as a significant BMD-independent predictor of future fracture risk. Parental and sibling histories of fracture carry the same significance for future fracture, including the impact of family hip fracture on future hip fracture risk.

PURPOSE

We have undertaken a meta-analysis of international prospective cohorts to quantify the relationship between a family history of fracture and future fracture incidence.

METHODS

The analysis dataset comprised 350,542 men and women from 42 cohorts in 29 countries followed for 2.8 million person-years. We investigated the relationship between family history of hip fracture or any fracture and the risk of any clinical fracture, any osteoporotic fracture, major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and hip fracture alone using an extended Poisson model in each cohort. Models were adjusted for current age, sex, BMD, and follow-up time.

RESULTS

As no difference in influence of family history of fracture was seen between genders, results are presented for men and women combined. A parental history of hip fracture was associated with a higher risk of incident fracture across all fracture outcome categories, with a stronger relationship with future hip fracture (hazard ratios (HR, 95% CI) for hip and MOF 1.37, 1.23-1.52 and 1.19, 1.12-1.27, respectively). Associations were slightly reduced but remained significant when additionally adjusted for BMD and did not vary by baseline offspring age, follow-up time, or parent affected. In a more limited analysis, parental history of any fracture or a sibling history of hip or any fracture showed similar associations to those observed with parental history of hip fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

A family history of fracture is confirmed as a significant BMD-independent predictor of future fracture risk. While parental hip fracture appears the strongest factor for future hip fracture, a family history of other fractures might be appropriate for inclusion in future iterations of the FRAX tool.

摘要

未标注

在迄今为止最大规模的国际队列荟萃分析中,骨折家族史被确认为未来骨折风险的一个重要的、与骨密度无关的预测因素。父母和兄弟姐妹的骨折史对未来骨折具有同样的重要性,包括家族髋部骨折对未来髋部骨折风险的影响。

目的

我们对国际前瞻性队列进行了荟萃分析,以量化骨折家族史与未来骨折发生率之间的关系。

方法

分析数据集包括来自29个国家42个队列的350,542名男性和女性,随访时间达280万人年。我们在每个队列中使用扩展泊松模型研究髋部骨折或任何骨折的家族史与任何临床骨折、任何骨质疏松性骨折、主要骨质疏松性骨折(MOF)以及单独髋部骨折风险之间的关系。模型对当前年龄、性别、骨密度和随访时间进行了调整。

结果

由于未发现骨折家族史对男女的影响存在差异,因此给出了男女合并的结果。父母有髋部骨折史与所有骨折结局类别中骨折发生风险较高相关,与未来髋部骨折的关系更强(髋部骨折和MOF的风险比(HR,95%CI)分别为1.37,1.23 - 1.52和1.19,1.12 - 1.27)。在额外调整骨密度后,关联略有降低但仍显著,且不因基线后代年龄、随访时间或受影响的父母而有所不同。在一项更有限的分析中,父母有任何骨折史或兄弟姐妹有髋部或任何骨折史与父母有髋部骨折史所观察到的关联相似。

结论

骨折家族史被确认为未来骨折风险的一个重要的、与骨密度无关的预测因素。虽然父母髋部骨折似乎是未来髋部骨折的最强因素,但其他骨折的家族史可能适合纳入FRAX工具的未来版本中。

相似文献

1
Family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update the FRAX® risk assessment tool.骨折家族史与骨折风险:一项更新FRAX®风险评估工具的荟萃分析
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Aug 23. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07607-w.
2
Previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.既往骨折与后续骨折风险:更新 FRAX 的荟萃分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2023 Dec;34(12):2027-2045. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06870-z. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.糖皮质激素性骨质疏松症:一项系统评价与成本效用分析
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(7):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-231. doi: 10.3310/hta11070.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人髋关节囊外骨折的手术干预:一项网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 10;2(2):CD013405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013405.pub2.
7
Geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor for fragility fracture risk in elderly with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 9-year ambispective longitudinal cohort study.老年营养风险指数作为2型糖尿病老年人脆性骨折风险的预测指标:一项9年的双向纵向队列研究
Clin Nutr. 2024 May;43(5):1125-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.03.032. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
8
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
9
A systematic review and economic evaluation of bisphosphonates for the prevention of fragility fractures.双膦酸盐类药物预防脆性骨折的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Oct;20(78):1-406. doi: 10.3310/hta20780.
10
Biases in the performance of FRAX without BMD in predicting fracture risk in a multiethnic population with diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study.在多民族糖尿病患者群体中,不使用骨密度的FRAX在预测骨折风险时的偏差:糖尿病与衰老研究
J Bone Miner Res. 2025 Apr 21;40(4):478-491. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjaf012.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' preferences for fracture risk communication: the Risk Communication in Osteoporosis (RICO) study.患者对骨折风险沟通的偏好:骨质疏松症风险沟通(RICO)研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2024 Mar;35(3):451-468. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06955-9. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
2
A saturated map of common genetic variants associated with human height.与人类身高相关的常见遗传变异的饱和图谱。
Nature. 2022 Oct;610(7933):704-712. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05275-y. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
3
Is it time to consider population screening for fracture risk in postmenopausal women? A position paper from the International Osteoporosis Foundation Epidemiology/Quality of Life Working Group.
是否到了考虑对绝经后妇女进行骨折风险人群筛查的时候了?国际骨质疏松基金会流行病学/生活质量工作组的立场文件。
Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Jun 28;17(1):87. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01117-6.
4
Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX: a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan.骨折风险预测工具FRAX的更新:对潜在队列的系统评价及分析计划
Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2103-2136. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06435-6. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Risk of Subsequent Fractures in Postmenopausal Women After Nontraumatic vs Traumatic Fractures.绝经后妇女非外伤性与外伤性骨折后再次骨折的风险。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Aug 1;181(8):1055-1063. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2617.
6
Phenotypic covariance across the entire spectrum of relatedness for 86 billion pairs of individuals.860 亿对个体间全相关谱的表型协方差。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 16;12(1):1050. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21283-4.
7
Underevaluation of fractures by self-report: an analysis from the FRISBEE cohort.自我报告中骨折的低估:来自 FRISBEE 队列的分析。
Arch Osteoporos. 2020 Apr 22;15(1):61. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00739-y.
8
Fracture risk following high-trauma versus low-trauma fracture: a registry-based cohort study.高创伤性骨折与低创伤性骨折后的骨折风险:基于登记的队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jun;31(6):1059-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05274-2. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
9
The genetic architecture of osteoporosis and fracture risk.骨质疏松症和骨折风险的遗传结构。
Bone. 2019 Sep;126:2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
10
Longevity defined as top 10% survivors and beyond is transmitted as a quantitative genetic trait.长寿定义为前 10%的幸存者及以上,是作为一种数量遗传特征进行传递的。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 7;10(1):35. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07925-0.