• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳香属植物的质体基因组结构、进化与多样性

Plastome structure, evolution and diversity of Frankincense-producing Boswellia genus.

作者信息

Asaf Sajjad, Williams Yetunde A, Riethoven Jean-Jack M, Eslamieh Jason, Al-Rawahi Ahmed, Al-Harrasi Ahmed, Khan Abdul Latif

机构信息

Natural and Medical Sciences Research Center, University of Nizwa, Nizwa, Sultanate of Oman.

Department of Engineering Technology, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Funct Integr Genomics. 2025 Aug 25;25(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s10142-025-01682-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10142-025-01682-2
PMID:40850985
Abstract

The genus Boswellia is famous for its commercially important frankincense production. Additionally, it has unique ecological and taxonomic importance. However, the Boswellia species often face natural hybridization, and the lack of genomic datasets frequently contributes to taxonomic uncertainties. Here, we sequenced and analyzed the complete plastid genomes (plastomes) of six Boswellia species (B. carteri, B. bullata, B. dioscoridis, B. elongata, B. serrata, B. frereana, and a hybrid variant of B. sacra (B. sacra var. supersacra). The genome size of Boswellia plastomes is between 159,189 bp and 160,743 bp, displaying a typical structure with large single-copy (LSC; 86,811-88,054), small single-copy (SSC; 26,666-26,763), and inverted repeat (IR; 26,544-26,763) regions. The IR regions (~ 25,000 bp) are highly conserved across species, contributing to the stability of the plastome structure. Our study identified consistent gene content, typical of angiosperms, and showed that the IR boundaries remained unchanged across species. The simple sequence repeats revealed a range between 43 and 52 across the plastomes, with B. sacra exhibiting the highest count. We detected long, repetitive sequences that could serve as useful genetic markers for species differentiation. Nucleotide diversity analysis highlighted significant gene variations (matK, rbcL, rpl14, and rpoC2). The results showed substantial genetic divergence in regions (rpl14, matK, and rpoC2), demonstrating distinct variations among species. In evolutionary history, the B. carteri diverged around 4.2 million years ago (mya), while B. sacra and B. serrata separated by approximately 7.0 mya. The phylogenomic analysis supported the distinction between B. carteri and B. sacra, challenging prior claims that these are synonymous. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of species boundaries within Boswellia and offer valuable resources for future DNA barcoding efforts.

摘要

乳香属以其具有重要商业价值的乳香生产而闻名。此外,它还具有独特的生态和分类学重要性。然而,乳香属物种经常面临自然杂交,并且缺乏基因组数据集常常导致分类学上的不确定性。在此,我们对六种乳香属物种(卡氏乳香、泡状乳香、迪氏乳香、长叶乳香、锯齿乳香、弗雷氏乳香以及一种神圣乳香的杂交变种(神圣乳香超神圣变种))的完整质体基因组(质体基因组)进行了测序和分析。乳香属质体基因组的大小在159,189碱基对至160,743碱基对之间,呈现出具有大单拷贝(LSC;86,811 - 88,054)、小单拷贝(SSC;26,666 - 26,763)和反向重复(IR;26,544 - 26,763)区域的典型结构。IR区域(约25,000碱基对)在物种间高度保守,有助于质体基因组结构的稳定性。我们的研究确定了与被子植物典型一致的基因内容,并表明IR边界在物种间保持不变。简单序列重复显示整个质体基因组的范围在43至52之间,神圣乳香的数量最多。我们检测到可作为物种分化有用遗传标记的长重复序列。核苷酸多样性分析突出了显著的基因变异(matK、rbcL、rpl14和rpoC2)。结果显示在区域(rpl14、matK和rpoC2)存在大量遗传分歧,表明物种间存在明显差异。在进化史上,卡氏乳香大约在420万年前分化,而神圣乳香和锯齿乳香大约在700万年前分开。系统发育基因组分析支持了卡氏乳香和神圣乳香之间的区别,对之前认为它们是同义词的说法提出了挑战。这些发现有助于更深入地理解乳香属内的物种界限,并为未来的DNA条形码研究提供有价值的资源。

相似文献

1
Plastome structure, evolution and diversity of Frankincense-producing Boswellia genus.乳香属植物的质体基因组结构、进化与多样性
Funct Integr Genomics. 2025 Aug 25;25(1):172. doi: 10.1007/s10142-025-01682-2.
2
The complete plastome of the Antarctic moss Andreaea regularis (Andreaeaceae) and its comparative analyses within Bryophyta.南极苔藓规则黑藓(黑藓科)的完整质体基因组及其在苔藓植物门内的比较分析。
BMC Genomics. 2025 Jul 15;26(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11854-w.
3
Phylogenomics and structural variations of plastid genomes of the columbine genus (Ranunculaceae).耧斗菜属(毛茛科)质体基因组的系统发育基因组学与结构变异
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Aug 20;25(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-07093-6.
4
Comparative genomics of plastid genome within Curculigo orchioides subclade (Hypoxidaceae) reveals evolutionary relationships and document the shortest ndhA intron in seed plants.仙茅亚分支(仙茅科)质体基因组的比较基因组学揭示了进化关系,并记录了种子植物中最短的ndhA内含子。
Planta. 2025 Aug 27;262(4):90. doi: 10.1007/s00425-025-04807-w.
5
Comparative analysis of 18 chloroplast genomes reveals genomic diversity and evolutionary dynamics in subtribe Malaxidinae (Orchidaceae).18个叶绿体基因组的比较分析揭示了沼兰亚族(兰科)的基因组多样性和进化动态。
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):1013. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06772-8.
6
Comparative plastome analysis reveals evolutionary dynamics and codon usage patterns in Bidens (Asteraceae).比较质体基因组分析揭示了鬼针草属(菊科)的进化动态和密码子使用模式。
Funct Integr Genomics. 2025 Aug 27;25(1):175. doi: 10.1007/s10142-025-01699-7.
7
The 2 Sigma Genus Concept in mammalogy: Lessons from Lasiurus.哺乳动物学中的双西格玛属概念:来自红蝙蝠属的经验教训。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0325554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325554. eCollection 2025.
8
Genome Skimming Reveals Plastome Conservation, Phylogenetic Structure, and Novel Molecular Markers in Valuable Orchid .基因组浅层测序揭示了珍贵兰花的质体基因组保守性、系统发育结构和新型分子标记
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jun 20;16(7):723. doi: 10.3390/genes16070723.
9
Comparative analysis of plastome structure in Sphagnum species from China.中国泥炭藓属植物质体基因组结构的比较分析。
BMC Genomics. 2025 Jul 1;26(1):585. doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11763-y.
10
Comparative Analysis of Plastomes of and Insights into the Infra-Generic Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Genus.[物种名称]质体基因组的比较分析及该属内属内系统发育关系的见解
Genes (Basel). 2025 May 29;16(6):659. doi: 10.3390/genes16060659.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome-wide simple sequence repeat analysis and specific molecular marker development of rye.黑麦基因组广泛简单重复序列分析及特异分子标记开发。
BMC Genomics. 2024 Aug 12;25(1):780. doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-10689-1.
2
Complete chloroplast genomes of three copal trees (Bursera: Bullockia): comparative analysis and phylogenetic relationships.三种胶乳树(Bursera:Bullockia)的完整叶绿体基因组:比较分析和系统发育关系。
Mol Biol Rep. 2024 Mar 9;51(1):406. doi: 10.1007/s11033-024-09304-z.
3
Comparative plastome genomics, taxonomic delimitation and evolutionary divergences of Tetraena hamiensis var. qatarensis and Tetraena simplex (Zygophyllaceae).
比较叶底珠属(四合木科)Tetraena hamiensis var. qatarensis 和 Tetraena simplex 的质体基因组学、分类学界限和进化分歧。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 8;13(1):7436. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34477-1.
4
Phylogenomic analyses of Sapindales support new family relationships, rapid Mid-Cretaceous Hothouse diversification, and heterogeneous histories of gene duplication.无患子目植物的系统基因组分析支持新的科间关系、白垩纪中期温室效应下的快速多样化以及基因复制的异质历史。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 7;14:1063174. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1063174. eCollection 2023.
5
The dynamic history of gymnosperm plastomes: Insights from structural characterization, comparative analysis, phylogenomics, and time divergence.裸子植物质体基因组的动态历史:结构特征、比较分析、系统基因组学和时间分歧的见解。
Plant Genome. 2021 Nov;14(3):e20130. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20130. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
6
Chloroplot: An Online Program for the Versatile Plotting of Organelle Genomes.Chloroplot:一个用于细胞器基因组多功能绘图的在线程序。
Front Genet. 2020 Sep 25;11:576124. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.576124. eCollection 2020.
7
Gene Loss and Evolution of the Plastome.基因缺失与质体的进化。
Genes (Basel). 2020 Sep 25;11(10):1133. doi: 10.3390/genes11101133.
8
Unraveling the Chloroplast Genomes of Two Species to Identify Its Genomic Information, Comparative Analyses and Phylogenetic Relationship.解析两个物种的叶绿体基因组,以鉴定其基因组信息、比较分析和系统发育关系。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 6;21(9):3280. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093280.
9
Chemical Composition and in Vitro Cytotoxic Screening of Sixteen Commercial Essential Oils on Five Cancer Cell Lines.十六种市售精油的化学成分及对五种癌细胞系的体外细胞毒性筛选
Chem Biodivers. 2020 Jan;17(1):e1900478. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.201900478. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
10
Development of high-resolution DNA barcodes for species discrimination and phylogenetic analysis.用于物种鉴定和系统发育分析的高分辨率DNA条形码的开发。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Aug 22;9(18):10843-10853. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5605. eCollection 2019 Sep.