Foote Beth, Lamers Femke, Xiao Mike, Cui Lihong, Zipunnikov Vadim, Husky Mathilde M, Merikangas Kathleen R
Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychol Med. 2025 Aug 26;55:e242. doi: 10.1017/S0033291725000121.
Although heightened anxiety associated with social interaction or evaluation is the core diagnostic criterion for social anxiety disorder (SAD), there is growing evidence that SAD is characterized by more pervasive reactivity beyond social situations. We employed Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to describe the affective dynamics and emotional reactivity to daily events in a community-based sample of adults with SAD compared with other anxiety disorders, and controls without anxiety or mood disorders.
A sample of 236 adults with a lifetime diagnosis of SAD (n = 53), other anxiety disorders (n = 120), and no mood or anxiety disorder (n = 63) based on comprehensive diagnostic interviews answered brief electronic interviews that assessed daily life events and mood and anxiety symptoms four times a day for two weeks. Linear mixed models were used to quantify reactivity to daily life events.
Persons with SAD had higher average levels of sad and anxious mood than those with other anxiety disorders or controls. Irrespective of comorbid mood disorders, people with SAD also demonstrated significantly greater decreases in both sad and anxious mood following positive events, and a greater increase in anxious mood following negative, particularly non-social events.
Our findings regarding pervasive reactivity beyond the social context in people with SAD confirm the need for broader conceptualization of this disorder as well as expansion of interventions beyond the social context. This work also demonstrates the utility of EMA as a powerful tool to track individual variability and reactivity in daily life that can inform etiology, treatment and prevention.
尽管与社交互动或评估相关的焦虑加剧是社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的核心诊断标准,但越来越多的证据表明,SAD的特征是在社交情境之外存在更普遍的反应性。我们采用生态瞬时评估(EMA)来描述与其他焦虑症以及无焦虑或情绪障碍的对照组相比,社区成年SAD样本对日常事件的情感动态和情绪反应。
基于全面诊断访谈,选取236名终生诊断为SAD(n = 53)、其他焦虑症(n = 120)以及无情绪或焦虑症(n = 63)的成年人样本,他们每天回答四次简短的电子访谈,评估两周内的日常生活事件、情绪和焦虑症状。使用线性混合模型量化对日常生活事件的反应性。
SAD患者的悲伤和焦虑情绪平均水平高于其他焦虑症患者或对照组。无论是否合并情绪障碍,SAD患者在积极事件后悲伤和焦虑情绪的下降幅度也显著更大,在消极事件(尤其是非社交事件)后焦虑情绪的增加幅度更大。
我们关于SAD患者在社交情境之外存在普遍反应性这一发现,证实了对该障碍进行更广泛概念化以及将干预措施扩展到社交情境之外的必要性。这项工作还证明了EMA作为一种强大工具在追踪日常生活中的个体变异性和反应性方面的效用,这可为病因学、治疗和预防提供信息。