Azgari Ecem, Özden İdil, Gökyar Merve, Öveçoğlu Hesna Sazak
Faculty of Dentistry Department of Endodontics, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Basibuyuk Road Marmara University, Health Campus 9/3, Maltepe, Istanbul, 34854, Turkey.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 26;25(1):1371. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06757-x.
The aim of this study is to analyze the residual organic film and debris on the surface of new endodontic files following different mechanical cleaning protocols.
Fifty new nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary instruments were used. Initial scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were obtained and debris amounts were scored between 0 and 3. Files were then divided into five groups, each subjected to a different cleaning protocol: 1. group: Autoclave sterilization without mechanical cleaning, 2.group: Ultrasonic cleaning, 3.group: Brushing and ultrasonic cleaning, 4.group: Cleaning with 0.2% chlorhexidine-impregnated sponge and ultrasonic cleaning, 5. group: Cleaning with 70% alcohol-impregnated gauze and ultrasonic cleaning. Post-cleaning Scanning Electron Microscope images were taken, and surface debris was re-scored. Data normality was assessed using visual (histogram, Q–Q plot) and statistical (Shapiro–Wilk test) methods. As the distribution was non-normal, non-parametric tests were used: the Fisher-Freeman-Halton test for intergroup comparisons and the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test for within-group comparisons.
According to the Fisher-Freeman-Halton test, a statistically significant difference was found between groups in terms of post-cleaning scores ( < 0.001). All groups except Group 1 showed a significant decrease in scores after cleaning. The Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test revealed statistically significant differences between pre- and post-cleaning scores in Groups 2, 3, 4, and 5 ( = 0.008, = 0.004, = 0.006, and = 0.004, respectively). Significant reductions in median contamination scores were observed in these groups. In Group 1, no statistically significant difference was found ( = 0.083). Numerically, the lowest median post-cleaning score (1.0) was seen in Groups 3, 4, and 5. The highest median percentage change was observed in Groups 4 and 5 (67%), followed by Group 3 (58%), and Group 2 (33%). No change was observed in Group 1.
Within the limitations of this study, it was shown that autoclave sterilization without mechanical cleaning is not sufficient for effective cleaning. Mechanical cleaning prior to sterilization is necessary for proper decontamination of endodontic files. Sponge and gauze-based methods were found to be the most effective, while brushing also provided a notable improvement in surface cleanliness.
本研究的目的是分析不同机械清洁方案后新牙髓锉表面的残留有机膜和碎屑。
使用了50支新的镍钛(NiTi)旋转器械。获取初始扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像,并对碎屑量在0至3之间进行评分。然后将锉分为五组,每组采用不同的清洁方案:1组:不进行机械清洁的高压蒸汽灭菌;2组:超声清洁;3组:刷洗和超声清洁;4组:用0.2%洗必泰浸渍海绵清洁并超声清洁;5组:用70%酒精浸渍纱布清洁并超声清洁。清洁后拍摄扫描电子显微镜图像,并对表面碎屑重新评分。使用视觉(直方图、Q-Q图)和统计(Shapiro-Wilk检验)方法评估数据正态性。由于分布非正态,采用非参数检验:组间比较使用Fisher-Freeman-Halton检验,组内比较使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验。
根据Fisher-Freeman-Halton检验,各组清洁后评分之间存在统计学显著差异(<0.001)。除第1组外,所有组清洁后评分均显著降低。Wilcoxon符号秩检验显示,第2、3、4和5组清洁前和清洁后评分之间存在统计学显著差异(分别为=0.008、=0.004、=0.006和=0.004)。这些组的中位污染评分显著降低。在第1组中,未发现统计学显著差异(=0.083)。从数值上看,第3、4和5组的清洁后中位评分最低(1.0)。第4和5组的中位百分比变化最高(67%),其次是第3组(58%)和第2组(33%)。第1组未观察到变化。
在本研究的局限性内,结果表明不进行机械清洁的高压蒸汽灭菌不足以有效清洁。牙髓锉进行适当去污前进行机械清洁是必要的。基于海绵和纱布的方法被发现是最有效的,而刷洗也使表面清洁度有显著改善。