Kondo Hiroaki, Hyuga Shunsuke, Shishii Miho, Fujita Tomoe, Okutomi Toshiyuki
Department of Anesthesiology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, JPN.
Division of Obstetric Anaesthesia, Center for Perinatal Care, Child Health and Development, Kitasato University Hospital, Sagamihara, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 24;17(7):e88671. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88671. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Background Heart rate variability-derived indices, such as the high-frequency vitality index (HFVI)/analgesia nociception index (ANI), have been proposed as objective pain assessment tools. However, their ability to predict pain perception during local anesthetic injection (LAI) remains unclear. Methods This single-center observational study included 44 pregnant women scheduled for cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The HFVI/ANI was measured for five minutes before LAI using a Root® monitor (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA). The primary outcome measure was the mean HFVI/ANI before LAI during spinal anesthesia. The secondary outcomes included the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the cut-off and predictive accuracy. Results There was no significant difference in the pre-LAI HFVI/ANI between the patients with visual numeric rating scale (VNRS) of ≤3 and those with VNRS of >3 (HFVI: 64.25 ± 11.8 vs. 62.64 ± 12.3, P = 0.66). ROC analysis revealed poor predictive ability (AUC = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.72). No significant correlation was found between HFVI/ANI and VNRS. Conclusion Pre-LAI HFVI/ANI values were not associated with pain perception during LAI during cesarean delivery. Further studies are needed to explore optimal indicators for HFVI/ANI-based pain assessment.
背景 心率变异性衍生指标,如高频活力指数(HFVI)/镇痛伤害感受指数(ANI),已被提议作为客观的疼痛评估工具。然而,它们在预测局部麻醉注射(LAI)期间疼痛感知的能力仍不明确。方法 这项单中心观察性研究纳入了44名计划在脊髓麻醉下进行剖宫产的孕妇。在LAI前使用Root®监护仪(Masimo公司,加利福尼亚州欧文市)测量HFVI/ANI五分钟。主要结局指标是脊髓麻醉期间LAI前的平均HFVI/ANI。次要结局包括受试者操作特征曲线下面积,以确定临界值和预测准确性。结果 视觉数字评分量表(VNRS)≤3的患者与VNRS>3的患者在LAI前的HFVI/ANI无显著差异(HFVI:64.25±11.8 vs. 62.64±12.3,P = 0.66)。ROC分析显示预测能力较差(AUC = 0.54,95%CI:0.36 - 0.72)。未发现HFVI/ANI与VNRS之间存在显著相关性。结论 剖宫产期间LAI前的HFVI/ANI值与LAI期间的疼痛感知无关。需要进一步研究以探索基于HFVI/ANI的疼痛评估的最佳指标。