Al-Hamad Areej, Yasin Yasin M, Yasin Lujain, Zhang Andy
Daphne Cockwell School of Nursing, Faculty of Community Services, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 1Z5, Canada.
Faculty of Nursing, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada.
Nurs Rep. 2025 Aug 11;15(8):293. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15080293.
: Private hosting arrangements have emerged as community-driven alternatives to institutional refugee housing, offering personalized support and opportunities for enhanced social integration. However, clarity around care practices and service delivery models remains underdeveloped. : This paper presents the findings of a scoping review aimed at mapping evidence on service delivery and care practices in private hosting contexts for refugee families. Following an overview of the background and methodology, we present key themes, propose a conceptual model, and conclude with implications for policy, practice, and future research. This scoping review maps existing literature on care practices; it does not assess the effectiveness of interventions or establish best practices. The review synthesizes empirical and gray literature on service delivery and care practices supporting refugee and displaced families in private hosting contexts. Following the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology, six academic databases and multiple gray literature sources were systematically searched, resulting in the inclusion of 28 studies. : The analysis identified four conceptual dimensions of care described in the literature: relational care and trust-building, program structure and policy integration, holistic integration pathways, and embedded equity and protection. While private hosting facilitates emotional connection and psychosocial integration, the review highlights key challenges, including variability in host preparedness, emotional labor disparities, and limited formal oversight. : The findings underscore the need for evidence-informed guidelines, standardized host training, trauma-informed approaches, and coordinated policy frameworks. The resulting model offers a foundation to inform future research, guide policy development, and strengthen private hosting practices to ensure equitable, inclusive, and sustainable outcomes for refugee and displaced families.
私人安置安排已成为社区驱动的替代机构难民住房的方式，提供个性化支持并为加强社会融合创造机会。然而，护理实践和服务提供模式方面的清晰度仍有待提高。
本文介绍了一项范围审查的结果，旨在梳理关于难民家庭私人安置环境中服务提供和护理实践的证据。在概述背景和方法之后，我们呈现关键主题，提出一个概念模型，并以对政策、实践和未来研究的启示作为结论。这项范围审查梳理了关于护理实践的现有文献；它不评估干预措施的有效性或确立最佳实践。该审查综合了关于在私人安置环境中支持难民和流离失所家庭的服务提供和护理实践的实证文献和灰色文献。按照乔安娜·布里格斯研究所（JBI）的方法，系统搜索了六个学术数据库和多个灰色文献来源，最终纳入了28项研究。
关系护理与信任建立、项目结构与政策整合、整体融合途径以及内在公平与保护。虽然私人安置促进了情感联系和心理社会融合，但审查突出了关键挑战，包括房东准备情况的差异、情感劳动差距以及有限的正式监督。
研究结果强调了基于证据的指南、标准化的房东培训、创伤知情方法以及协调的政策框架的必要性。由此产生的模型为未来研究提供了基础，指导政策制定，并加强私人安置实践，以确保为难民和流离失所家庭实现公平、包容和可持续的成果。
