Egele Viktoria Sophie, Stark Robin
Department of Education, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Sports (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;13(8):249. doi: 10.3390/sports13080249.
This study explored gender-specific nuances in the applicability of Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) to predict physical activity behavior. This study aimed to determine whether similar or different prediction patterns emerge for men and women, particularly emphasizing the tenability of the SCT model's theoretical assumptions across gender. Six hundred fifty-four participants (58.1% women, 41.1% men) completed two validated questionnaires at separate time points (t1 = social cognitive and demographic variables; t2 = physical activity behavior). We employed a multigroup Structural Equation Model (SEM) to examine the validity of the theoretical assumptions and the influence of gender. The results suggest that SCT's theoretical assumptions hold true for men and women, indicated by a highly satisfactory fit of the SEM despite the variance explained being small (R = 11.9%, R = 7.3%). However, the importance of the specific theoretical paths and the underlying mechanisms of action might differ between genders, and the interplay of the social and cognitive variables to predict physical activity may vary significantly for men and women. The use of SCT can be recommended for explaining and predicting physical activity behavior, although gender-specific differences in the underlying theoretical relationships should be taken into consideration when designing interventions or when being used to explain physical activity behavior.
本研究探讨了社会认知理论(SCT)在预测身体活动行为适用性方面的性别差异细微之处。本研究旨在确定男性和女性是否出现相似或不同的预测模式,特别强调SCT模型理论假设在不同性别中的合理性。654名参与者(58.1%为女性,41.1%为男性)在不同时间点完成了两份经过验证的问卷(t1 = 社会认知和人口统计学变量;t2 = 身体活动行为)。我们采用多组结构方程模型(SEM)来检验理论假设的有效性以及性别的影响。结果表明,SCT的理论假设对男性和女性均成立,尽管解释的方差较小(R = 11.9%,R = 7.3%),但SEM的拟合度非常令人满意。然而,特定理论路径的重要性和潜在作用机制在不同性别之间可能存在差异,并且社会和认知变量在预测身体活动方面的相互作用在男性和女性中可能有显著不同。尽管在设计干预措施或用于解释身体活动行为时应考虑潜在理论关系中的性别差异,但推荐使用SCT来解释和预测身体活动行为。