Hoyo-Guillot Augusto, Fernández Francisco Tomás González, Ruíz-Montero Pedro Jesús
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Campus of Melilla, 52005 Melilla, Spain.
TEPAS Research Group (HUM 1080), Department of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, 18011 Granada, Spain.
Sports (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;13(8):274. doi: 10.3390/sports13080274.
This study aims to demonstrate the value of physical education (PE) in fostering prosociality and academic motivation through active approaches derived from the sports education model (SEM), in contrast with the traditional methodology (TM). One of the new features introduced is based on an approach focused on physical fitness and health that goes beyond sports practice.
A 10-week intervention was conducted with a sample of 127 students ( = 127). In total, 63 students ( = 63) received an SEM-based intervention and 64 ( = 64) received traditional teaching. The effect of these methodologies on motivation, prosocial climate, and the perceived importance of PE has been verified, based on a fitness-oriented proposal.
The findings indicate improvements in the SEM group's prosociality (giving, = 0.015; verbal comfort, = 0.019; solidarity, = 0.039). Additionally, the TM group showed increased importance attributable to PE, though a deterioration in prosocial values was also observed. No evidence was found regarding changes in motivation.
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The implementation of SEM has positive effects on students' prosociality, whereas the opposite effect can be observed when employing TM. The non-inclusion of sports activities can affect the motivation variable.
本研究旨在证明体育教育(PE)通过源自体育教育模式(SEM)的积极方法培养亲社会行为和学术动机的价值,与传统方法(TM)形成对比。引入的新特征之一基于一种超越体育实践、关注体能和健康的方法。
对127名学生(n = 127)进行了为期10周的干预。总共63名学生(n = 63)接受了基于SEM的干预,64名(n = 64)接受了传统教学。基于一项以健身为导向的提议,验证了这些方法对动机、亲社会氛围以及对体育教育感知重要性的影响。
研究结果表明,SEM组的亲社会行为有所改善(给予,p = 0.015;言语安慰,p = 0.019;团结,p = 0.039)。此外,TM组显示出体育教育的重要性增加,不过也观察到亲社会价值观的恶化。未发现动机变化的证据。
讨论/结论:实施SEM对学生的亲社会行为有积极影响,而采用TM时则会观察到相反的效果。不纳入体育活动会影响动机变量。