Ezeddine Ghaith, Souissi Nafaa, Masmoudi Liwa, Trabelsi Khaled, Puce Luca, Clark Cain C T, Bragazzi Nicola Luigi, Mrayah Maher
High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Research Unit of the National Sports Observatory (ONS), Tunis, Tunisia.
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 25;13:1041252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041252. eCollection 2022.
In pursuit of quality teaching and learning, teachers seek the best method to provide their students with a positive educational atmosphere and the most appropriate learning conditions.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of the problem-solving method vs. the traditional method on motivation and learning during physical education courses.
Fifty-three students ( 15 ± 0.1 years), in their 1st year of the Tunisian secondary education system, voluntarily participated in this study, and randomly assigned to a control or experimental group. Participants in the control group were taught using the traditional methods, whereas participants in the experimental group were taught using the problem-solving method. Both groups took part in a 10-hour experiment over 5 weeks. To measure students' situational motivation, a questionnaire was used to evaluate intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, external regulation, and amotivation during the first (T0) and the last sessions (T2). Additionally, the degree of students' learning was determined video analyses, recorded at T0, the fifth (T1), and T2.
Motivational dimensions, including identified regulation and intrinsic motivation, were significantly greater (all < 0.001) in the experimental vs. the control group. The students' motor engagement in learning situations, during which the learner, despite a degree of difficulty performs the motor activity with sufficient success, increased only in the experimental group ( < 0.001). The waiting time in the experimental group decreased significantly at T1 and T2 vs. T0 (all < 0.001), with lower values recorded in the experimental vs. the control group at the three-time points (all < 0.001).
The problem-solving method is an efficient strategy for motor skills and performance enhancement, as well as motivation development during physical education courses.
为了追求高质量的教学,教师们寻求最佳方法,为学生营造积极的教育氛围并提供最合适的学习条件。
本研究旨在比较解决问题法与传统教学法在体育课程中对动机和学习的影响。
53名学生(年龄15±0.1岁),处于突尼斯中等教育体系的第一年,自愿参与本研究,并被随机分配到对照组或实验组。对照组学生采用传统方法教学,而实验组学生采用解决问题法教学。两组学生在5周内参加了为期10小时的实验。为了测量学生的情境动机,在第一次(T0)和最后一次课程(T2)期间,使用问卷评估内在动机、认同调节、外部调节和无动机。此外,通过对T0、第五次课程(T1)和T2记录的视频分析来确定学生的学习程度。
与对照组相比,实验组中包括认同调节和内在动机在内的动机维度显著更高(均P<0.001)。在学习情境中,学习者尽管有一定难度但仍能成功完成运动活动的学生的运动参与度仅在实验组有所增加(P<0.001)。与T0相比,实验组在T1和T2时的等待时间显著减少(均P<0.001),在这三个时间点,实验组的等待时间值均低于对照组(均P<0.001)。
解决问题法是体育课程中提高运动技能和表现以及发展动机的有效策略。