• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伴有肝转移的结直肠癌的动态预后模型

Dynamic Prognostic Models for Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases.

作者信息

Chen Qichen, Deng Yiqiao, Wang Kun, Li Yuan, Bi Xinyu, Li Kan, Zhao Hong

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529093. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29093.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29093
PMID:40864468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12391993/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Current prognostic models for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) primarily incorporate clinicopathologic features assessed at a single time point, resulting in a static risk assessment for individuals. Given that tumor progression is a dynamic process, especially for patients with CRLM, and patients' data are continuously collected during the follow-up visits, dynamic prediction is a natural model for risk assessments via reflecting the latest prognosis, whenever new marker measurements are available.

OBJECTIVE

To develop CRLM prognostic models and a clinical web-based tool to facilitate dynamic predictions.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective prognostic study, patients with CRLM who underwent resection between January 2014 and January 2021, were included in the training and validation cohorts. Clinicopathologic characteristics and preoperative and postoperative laboratory measurements taken within 12 months after surgery across 9 laboratory markers (carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, γ-glutamyl transferase, red blood cell distribution width SD and coefficient of variance, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, Fibrous-4 index, S-index, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) were collected. Three prediction models for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) based on a functional random survival forest framework were constructed and compared: model A incorporated only clinicopathologic characteristics, model B included clinicopathologic characteristics and preoperative laboratory markers, and model C integrated clinicopathologic characteristics along with longitudinal laboratory markers. Data were analyzed from June 2024 to June 2025.

EXPOSURE

Resection in patients with CRLM.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Performance metrics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Brier score (BS).

RESULTS

A total of 976 patients (median [IQR] age, 59 [51-65] years; 612 [62.7%] male) were eligible for this study, with 758 patients in the training cohort (median [IQR] age, 59 [52-66] years; 487 [64.2%] male) and 218 patients in the validation cohort (median [IQR] age, 58 [49-64] years; 125 [57.3%] male).The training cohort included a total of 24 992 longitudinal measurements, and the external validation cohort included 7198 longitudinal measurements. In the external validation cohort, model C demonstrated an improved prognostic capability compared with models A and B, with AUC values of 0.796 (95% CI, 0.740-0.848) for 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), 0.837 (95% CI, 0.768-0.899) for 3-year PFS, and 0.850 (95% CI, 0.780-0.914) for 5-year PFS. The corresponding BSs were 0.246 (95% CI, 0.236-0.261) for 1 year, 0.205 (95% CI, 0.193-0.218) for 3 years, and 0.142 (95% CI, 0.132-0.153) for 5 years. Model C consistently outperformed models A and B for overall survival (OS) prognosis, with AUCs of 0.849 (95% CI, 0.768-0.914) for 1 year, 0.741 (95% CI, 0.667-0.815) for 3 years, and 0.753 (95% CI: 0.656-0.849) for 5 years, alongside BS values of 0.047 (95% CI, 0.045-0.048) for 1 year, 0.178 (95% CI, 0.168-0.195) for 3 years, and 0.144 (95% CI, 0.133-0.165) for 5 years. Additionally, dynamic individualized risk profiles for PFS and OS were developed for patients. A web-based tool was created to facilitate the practical application of these dynamic prediction models for new patients in clinical environments.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this retrospective prognostic study, the dynamic models, along with the web-based tool for personalized prediction, demonstrated improved performance by incorporating multiple longitudinal makers.

摘要

重要性

目前用于结直肠癌肝转移(CRLM)的预后模型主要纳入在单一时间点评估的临床病理特征,从而对个体进行静态风险评估。鉴于肿瘤进展是一个动态过程,尤其是对于CRLM患者,并且在随访期间会持续收集患者的数据,动态预测通过反映最新预后(每当有新的标志物测量值时),是一种自然的风险评估模型。

目的

开发CRLM预后模型和基于网络的临床工具以促进动态预测。

设计、设置和参与者:在这项回顾性预后研究中,2014年1月至2021年1月期间接受手术切除的CRLM患者被纳入训练和验证队列。收集了临床病理特征以及术后12个月内的术前和术后实验室测量值,涉及9种实验室标志物(癌胚抗原、糖类抗原19-9、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、红细胞分布宽度标准差和变异系数、天冬氨酸转氨酶与血小板比值指数、Fibrous-4指数、S指数和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值)。构建并比较了基于功能随机生存森林框架的3种无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)预测模型:模型A仅纳入临床病理特征,模型B包括临床病理特征和术前实验室标志物,模型C整合临床病理特征以及纵向实验室标志物。数据于2024年6月至2025年6月进行分析。

暴露

CRLM患者的手术切除。

主要结局和测量指标

性能指标包括受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)和Brier评分(BS)。

结果

共有976例患者(中位[四分位间距]年龄,59[51-65]岁;612例[62.7%]为男性)符合本研究条件,训练队列中有758例患者(中位[四分位间距]年龄,59[52-66]岁;487例[64.2%]为男性),验证队列中有218例患者(中位[四分位间距]年龄,58[49-64]岁;125例[57.3%]为男性)。训练队列共包括24992次纵向测量,外部验证队列包括7198次纵向测量。在外部验证队列中,与模型A和B相比,模型C显示出更好的预后能力,1年无进展生存期(PFS)的AUC值为0.796(95%CI,0.740-0.848),3年PFS为0.837(95%CI,0.768-0.899),5年PFS为0.850(95%CI,0.780-0.914)。相应的1年BS为0.246(95%CI,0.236-0.261),3年为0.205(95%CI,0.193-0.218),5年为0.142(95%CI,0.132-0.153)。在总生存期(OS)预后方面,模型C始终优于模型A和B,1年AUC为0.849(95%CI,0.768-0.914),3年为0.741(95%CI,0.667-0.815),5年为0.753(95%CI:0.656-0.849),同时1年BS值为0.047(95%CI,0.045-0.048),3年为0.178(95%CI,0.168-0.195),5年为0.144(95%CI,0.133-0.165)。此外,还为患者制定了PFS和OS的动态个体化风险概况。创建了一个基于网络的工具,以促进这些动态预测模型在临床环境中对新患者的实际应用。

结论和相关性

在这项回顾性预后研究中,动态模型以及用于个性化预测的基于网络的工具通过纳入多个纵向标志物显示出更好的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa07/12391993/32667e77e72d/jamanetwopen-e2529093-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa07/12391993/2aa602a22227/jamanetwopen-e2529093-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa07/12391993/32667e77e72d/jamanetwopen-e2529093-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa07/12391993/2aa602a22227/jamanetwopen-e2529093-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa07/12391993/32667e77e72d/jamanetwopen-e2529093-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic Prognostic Models for Colorectal Cancer With Liver Metastases.伴有肝转移的结直肠癌的动态预后模型
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529093. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29093.
2
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
5
Development of Machine Learning-based Algorithms to Predict the 2- and 5-year Risk of TKA After Tibial Plateau Fracture Treatment.基于机器学习的算法用于预测胫骨平台骨折治疗后2年和5年全膝关节置换风险的研究进展
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003442.
6
Integrated Clinical-Molecular Classification of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Biomarker Analysis of the Phase 3 New EPOC Randomized Clinical Trial.结直肠癌肝转移的综合临床-分子分类:III 期 New EPOC 随机临床试验的生物标志物分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Sep 1;9(9):1245-1254. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.2535.
7
Competing risk and random survival forest models for predicting survival in post-resection elderly stage I-III colorectal cancer patients.用于预测I-III期老年结直肠癌患者术后生存情况的竞争风险和随机生存森林模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05824-1.
8
Predicting recurrence and survival in patients with non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a prospective population-based study with multicenter validation.预测肾细胞癌患者肾切除术后的复发和生存:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究及多中心验证。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):820-831. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000935.
9
Clinical diagnostic and prognostic value of homocysteine combined with hemoglobin [f (Hcy-Hb)] in cardio-renal syndrome caused by primary acute myocardial infarction.同型半胱氨酸联合血红蛋白[f(Hcy-Hb)]在原发性急性心肌梗死所致心肾综合征中的临床诊断及预后价值
J Transl Med. 2025 Jul 23;23(1):813. doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-06512-4.
10
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-validation: what does it estimate and how well does it do it?交叉验证:它估计的是什么,效果如何?
J Am Stat Assoc. 2024;119(546):1434-1445. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2023.2197686. Epub 2023 May 15.
2
Prognostic prediction model of colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers.基于术前血清肿瘤标志物的结直肠癌预后预测模型
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 May 27;16(5):1344-1353. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i5.1344.
3
Personalized prediction of postoperative complication and survival among Colorectal Liver Metastases Patients Receiving Simultaneous Resection using machine learning approaches: A multi-center study.
基于机器学习方法的同时切除的结直肠癌肝转移患者术后并发症和生存的个体化预测:一项多中心研究。
Cancer Lett. 2024 Jul 1;593:216967. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216967. Epub 2024 May 18.
4
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Association of preoperative aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index with outcomes and tumour microenvironment among colorectal cancer with liver metastases.术前天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶与血小板比值指数与结直肠癌伴肝转移患者的预后和肿瘤微环境的关系。
Cancer Lett. 2024 Apr 28;588:216778. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216778. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
6
Development and validation of a novel risk score to predict overall survival following surgical clearance of bilobar colorectal liver metastases.开发和验证一种新的风险评分模型,以预测双侧结直肠癌肝转移手术后的总生存期。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad085.
7
A machine learning model for colorectal liver metastasis post-hepatectomy prognostications.一种用于结直肠癌肝转移肝切除术后预后预测的机器学习模型。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2023 Aug 1;12(4):495-506. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-21-453. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
8
Multisocietal European consensus on the terminology, diagnosis, and management of patients with synchronous colorectal cancer and liver metastases: an E-AHPBA consensus in partnership with ESSO, ESCP, ESGAR, and CIRSE.多学会欧洲共识:结直肠癌肝转移同步患者的术语、诊断和管理:E-AHPBA 与 ESSO、ESCP、ESGAR 和 CIRSE 合作的共识。
Br J Surg. 2023 Aug 11;110(9):1161-1170. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad124.
9
Prognostic Impact of Tumor Markers (CEA and CA19-9) on Patients with Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Stratified by Tumor Number and Size: Potentially Valuable Biologic Markers for Preoperative Treatment.肿瘤标志物(CEA 和 CA19-9)对可切除结直肠癌肝转移患者肿瘤数量和大小分层的预后影响:潜在有价值的术前治疗生物标志物。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;30(12):7338-7347. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13781-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
10
Correlation between recurrence-free survival and overall survival after upfront surgery for resected colorectal liver metastases.根治性手术切除治疗结直肠肝转移术后无复发生存与总生存的相关性。
Br J Surg. 2023 Jun 12;110(7):864-869. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad127.