• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术:对肿瘤学获益潜在机制的见解。

Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Insight into Potential Mechanisms of Oncologic Benefit.

作者信息

Seretis Fotios, Panagaki Antonia, Seretis Charalambos, Sotiropoulou Maria, Psarologos Michail, Mamakos Nikolaos, Polyzois Konstantinos, Drakopoulos Vasileios, Kapiris Stylianos

机构信息

Third Department of General Surgery, Evaggelismos General Hospital of Athens, 10676 Athens, Greece.

Department of Gastroenterology, Konstantopouleio-Patision General Hospital of Athens, Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;17(16):2719. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162719.

DOI:10.3390/cancers17162719
PMID:40867348
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12384433/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has recently been proposed as a radical operation for the treatment of colon cancer. Increasing evidence suggests a survival benefit from this operation, although the exact reasons for this remain largely unknown.

METHODS

We have undertaken a comprehensive review of the literature in PubMed and Embase databases, examining the potential mechanisms explaining this oncologic benefit.

RESULTS

Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation appears to improve the rates of radial margin negativity and is associated with increased lymph node yield and improved staging for colon cancer patients by removal of apical lymph nodes and removal of skip metastasis. The en bloc removal of the cancer-related mesentery along the interfascial plane between the mesocolon and retroperitoneal structures removes en bloc tumor deposits that appear to have a significant negative effect on cancer prognosis, irrespective of lymph node status. CME is associated with decreased rates of local recurrence and improved disease-free and overall survival. The existing literature suffers from a lack of data on molecular pathology and integration of prognostic pathologic factors such as tumor deposits in patients undergoing complete mesocolic excision.

CONCLUSIONS

CME confers significant benefits in terms of local control of the disease and improves cancer-specific survival. Further research on the matter is necessary to incorporate prognostic pathologic and molecular parameters.

摘要

背景/目的:完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)最近被提议作为治疗结肠癌的根治性手术。越来越多的证据表明该手术能带来生存获益,尽管其确切原因在很大程度上仍不清楚。

方法

我们对PubMed和Embase数据库中的文献进行了全面综述,研究解释这种肿瘤学获益的潜在机制。

结果

采用中央血管结扎的完整结肠系膜切除术似乎能提高环周切缘阴性率,并且通过切除顶端淋巴结和跳跃转移灶,可增加结肠癌患者的淋巴结获取数量并改善分期。沿着结肠系膜与腹膜后结构之间的筋膜平面整块切除与癌相关的系膜,可整块切除似乎对癌症预后有显著负面影响的肿瘤沉积物,而与淋巴结状态无关。CME与局部复发率降低以及无病生存期和总生存期改善相关。现有文献缺乏关于接受完整结肠系膜切除术患者的分子病理学数据以及诸如肿瘤沉积物等预后病理因素的整合数据。

结论

CME在疾病局部控制方面具有显著益处,并可改善癌症特异性生存。有必要对此进行进一步研究,以纳入预后病理和分子参数。

相似文献

1
Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Insight into Potential Mechanisms of Oncologic Benefit.结肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术:对肿瘤学获益潜在机制的见解。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 21;17(16):2719. doi: 10.3390/cancers17162719.
2
Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术的右半结肠切除术是安全的,可增加淋巴结检出量并提高生存率:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Oct;25(10):1099-1113. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02471-2. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
3
Complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: Is D3 lymphadenectomy necessary?完整结肠系膜切除术治疗右半结肠癌:是否有必要行 D3 淋巴结清扫?
Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jan;26(1):63-72. doi: 10.1111/codi.16815. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
A systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE assessment of the evidence on complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with SAGES and ESCP participation.一项在SAGES和ESCP参与下,对右侧结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术证据的系统评价、荟萃分析及GRADE评估。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3466-3473. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11749-7. Epub 2025 May 5.
5
Complete mesocolic excision an assessment of feasibility and outcome.完整结肠系膜切除术:可行性与结果评估
Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2).
6
Complete mesocolic excision in colorectal cancer: a systematic review.结直肠癌的完整结肠系膜切除术:一项系统评价
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jan;17(1):7-16. doi: 10.1111/codi.12793.
7
Laparoscopic Radical Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision Offers Similar Results Compared with Open Surgery.与开放手术相比,腹腔镜根治性结肠切除术联合完整结肠系膜切除术的效果相似。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 7;61(7):1231. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071231.
8
Safety, quality and effect of complete mesocolic excision vs non-complete mesocolic excision in patients with colon cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.完整结肠系膜切除术与非完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌患者的安全性、质量和效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;19(11):962-972. doi: 10.1111/codi.13900.
9
Complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy with central vascular ligation in right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes, tumor recurrence and overall survival.完整结肠系膜切除术和中央血管结扎在右半结肠癌中的 D3 淋巴结清扫术:术后结局、肿瘤复发和总生存的系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):4945-4955. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08529-4. Epub 2021 May 11.
10
Surgery along the embryological planes for colon cancer: a systematic review of complete mesocolic excision.沿胚胎学平面进行的结肠癌手术:完整结肠系膜切除术的系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Sep;31(9):1577-94. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2626-2. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic impact and independent significance of tumor deposits in early-stage colon cancer: a population-based cohort study.早期结肠癌中肿瘤沉积物的预后影响及独立意义:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jun 26;40(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04908-8.
2
Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus Standard Resection for Right-Sided Colon Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.右半结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术与标准切除术的长期肿瘤学结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 May 31;56(1):127. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01248-2.
3
Pathological Investigation of Grasping-related Mesenteric Injury During Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection.
腹腔镜结直肠癌切除术中抓持相关肠系膜损伤的病理学研究
Anticancer Res. 2025 Jun;45(6):2493-2499. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.17620.
4
A systematic review, meta-analysis and GRADE assessment of the evidence on complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer with SAGES and ESCP participation.一项在SAGES和ESCP参与下,对右侧结肠癌完整结肠系膜切除术证据的系统评价、荟萃分析及GRADE评估。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jun;39(6):3466-3473. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11749-7. Epub 2025 May 5.
5
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.结肠癌的新辅助化疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Cancer. 2025 Jun 3;222:115476. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115476. Epub 2025 Apr 25.
6
The Degree of Extramural Spread of T3 Colon Cancer as a Prognostic Factor: Another Appeal to the American Joint Committee on Cancer.T3期结肠癌壁外扩散程度作为预后因素:对美国癌症联合委员会的又一次呼吁。
Cancer Med. 2025 May;14(9):e70720. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70720.
7
Preoperative angio-CT colonography improves the quality of lymph node dissection during minimally invasive right hemicolectomy: a propensity score-matched study.术前血管造影CT结肠成像可提高微创右半结肠切除术期间淋巴结清扫的质量:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3247-3258. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11649-w. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
8
Complete mesocolic excision versus D2 lymphadenectomy in right hemicolectomy: a meta-analysis of propensity score matched studies and randomized controlled trials.右半结肠切除术中完整结肠系膜切除术与D2淋巴结清扫术的比较:倾向评分匹配研究和随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 11;87(2):855-866. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002829. eCollection 2025 Feb.
9
Why did we encounter a pCRM-positive specimen whose preoperative MRI indicates negative mesorectal fascia involvement in middle to low rectal cancer?为什么我们会遇到一个术前MRI显示中低位直肠癌无直肠系膜筋膜受累的CRM阳性标本?
Tech Coloproctol. 2025 Mar 17;29(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s10151-025-03117-3.
10
Patterns of lymph node metastasis and long-term outcomes of splenic flexure colon cancer: a descriptive study from a Japanese high-volume center.脾曲结肠癌的淋巴结转移模式及长期预后:来自日本一家高容量中心的描述性研究
Surg Today. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s00595-025-02999-y.