Göktentürk Talha, Omay Yiğit, Arıcı Ali Fuat, Yazıcı Emre, Özbaşı Sevgen
Department of Turkish Education, Faculty of Education, Yıldız Technical University, Davutpaşa Campus, 34220 Istanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Turkish Education, Faculty of Education, Başkent University, Bağlıca Campus, 06790 Ankara, Türkiye.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jul 23;15(8):1002. doi: 10.3390/bs15081002.
Assessing teacher candidates' self-efficacy in using reading strategies is essential for understanding their academic development. This study developed and validated the Teacher Candidates' Self-Efficacy Scale for Informational Reading Strategies (TCSES-IRS) using a mixed-methods sequential exploratory design. Initial qualitative data from interviews with 33 candidates and a literature review guided item generation. Lawshe's method confirmed content validity. The scale was administered to 1176 teacher candidates. Exploratory (n = 496) and confirmatory factor analyses (n = 388) supported a five-factor structure-cognitive, note-taking, exploration and preparation, physical and process-based, and reflective and analytical strategies-explaining 63.71% of total variance, with acceptable fit indices (/df = 2.64, CFI = 0.912, TLI = 0.900, RMSEA = 0.069). Internal consistency was high (α = 0.899 total; subscales α = 0.708-0.906). An additional sample of 294 participants was used for nomological network validation. Convergent validity was demonstrated by significant item-total correlations and strong factor loadings. Discriminant validity was evidenced by moderate inter-factor correlations. Criterion-related validity was confirmed via significant group differences and meaningful correlations with an external self-efficacy measure. The TCSES-IRS emerges as a psychometrically sound tool for assessing informational reading self-efficacy, supporting research and practice in educational psychology.
评估职前教师使用阅读策略的自我效能感对于理解他们的学业发展至关重要。本研究采用混合方法序列探索性设计,开发并验证了信息性阅读策略职前教师自我效能量表(TCSES-IRS)。来自对33名职前教师的访谈和文献综述的初始定性数据指导了项目生成。劳希方法证实了内容效度。该量表施测于1176名职前教师。探索性因素分析(n = 496)和验证性因素分析(n = 388)支持了一个五因素结构——认知、做笔记、探索与准备、基于身体和过程以及反思与分析策略——解释了总方差的63.71%,拟合指数可接受(/df = 2.64,CFI = 0.912,TLI = 0.900,RMSEA = 0.069)。内部一致性较高(总量表α = 0.899;分量表α = 0.708 - 0.906)。另外294名参与者的样本用于验证法则网络。显著的项目 - 总量表相关性和较强的因子载荷证明了收敛效度。中等的因子间相关性证明了区分效度。通过显著的组间差异以及与外部自我效能感测量的有意义相关性,证实了效标关联效度。TCSES-IRS是一种心理测量学上合理的工具,可用于评估信息性阅读自我效能感,为教育心理学的研究和实践提供支持。