• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

配偶价值差异与关系满意度之间的联系——使用响应面分析的实证检验

The Link Between Mate Value Discrepancy and Relationship Satisfaction-An Empirical Examination Using Response Surface Analysis.

作者信息

Mehmetoglu Mehmet, Määttänen Ilmari, Mittner Matthias

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Edvards Bull veg 1, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 3, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;15(8):1131. doi: 10.3390/bs15081131.

DOI:10.3390/bs15081131
PMID:40867488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12383001/
Abstract

Existing studies on mate value discrepancy and relationship satisfaction often suffer from two key limitations: they conceptualize mate value as a single, undifferentiated construct and rely on simple difference scores to model discrepancy effects. The present study addresses these issues by examining the relationship between mate value discrepancy and relationship satisfaction using a multidimensional operationalization of mate value and applying response surface analysis. Data were collected in 2016 in Norway via a web-based survey administered by a market research company, with a sample stratified across the country's 19 counties. The final estimation sample included 904 individuals currently in romantic relationships. The analysis involved a combination of confirmatory factor analysis and response surface analysis. The findings indicate that relationship satisfaction is highest when both partners exhibit high levels of Family orientation, resourcefulness, appearance, sociability, and physical condition. Among these, family orientation emerged as the most important dimension. Notably, relationship satisfaction declined when both partners scored equally low on these traits. Implications for future research and theoretical implications are discussed.

摘要

现有的关于配偶价值差异与关系满意度的研究往往存在两个关键局限性

它们将配偶价值概念化为一个单一的、未分化的结构,并依赖简单的差异分数来模拟差异效应。本研究通过使用配偶价值的多维操作化方法并应用响应面分析来检验配偶价值差异与关系满意度之间的关系,从而解决了这些问题。2016年在挪威通过一家市场研究公司进行的基于网络的调查收集数据,样本在该国19个县进行了分层。最终的估计样本包括904名目前处于恋爱关系中的个体。分析包括验证性因素分析和响应面分析的结合。研究结果表明,当双方都表现出高水平的家庭取向、足智多谋、外貌、社交能力和身体状况时,关系满意度最高。其中,家庭取向是最重要的维度。值得注意的是,当双方在这些特质上得分都同样低时,关系满意度会下降。讨论了对未来研究的启示和理论意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e8/12383001/17eeadff0179/behavsci-15-01131-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e8/12383001/aec5c6ec1b76/behavsci-15-01131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e8/12383001/0bd6acd7495b/behavsci-15-01131-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e8/12383001/17eeadff0179/behavsci-15-01131-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e8/12383001/aec5c6ec1b76/behavsci-15-01131-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e8/12383001/0bd6acd7495b/behavsci-15-01131-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90e8/12383001/17eeadff0179/behavsci-15-01131-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Link Between Mate Value Discrepancy and Relationship Satisfaction-An Empirical Examination Using Response Surface Analysis.配偶价值差异与关系满意度之间的联系——使用响应面分析的实证检验
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 20;15(8):1131. doi: 10.3390/bs15081131.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Surveillance for Violent Deaths - National Violent Death Reporting System, 50 States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, 2022.暴力死亡监测——2022年全国暴力死亡报告系统,50个州、哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2025 Jun 12;74(5):1-42. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7405a1.
7
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
8
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
9
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
10
Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study.数字病理学与光学显微镜检查在组织病理学切片诊断中的内部及相互间差异:双盲交叉对比研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(30):1-75. doi: 10.3310/SPLK4325.

本文引用的文献

1
The paradox of prosperity and poverty: confronting inequality in Norway.繁荣与贫困的悖论:直面挪威的不平等现象。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Feb 3;49:101225. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101225. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Testing Sexual Strategy Theory in Norway.在挪威检验性策略理论。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 24;14(6):438. doi: 10.3390/bs14060438.
3
Norwegian Men and Women Value Similar Mate Traits in Short-Term Relationships.挪威男女在短期关系中看重相似的伴侣特征。
Evol Psychol. 2020 Oct-Dec;18(4):1474704920979623. doi: 10.1177/1474704920979623.
4
Ideal Standards, Acceptance, and Relationship Satisfaction: Latitudes of Differential Effects.理想标准、接纳与关系满意度:差异效应的范围
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 28;8:1691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01691. eCollection 2017.
5
Female perception of a partner's mate value discrepancy and controlling behaviour in romantic relationships.女性对伴侣配偶价值差异的认知以及浪漫关系中的控制行为。
Acta Ethol. 2017;20(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10211-016-0240-5. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
6
Skip the dishes? Not so fast! Sex and housework revisited.不洗碗?没那么容易!关于性与家务的再探讨。
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Mar;30(2):203-13. doi: 10.1037/fam0000161. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
7
Self, friends, and lovers: structural relations among Beck Depression Inventory scores and perceived mate values.自我、朋友和恋人:贝克抑郁量表得分与感知到的伴侣价值之间的结构关系。
J Affect Disord. 2003 Jul;75(2):131-48. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(02)00048-4.