• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙问卷“非药物治疗方法在儿童疼痛管理中的人性化护理(HUPEDCARE-Q)”的验证与管理

Validation and Administration of the Spanish Questionnaire 'Humanisation of Pediatric Care in Pain Management with a Non-Pharmacological Approach (HUPEDCARE-Q)'.

作者信息

García-Valdivieso Inmaculada, Sánchez-Infante Jorge, Hermida-Mota Miriam, Hernández-Iglesias Sonsoles, Pando Cerra Pablo, Gómez-Cantarino Sagrario

机构信息

Faculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Francisco de Vitoria University, 28223 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;12(8):1036. doi: 10.3390/children12081036.

DOI:10.3390/children12081036
PMID:40868488
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12384392/
Abstract

: The pain associated with invasive procedures is one of the most common experiences in the pediatric population. Its management remains insufficient due to gaps in healthcare training and knowledge. The aim of this study was to analyze the attitudes, beliefs, care practices, and training of healthcare professionals in relation to pediatric pain, through the development and application of the questionnaire 'Humanisation of Pediatric Care in Pain Management with a Non-Pharmacological Approach (HUPEDCARE-Q)'. : A cross-sectional, observational, and descriptive study with a quantitative approach was conducted to validate a questionnaire. The process was carried out in three phases: (1) design and initial development of the instrument; (2) evaluation of content validity through expert judgment, using the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC); (3) administration of the questionnaire to a large sample of healthcare professionals to assess its internal consistency and psychometric structure. : The evaluation involved five experts, and the items were assessed using the Content Validity Coefficient (CVC), with the overall CVC of the questionnaire exceeding 0.80. The average item scores given by the experts ranged from 0.88 to 0.95, indicating a high level of agreement in their evaluations. The results showed statistically significant positive correlations among most items ( < 0.001), indicating adequate internal consistency. : The content validation and pilot study confirmed the theoretical relevance and appropriateness of the HUPEDCARE-Q questionnaire items in the Spanish context. The results support its usefulness as a valid and reliable tool to identify attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and training needs in the humanized management of pediatric pain.

摘要

侵入性操作带来的疼痛是儿科人群最常见的经历之一。由于医疗保健培训和知识方面的差距,对其管理仍然不足。本研究的目的是通过开发和应用“非药物方法在儿科疼痛管理中的人性化护理调查问卷(HUPEDCARE-Q)”,分析医疗保健专业人员对儿科疼痛的态度、信念、护理实践和培训情况。

开展了一项采用定量方法的横断面观察性描述性研究以验证一份调查问卷。该过程分三个阶段进行:(1)工具的设计和初步开发;(2)通过专家判断,使用内容效度系数(CVC)评估内容效度;(3)向大量医疗保健专业人员发放调查问卷,以评估其内部一致性和心理测量结构。

评估涉及五位专家,使用内容效度系数(CVC)对各项进行评估,调查问卷的总体CVC超过0.80。专家给出的平均项目得分在0.88至0.95之间,表明他们的评估具有高度一致性。结果显示大多数项目之间存在统计学上显著的正相关(<0.001),表明内部一致性良好。

内容效度验证和预试验证实了HUPEDCARE-Q调查问卷项目在西班牙背景下的理论相关性和适用性。结果支持其作为一种有效且可靠的工具,用于识别儿科疼痛人性化管理中的态度、信念、知识和培训需求。

相似文献

1
Validation and Administration of the Spanish Questionnaire 'Humanisation of Pediatric Care in Pain Management with a Non-Pharmacological Approach (HUPEDCARE-Q)'.西班牙问卷“非药物治疗方法在儿童疼痛管理中的人性化护理(HUPEDCARE-Q)”的验证与管理
Children (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;12(8):1036. doi: 10.3390/children12081036.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
4
Validation of a questionnaire to assess complexity of palliative care needs in primary care in Malaga, Spain: a study protocol.西班牙马拉加初级保健中评估姑息治疗需求复杂性问卷的验证:一项研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 17;15(7):e102040. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102040.
5
Translation and Psychometric Validation of Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire: The Urdu Version for Facilitating Multidisciplinary Research in Pakistan.《简短疾病认知问卷的翻译与心理测量学验证:用于促进巴基斯坦多学科研究的乌尔都语版本》
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 20;18:5075-5088. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S536636. eCollection 2025.
6
Development of an instrument for screening mental health based on Ayurvedic concept of Triguna.基于阿育吠陀三德概念的心理健康筛查工具的开发。
J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2025 Aug 6;16(5):101175. doi: 10.1016/j.jaim.2025.101175.
7
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
8
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
9
Italian validation of the credibility/expectancy questionnaire in spinal pain: a useful tool for clinicians and physiotherapist (CEQ-I).意大利对脊柱疼痛可信度/预期问卷的验证:临床医生和物理治疗师的有用工具(CEQ-I)
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2025 Jun 21;16:20406223251324812. doi: 10.1177/20406223251324812. eCollection 2025.
10
Cultural competence education for health professionals.针对卫生专业人员的文化能力教育。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;2014(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of cortisol as a neonatal pain biomarker in the application of non-pharmacological analgesia therapies: systematic review and meta-analysis.在非药物镇痛疗法应用中评估皮质醇作为新生儿疼痛生物标志物:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05577-w.
2
"Preparation Is Key": Parents' and Nurses' Perceptions of Combined Parent-Delivered Pain Management in Neonatal Care.“准备是关键”:父母与护士对新生儿护理中父母联合实施疼痛管理的看法
Children (Basel). 2024 Jun 27;11(7):781. doi: 10.3390/children11070781.
3
Assessment of pain management among nurses using the knowledge and attitude survey regarding pain tool.疼痛管理评估工具在护士中的应用:知识与态度调查。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2024 May 2;30(5):226-234. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2024.30.5.226.
4
A scoping review of the epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in hospitalized neonates: What has changed in the past three decades?一项关于住院新生儿疼痛性操作的流行病学和治疗的范围性综述:在过去三十年中发生了哪些变化?
Eur J Pain. 2024 Oct;28(9):1468-1485. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2294. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
5
Validity and Reliability of Pain and Behavioral Scales for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review.早产儿疼痛和行为量表的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
Pain Manag Nurs. 2023 Oct;24(5):e84-e96. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2023.06.010. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
6
Nurses' knowledge and attitude towards children pain management: a multi-site survey study.护士对儿童疼痛管理的知识与态度:一项多地点调查研究。
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 23;11:1182529. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1182529. eCollection 2023.
7
Non-Pharmacological Pain Management Practice and Associated Factors Among Nurses Working at Comprehensive Specialized Hospitals.综合专科医院护士的非药物疼痛管理实践及相关因素
SAGE Open Nurs. 2023 Feb 20;9:23779608231158979. doi: 10.1177/23779608231158979. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
8
Effect of Non-Pharmacological Methods in the Reduction of Neonatal Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.非药物方法减轻新生儿疼痛的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 12;20(4):3226. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043226.
9
Neonatal pain assessment: Do we have the right tools?新生儿疼痛评估:我们有合适的工具吗?
Front Pediatr. 2023 Feb 2;10:1022751. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1022751. eCollection 2022.
10
Nurses knowledge, attitudes and education needs towards acute pain management in hospital settings: A meta-analysis.护士在医院环境中对急性疼痛管理的知识、态度和教育需求:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):4325-4336. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16612. Epub 2023 Jan 12.