• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫患儿药物不良反应复发情况分析

Analysis of the Recurrence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Patients with Epilepsy.

作者信息

Hernández García Ernestina, Lambert Lamazares Brenda, Gómez-Lira Gisela, Mendoza-Torreblanca Julieta Griselda, Duke Lomeli Pamela, López Flores Yessica, Rangel Escobar Laura Elena, Mejía Aranguré Eréndira, Ruiz-Velasco Acosta Silvia, Naranjo Albarrán Lizbeth

机构信息

Laboratorio de Farmacología, Subdirección de Medicina Experimental, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría, Ciudad de México 04530, Mexico.

Programa de Maestría y Doctorado en Ciencias Matemáticas y de la Especialización en Estadística Aplicada, Instituto de Investigaciones en Matemáticas Aplicadas y en Sistemas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México 04510, Mexico.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jul 26;18(8):1116. doi: 10.3390/ph18081116.

DOI:10.3390/ph18081116
PMID:40872507
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12389073/
Abstract

Epilepsy is a chronic neurological disease with a relatively high incidence in the pediatric population. Anti-seizure medication (ASM) may cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs), which may occur repeatedly. This study aimed to analyze the recurrence of ADRs caused by ASMs over a period of 122 months in hospitalized Mexican pediatric epilepsy patients. The patients were under monotherapy or polytherapy treatment, with valproic acid (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), and levetiracetam (LEV), among others. A total of 313 patients met the inclusion criteria: 211 experienced ADRs, whereas 102 did not. Patient sex, age, seizure type, nutritional status and related drugs were considered explanatory variables. Four statistical models were used to analyze recurrent events that were defined as "one or more ADRs occurred on a single day", considering both the classification of ADR seriousness and the ASM causing the ADR. A total of 499 recurrence events were identified. The recurrence risk was significantly greater among younger patients for both nonsevere and severe ADRs and among those with focal seizures for nonsevere ADRs. Interestingly, malnutrition was negatively associated with the risk of nonsevere ADRs, and obesity was positively associated with the risk of severe ADRs. Finally, LEV was associated with a significantly greater risk of causing nonsevere ADRs than VPA. However, LEV significantly reduced the risk of severe ADRs compared with VPA, and PHT increased the risk in comparison with VPA. In conclusion, this study offers a robust clinical tool to predict risk factors for the presence and recurrence of ASM-ADRs in pediatric patients with epilepsy.

摘要

癫痫是一种慢性神经疾病,在儿科人群中发病率相对较高。抗癫痫药物(ASM)可能会引起药物不良反应(ADR),且这些反应可能会反复出现。本研究旨在分析墨西哥住院儿科癫痫患者在122个月期间由ASM引起的ADR的复发情况。患者接受单药治疗或联合治疗,使用的药物包括丙戊酸(VPA)、苯妥英(PHT)和左乙拉西坦(LEV)等。共有313名患者符合纳入标准:211名经历了ADR,而102名未经历。患者的性别、年龄、癫痫类型、营养状况和相关药物被视为解释变量。使用四种统计模型来分析复发事件,复发事件被定义为“同一天发生一次或多次ADR”,同时考虑ADR严重程度的分类以及引起ADR的ASM。共识别出499次复发事件。对于非严重和严重ADR,年轻患者的复发风险显著更高;对于非严重ADR,局灶性癫痫患者的复发风险也显著更高。有趣的是,营养不良与非严重ADR的风险呈负相关,而肥胖与严重ADR的风险呈正相关。最后,与VPA相比,LEV引起非严重ADR的风险显著更高。然而与VPA相比,LEV显著降低了严重ADR的风险,而PHT与VPA相比增加了风险。总之,本研究提供了一个强大的临床工具,用于预测癫痫儿科患者中ASM-ADR存在和复发的风险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9736/12389073/321625eca270/pharmaceuticals-18-01116-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9736/12389073/92031d92f4f2/pharmaceuticals-18-01116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9736/12389073/321625eca270/pharmaceuticals-18-01116-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9736/12389073/92031d92f4f2/pharmaceuticals-18-01116-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9736/12389073/321625eca270/pharmaceuticals-18-01116-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the Recurrence of Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Patients with Epilepsy.癫痫患儿药物不良反应复发情况分析
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jul 26;18(8):1116. doi: 10.3390/ph18081116.
2
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: an updated Cochrane Review.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫:Cochrane系统评价的更新版
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.
5
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.
6
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
7
Treatment for epilepsy in pregnancy: neurodevelopmental outcomes in the child.妊娠期癫痫的治疗:儿童的神经发育结局
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 30;2014(10):CD010236. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010236.pub2.
8
Clinical effectiveness, tolerability and cost-effectiveness of newer drugs for epilepsy in adults: a systematic review and economic evaluation.成人癫痫新药的临床疗效、耐受性及成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(15):1-157, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9150.
9
Lamotrigine versus carbamazepine monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.拉莫三嗪与卡马西平单药治疗癫痫的疗效比较:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 28;6(6):CD001031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001031.pub4.
10
Stimulant and non-stimulant drug therapy for people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and epilepsy.兴奋剂和非兴奋剂药物治疗注意缺陷多动障碍和癫痫患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 13;7(7):CD013136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013136.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
[A multicentre epilepsy registry in Mexico].[墨西哥的一个多中心癫痫登记处]
Rev Neurol. 2024 Jan 1;78(1):9-15. doi: 10.33588/rn.7801.2023296.
2
Analysis of Adverse Drug Reactions in Pediatric Patients with Epilepsy: An Intensive Pharmacovigilance Study.癫痫患儿药物不良反应分析:一项强化药物警戒研究
Children (Basel). 2023 Nov 1;10(11):1775. doi: 10.3390/children10111775.
3
Pharmacokinetics of obese adults: Not only an increase in weight.肥胖成年人的药代动力学:不仅仅是体重的增加。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2023 Oct;166:115281. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115281. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
4
Neuropharmacology of Antiseizure Drugs.抗癫痫药物的神经药理学。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2021 Sep;41(3):336-351. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12196. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
5
Pediatric adverse reactions to antiseizure medications - An analysis of data from the Italian spontaneous reporting system (2001-2019).儿童抗癫痫药不良反应 - 意大利自发报告系统(2001-2019 年)数据分析。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jun;119:107989. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107989. Epub 2021 May 1.
6
The SANAD II study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of valproate versus levetiracetam for newly diagnosed generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, phase 4, randomised controlled trial.SANAD II 研究:丙戊酸钠与左乙拉西坦治疗新诊断的全面性和不可分类癫痫的有效性和成本效益:一项开放标签、非劣效性、多中心、4 期、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Apr 10;397(10282):1375-1386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00246-4.
7
Antiepileptic Drug Selection According to Seizure Type in Adult Patients with Epilepsy.成人癫痫患者根据发作类型选择抗癫痫药物
J Clin Neurol. 2020 Oct;16(4):547-555. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.4.547.
8
Evaluation of Intravenous Phenytoin and Fosphenytoin Loading Doses: Influence of Obesity and Sex.静脉注射苯妥英钠和磷苯妥英钠负荷剂量的评估:肥胖和性别影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2019 May;53(5):458-463. doi: 10.1177/1060028018818785. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
9
Pharmacokinetic characteristics of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).抗癫痫药物(AEDs)的药代动力学特征。
Ment Health Clin. 2016 Mar 8;6(1):8-20. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2015.01.008. eCollection 2016 Jan.
10
IV fosphenytoin in obese patients: Dosing strategies, safety, and efficacy.肥胖患者静脉注射磷苯妥英:给药策略、安全性和疗效。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2017 Feb;7(1):45-52. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000322.