Hess Sonja Y, Angeles-Agdeppa Imelda, Kinabo Joyce, Mitchodigni Irene Medeme, Silva Renuka, Tharaney Manisha, Azupogo Fusta, Bliznashka Lilia, Hinnouho Guy-Marino, Koyratty Nadia, Smith Taryn J, Olney Deanna K
Institute for Global Nutrition and Department of Nutrition, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Global Institute of Professional Development and Excellence, Manila, The Philippines.
Food Nutr Bull. 2025 Sep;46(1_suppl):S35-S44. doi: 10.1177/03795721251357385. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
Adequate amounts of fruit and vegetables (F&V) are an important part of a healthy diet, yet intake is suboptimal in most population groups worldwide. To better understand the evidence of strategies aiming to improve F&V intake, we conducted a scoping review of interventions assessing the impact on F&V intake, including those aiming to improve F&V intake explicitly and those targeting diet, health, lifestyle, or food environment generally. Among all eligible interventions reviewed, most of which were implemented in high-income countries, about half reported a significant positive impact on fruit and/or vegetable intake. Interventions that used a multicomponent strategy (61%) and those that focused on F&V specifically (72%) were most likely to find a significant increase in fruit and/or vegetable intake. Detailed summaries are provided in 2 accompanying articles. In the present article, we put these findings into perspective. Specifically, we considered the evidence for 4 target countries of the Fruit and Vegetables for Sustainable Healthy Diets Initiative: Benin, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, and Tanzania. When considering available evidence at the national level, there is a paucity of information from intervention trials despite evidence of inadequate F&V intakes in each of these countries. When considering available evidence at the global level, and especially for low-and-middle income countries, there is a critical need to strengthen the evidence across various intervention strategies, particularly related to targeting, timing, intensity, duration, frequency, and other key characteristics, to better understand how to enhance their impact on F&V intake in various population groups and contexts.
摄入充足的水果和蔬菜是健康饮食的重要组成部分,但全球大多数人群的摄入量并不理想。为了更好地了解旨在提高水果和蔬菜摄入量的策略的证据,我们对评估对水果和蔬菜摄入量影响的干预措施进行了一项范围综述,包括那些明确旨在提高水果和蔬菜摄入量的措施以及那些总体上针对饮食、健康、生活方式或食物环境的措施。在所有纳入综述的合格干预措施中,大多数在高收入国家实施,约一半报告对水果和/或蔬菜摄入量有显著的积极影响。采用多成分策略的干预措施(61%)和专门关注水果和蔬菜的干预措施(72%)最有可能使水果和/或蔬菜摄入量显著增加。详细总结见两篇随附文章。在本文中,我们将这些发现置于恰当的视角。具体而言,我们考虑了“可持续健康饮食的水果和蔬菜倡议”的4个目标国家的证据:贝宁、菲律宾、斯里兰卡和坦桑尼亚。在考虑国家层面的现有证据时,尽管这些国家都有水果和蔬菜摄入量不足的证据,但干预试验的信息却很匮乏。在考虑全球层面的现有证据时,尤其是对于低收入和中等收入国家,迫切需要加强各种干预策略的证据,特别是与目标设定、时机、强度、持续时间、频率和其他关键特征相关的证据,以便更好地了解如何增强其对不同人群和背景下水果和蔬菜摄入量的影响。