Şener Rüzgar, Bayrakdar Akan, Atıcı Müjde, Akgün Soner, Öcal Zeynep Senem Söyleyici, Karayiğit Raci, Yılmaz Ali Kerim
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, 07425, Antalya, Türkiye.
Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, 46100, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Aug 28;17(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01310-3.
The optimal combination of factors such as rest duration, type of activity, and individual variability for maximizing post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) following plyometric conditioning activity (plyometric CA) remains a subject of debate. To investigate the effects of different rest periods (4, 8, and 12 min) on performance following plyometric CA, this randomized controlled study was conducted.
Twenty physically active men were included in this study (mean ± SD: age 20.74 ± 1.94 years, with a range of 18-24 years, body weight 70.61 ± 3.01 kg, and height 176 ± 1.8 cm). Participants familiarized themselves with the plyometric CA protocol through a preliminary session involving three sets of ten tuck jumps to ensure proper technique. A familiarization test was performed on the first day. They performed in a vertical jump test with different rest periods (4, 8, 12 min) between tests, set at 48-hour intervals and the randomized design was compared to the control group. The data obtained were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests in SPSS 25 and Microsoft Office Excel.
Although no statistically significant differences were observed between conditions (p > 0.05), a consistent increasing trend in performance indicators was noted following 4-, 8-, and 12-minute rest intervals. Compared to the control condition, jump height increased by 2.81%, 2.95%, and 3.01%; peak power output (PPO) increased by 1.84%, 1.94%, and 2.59%; and PPO relative to total body mass increased by 2.04%, 2.06%, and 2.15%, respectively.
In conclusion, the findings highlight the complexity of rest interval effects on PAPE and suggest the necessity of individualized rest strategies to optimize athletic performance.
在增强式体能训练活动（增强式CA）后，为使激活后表现增强（PAPE）最大化，诸如休息时长、活动类型和个体差异等因素的最佳组合仍是一个存在争议的话题。为了研究不同休息时长（4分钟、8分钟和12分钟）对增强式CA后表现的影响，开展了这项随机对照研究。
本研究纳入了20名身体活跃的男性（均值±标准差：年龄20.74±1.94岁，范围为18 - 24岁，体重70.61±3.01千克，身高176±1.8厘米）。参与者通过一个包括三组、每组十个收腹跳的初步训练环节熟悉增强式CA方案，以确保技术正确。在第一天进行了一次熟悉测试。他们在垂直跳测试中，测试之间设置不同的休息时长（4分钟、8分钟、12分钟），间隔48小时，随机设计并与对照组进行比较。使用SPSS 25和Microsoft Office Excel中的适当统计测试对获得的数据进行分析。
尽管各条件之间未观察到统计学上的显著差异（p＞0.05），但在4分钟、8分钟和12分钟的休息间隔后，表现指标呈现出一致的上升趋势。与对照条件相比，跳跃高度分别增加了2.81%、2.95%和3.01%；峰值功率输出（PPO）分别增加了1.84%、1.94%和2.59%；相对于总体重的PPO分别增加了2.04%、2.06%和2.15%。
总之，研究结果凸显了休息间隔对PAPE影响的复杂性，并表明需要个性化的休息策略来优化运动表现。
