Sarkola Taisto, Seale Anna N, Tulzer Andreas, Duignan Sophie M, Grzyb Agnieszka, Tuo Giulia, Vanhie Ellen, McMahon Colin J
Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Stenbäckinkatu 9, PO box 281, 00029, Helsinki, Finland.
Minerva Foundation Institute for Medical Research, Helsinki, Finland.
Pediatr Cardiol. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s00246-025-04006-0.
Limited data exist on the implementation of current fetal cardiology training and practice guidelines, how trainees are assessed, and how trained fetal cardiologists maintain their skills among countries affiliated with the Association of European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). A structured questionnaire was sent to fetal cardiologists or national delegates from 44 centers in 33 European countries. Responses were obtained from 37 centers in 29 European countries with 31 responses from fetal cardiologists. Fetal echocardiography was equally performed in maternal (18) and pediatric (16) hospitals with median 3 (range 0-6) fetal cardiologists per center and > 4 fetal cardiologists in 13 centers. Core and advanced fetal cardiology training was offered in 17 (46%) and 21 (57%) centers. Advanced training was provided in higher volume centers (19/21). Assessment methods included direct trainee observation, case-based discussions, and participation in multidisciplinary team meetings, with mostly verbal feedback provided. Criteria for independent fetal echocardiography and counseling were based on training duration (range 2-24 months), number of assessments (range 100-1500), and number of counseling abnormal cases (range 40-200) performed under expert supervision, as well as on expert evaluations of trainees based on direct observation and fetal cardiac diagnostic accuracy. Formal certification in fetal cardiology was reported in three centers. Research activity among trained experts was reported among 25 (68%) respondents overall with 19 respondents involved with collaborative research. Trainee research was encouraged but not mandatory in clinical training. Maintenance of expert skills included sufficient clinical activity volume, teaching, and different forms of national and international networking. Fetal cardiology service quality assessments included missed cases discussion in 20 (54%) centers. There is substantial variation in advanced fetal cardiology training practice in Europe suggesting a need for further clarification of training criteria and structure. Trainee assessment is mainly verbal and based on direct observation. There seems to be a need to strengthen the fetal cardiology module in core pediatric cardiology training and to improve quality assessment of the clinical service provided.
关于当前胎儿心脏病学培训与实践指南的实施情况、学员的评估方式以及在欧洲儿科和先天性心脏病协会(AEPC)所属国家中,接受培训的胎儿心脏病专家如何保持其技能等方面的数据有限。向33个欧洲国家44个中心的胎儿心脏病专家或国家代表发送了一份结构化问卷。收到了来自29个欧洲国家37个中心的回复,其中胎儿心脏病专家的回复有31份。胎儿超声心动图检查在产科医院(18家)和儿科医院(16家)中开展情况相当,每个中心胎儿心脏病专家的中位数为3名(范围0 - 6名),13个中心有超过4名胎儿心脏病专家。17个(46%)中心提供核心胎儿心脏病学培训,21个(57%)中心提供高级胎儿心脏病学培训。高级培训在病例量较大的中心开展(21个中心中的19个)。评估方法包括直接观察学员、基于病例的讨论以及参与多学科团队会议,反馈大多为口头形式。独立进行胎儿超声心动图检查和咨询的标准基于培训时长(范围2 - 24个月)、评估次数(范围100 - 1500次)、在专家监督下咨询异常病例的次数(范围40 - 200例),以及专家基于直接观察和胎儿心脏诊断准确性对学员的评估。有三个中心报告了胎儿心脏病学的正式认证情况。总体上,25名(68%)受访者报告了接受培训专家的研究活动,其中19名受访者参与了合作研究。在临床培训中鼓励学员开展研究,但并非强制要求。专家技能的维持包括足够的临床工作量、教学以及不同形式的国内和国际交流。胎儿心脏病学服务质量评估包括20个(54%)中心的漏诊病例讨论。欧洲高级胎儿心脏病学培训实践存在很大差异,这表明需要进一步明确培训标准和结构。学员评估主要是口头的且基于直接观察。似乎有必要加强核心儿科心脏病学培训中的胎儿心脏病学模块,并改善所提供临床服务的质量评估。