Guido Jenny M, Krause Morgan, Frankel Brendon, Hillmer Emily, Knight Ariel W, Grider Katheryn, Moreno Ashley N, LaGrone Lacey N, Bixby Pamela, Bonne Stephanie, Bulger Eileen M, Cain James G, Chastek Jennifer, Coleman Julia Roberts, Costantini Todd W, Cozzi Nicholas, Davis Kimberly A, Dicker Rochelle A, Dorlac Warren C, Van Eaton Erik, Eriksson Evert, Evans Susan, Foster Shannon Marie, Goodloe Jeffrey M, Haut Elliott R, Jarman Molly, Johnson Alyssa, Kotagal Meera, Krause Morgan, Kubasiak John C, Lang Kelly, Leigh Allison Barbara, Mangat Halinder S, Marvel Debra Marie, Michetti Christopher Paul, Moran Vicki, Moreno Ashley N, Oczkowski Simon Jw, Person Michael A, Price Michelle A, Punch L J, Racey Megan, Ray Bradford L, Redmond Diane, Reinhart Linda Kate, Rhodes Heather, Rhodes Bryn, Rubiano Andres M, Sanchez Sabrina, Sarani Babak, Shelton Erica, Spain David A, Staudenmayer Kristan, Stein Deborah M, Valenzuela Julie, Villarreal Cynthia Lizette, Wells Jeffrey L, Wong Gabriela Zavala, Young LeAnne Sitari
Sanford USD Medical Center, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine; Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Northeast Georgia Health System; Gainesville, GA, USA.
medRxiv. 2025 Aug 24:2025.08.20.25334072. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.20.25334072.
In trauma care, there is a need to increase communication to ensure evidence-informed, best practice care guidelines are easily accessible to all providers to yield continuity of care. Clinical guidance use is one way to address this need while employing a patient-centered team approach.
During year two of the conference series, participants gathered in person and virtually to further develop the Minimum Viable Product (MVP) created during year one. Professional facilitators used the purpose-to-practice (P2P) framework to help structure and guide further consensus building.
Seventy in-person and up to 65 virtual attendees participated. Sixty-five responses were collected on the MVP reflection and initial feedback survey. Themes were developed surrounding the pillars of "Purpose," "Principles," "Participants," and "Practices" while looking at the "Structure" for "Sustainability." The "Purpose" pillar addressed the importance of rigorous, standardized implementation guidance. "Principles" exemplified the necessity of a collaborative approach and included all relevant stakeholders. Similarly, the central theme emphasized by the "Participants" pillar was the inclusiveness of all members of the trauma team. "Practices" dove into the deliverables of the initiative, including up-to-date decision-making support and logistics regarding guidance storage, management, and maintenance. Regarding "Structure," the most highly ranked idea was developing a steering committee whose purpose would be primarily to prioritize strategic initiatives.
Clinical guidance needs to be current and readily available to all providers. Next steps of this initiative include developing a steering committee and subcommittees to sustain momentum.
在创伤护理中,需要加强沟通,以确保所有医护人员都能轻松获取基于证据的最佳实践护理指南,从而实现护理的连续性。临床指南的应用是满足这一需求的一种方式,同时采用以患者为中心的团队方法。
在系列会议的第二年,参与者以面对面和虚拟方式聚集,进一步开发第一年创建的最小可行产品(MVP)。专业主持人使用目的到实践(P2P)框架来帮助构建和指导进一步的共识建立。
70名现场参与者和多达65名虚拟参与者参加了会议。在MVP反思和初步反馈调查中收集了65份回复。围绕“目的”“原则”“参与者”和“实践”等支柱制定了主题,同时审视了“可持续性”的“结构”。“目的”支柱阐述了严格、标准化实施指南的重要性。“原则”体现了协作方法的必要性,并包括所有相关利益相关者。同样,“参与者”支柱强调的中心主题是创伤团队所有成员的包容性。“实践”深入探讨了该倡议的可交付成果,包括最新的决策支持以及有关指南存储、管理和维护的后勤保障。关于“结构”,排名最高的想法是成立一个指导委员会,其主要目的是对战略举措进行优先排序。
临床指南需要及时更新并供所有医护人员随时使用。该倡议接下来的步骤包括成立一个指导委员会和若干小组委员会,以保持发展势头。