• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向综合且质量有保障的医疗服务提供:菲律宾健康智能卡的实例论证

Towards Integrated and Quality-assured Health Service Delivery: Making a Case for Health Smart Card in the Philippines.

作者信息

Hartigan-Go Kenneth Y, Prieto Melissa Louise M, Castillo Angel Faye G, Eleazar Ella Mae C

机构信息

School of Government, Ateneo de Manila University.

出版信息

Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jul 31;59(10):7-20. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.10474. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.47895/amp.vi0.10474
PMID:40894349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12391894/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In the Philippines, patients are constrained from accessing their own records, restricting their ability to freely choose who to seek care from. To address this, the study makes a case for the development of the health smart card in the Philippines, an integrative tool unique to each citizen carrying their lifetime medical record.

METHODS

The prototype is developed using no-code programming technology and validated through a series of focus group discussions and stakeholder consultations with patients (n=4), healthcare administrators (n=4), and hospital personnel (n=13). It was then revised based on the collected insights and recommendations.

RESULTS

Findings report that the current facility-centric model utilizing paper records constrains patients' access to their records due to long wait times, slow turnaround periods, constant intra- and inter-hospital transfers, and even charging of fees to acquire a copy of their own data. The health smart card alternative was widely accepted by the participants, particularly for its contribution to increasing data accessibility, patient empowerment, and advancing patient data ownership. Nevertheless, several considerations for the upscale implementation of the health smart card emerged, including creating an interoperable environment through harmonizing standards and capacity-building programs, and ensuring data security through robust cybersecurity measures. Issues on scalability and funding of the project were also raised, centering on the critical role of the government in stepping up as regulator and potential funder. Concerns over potential abuse, dataveillance, and the digital divide are tackled, highlighting the need to account for socioeconomic factors to ensure that no one is left behind in the implementation.

CONCLUSION

The study makes a case for the development and adoption of a health smart card to address the inaccessibility of records to patients. The study concludes by recommending the conduct of a pilot implementation to comprehensively demonstrate and analyze the features of the proposed scheme.

摘要

背景与目的

在菲律宾,患者获取自身病历受到限制,这削弱了他们自由选择就医对象的能力。为解决这一问题,本研究主张在菲律宾开发健康智能卡,这是一种为每位公民配备终身病历的集成工具。

方法

使用无代码编程技术开发该原型,并通过与患者(n = 4)、医疗保健管理人员(n = 4)和医院工作人员(n = 13)进行的一系列焦点小组讨论和利益相关者协商进行验证。然后根据收集到的见解和建议进行修订。

结果

研究结果表明,当前以医疗机构为中心、使用纸质病历的模式,由于等待时间长、周转期慢、医院内部和医院之间频繁转诊,甚至获取自身数据副本还需收费等原因,限制了患者获取病历。健康智能卡方案得到了参与者的广泛认可,特别是因其有助于提高数据可及性、增强患者权能以及推进患者数据所有权。然而,出现了一些关于健康智能卡大规模实施的考虑因素,包括通过统一标准和能力建设计划创建可互操作的环境,以及通过强大的网络安全措施确保数据安全。还提出了项目的可扩展性和资金问题,重点是政府在加强作为监管者和潜在资助者方面的关键作用。解决了对潜在滥用、数据监控和数字鸿沟的担忧,强调需要考虑社会经济因素,以确保在实施过程中没有人被落下。

结论

本研究主张开发并采用健康智能卡,以解决患者无法获取病历的问题。研究最后建议进行试点实施,以全面展示和分析所提议方案的特点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/30ee9da372e8/AMP-59-10-10474-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/71657f6a4d3a/AMP-59-10-10474-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/7679eeb5f6fc/AMP-59-10-10474-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/991469ee96eb/AMP-59-10-10474-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/a28cdbec6ebb/AMP-59-10-10474-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/af29aa342958/AMP-59-10-10474-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/a9e168c0350d/AMP-59-10-10474-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/6a2906bc0d6e/AMP-59-10-10474-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/7dcf462f8a4a/AMP-59-10-10474-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/e05638ac768f/AMP-59-10-10474-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/30ee9da372e8/AMP-59-10-10474-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/71657f6a4d3a/AMP-59-10-10474-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/7679eeb5f6fc/AMP-59-10-10474-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/991469ee96eb/AMP-59-10-10474-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/a28cdbec6ebb/AMP-59-10-10474-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/af29aa342958/AMP-59-10-10474-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/a9e168c0350d/AMP-59-10-10474-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/6a2906bc0d6e/AMP-59-10-10474-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/7dcf462f8a4a/AMP-59-10-10474-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/e05638ac768f/AMP-59-10-10474-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e42c/12391894/30ee9da372e8/AMP-59-10-10474-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards Integrated and Quality-assured Health Service Delivery: Making a Case for Health Smart Card in the Philippines.迈向综合且质量有保障的医疗服务提供:菲律宾健康智能卡的实例论证
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jul 31;59(10):7-20. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.10474. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
4
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
5
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
9
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
10
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.

本文引用的文献

1
Turnaround Time of Consults in a Primary Care System in Rural Philippines: A Descriptive Retrospective Cohort Study.菲律宾农村初级保健系统中会诊的周转时间:一项描述性回顾性队列研究。
Acta Med Philipp. 2024 Oct 15;58(18):20-26. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.8320. eCollection 2024.
2
Designing health outcomes through patient data ownership.通过患者数据所有权来设计健康结果。
J Hosp Med. 2023 Aug;18(8):765-768. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13148. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
Adoption of electronic health record systems to enhance the quality of healthcare in low-income countries: a systematic review.
采用电子健康记录系统以提升低收入国家的医疗质量:系统综述。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Jun;30(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100704.
4
Ownership of individual-level health data, data sharing, and data governance.个体层面健康数据的所有权、数据共享和数据治理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Oct 29;23(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00848-y.
5
A Micro-analysis Approach in Understanding Electronic Medical Record Usage in Rural Communities: Comparison of Frequency of Use on Performance Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.一种理解农村社区电子病历使用情况的微观分析方法:COVID-19大流行之前和期间使用频率对绩效的比较。
Procedia Comput Sci. 2022;196:572-580. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.051. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
Defining Digital Public Health and the Role of Digitization, Digitalization, and Digital Transformation: Scoping Review.定义数字公共卫生以及数字化、数字化和数字化转型的作用:范围综述。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 26;7(11):e30399. doi: 10.2196/30399.
7
Patient data ownership: who owns your health?患者数据所有权:谁拥有你的健康信息?
J Law Biosci. 2021 Oct 1;8(2):lsab023. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsab023. eCollection 2021 Jul-Dec.
8
Ethical Issues in Patient Data Ownership.患者数据所有权中的伦理问题。
Interact J Med Res. 2021 May 21;10(2):e22269. doi: 10.2196/22269.
9
The Academic Viewpoint on Patient Data Ownership in the Context of Big Data: Scoping Review.大数据背景下患者数据所有权的学术观点:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 18;22(8):e22214. doi: 10.2196/22214.
10
Sharing Is Caring-Data Sharing Initiatives in Healthcare.共享即关爱——医疗保健领域的数据共享计划。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9):3046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093046.