• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者数据所有权中的伦理问题。

Ethical Issues in Patient Data Ownership.

作者信息

Chiruvella Varsha, Guddati Achuta Kumar

机构信息

Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.

出版信息

Interact J Med Res. 2021 May 21;10(2):e22269. doi: 10.2196/22269.

DOI:10.2196/22269
PMID:34018968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8178732/
Abstract

Patient data have conventionally been thought to be well protected by the privacy laws outlined in the United States. The increasing interest of for-profit companies in acquiring the databases of large health care systems poses new challenges to the protection of patients' privacy. It also raises ethical concerns of sharing patient data with entities that may exploit it for commercial interests and even target vulnerable populations. Recognizing that every breach in the confidentiality of large databases exposes millions of patients to the potential of being exploited is important in framing new rules for governing the sharing of patient data. Similarly, the ethical aspects of data voluntarily and altruistically provided by patients for research, which may be exploited for commercial interests due to patient data sharing between health care entities and third-party companies, need to be addressed. The rise of technologies such as artificial intelligence and the availability of personal data gleaned by data vendor companies place American patients at risk of being exploited both intentionally and inadvertently because of the sharing of their data by their health care provider institutions and third-party entities.

摘要

传统上认为,美国概述的隐私法能很好地保护患者数据。营利性公司对获取大型医疗系统数据库的兴趣日益浓厚,这给患者隐私保护带来了新挑战。这也引发了与那些可能出于商业利益利用患者数据甚至针对弱势群体的实体共享患者数据的伦理问题。认识到大型数据库保密性的每一次泄露都会使数百万患者面临被利用的风险,这对于制定管理患者数据共享的新规则很重要。同样,患者自愿且无私地提供用于研究的数据,由于医疗保健实体与第三方公司之间的患者数据共享可能被用于商业利益,其伦理方面的问题也需要得到解决。人工智能等技术的兴起以及数据供应商公司收集的个人数据的可得性,使美国患者因医疗保健机构和第三方实体共享其数据而面临有意和无意被利用的风险。

相似文献

1
Ethical Issues in Patient Data Ownership.患者数据所有权中的伦理问题。
Interact J Med Res. 2021 May 21;10(2):e22269. doi: 10.2196/22269.
2
The public's comfort with sharing health data with third-party commercial companies.公众对于与第三方商业公司共享健康数据的接受程度。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2020;7(1). doi: 10.1057/s41599-020-00641-5. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
3
What Do We Mean by Sharing of Patient Data? DaSH: A Data Sharing Hierarchy of Privacy and Ethical Challenges.我们所说的患者数据共享是什么意思?DaSH:数据共享的隐私和伦理挑战层次结构。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Oct;15(5):833-841. doi: 10.1055/a-2373-3291. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
4
Data for sale: trust, confidence and sharing health data with commercial companies.数据买卖:信任、信心与向商业公司共享健康数据
J Med Ethics. 2023 Jul;49(7):515-522. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107464. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Patient Data-Sharing for AI: Ethical Challenges, Catholic Solutions.用于人工智能的患者数据共享:伦理挑战与天主教解决方案
Linacre Q. 2020 Nov;87(4):471-481. doi: 10.1177/0024363920922690. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
Privacy, Trust, and Data Sharing in Web-Based and Mobile Research: Participant Perspectives in a Large Nationwide Sample of Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States.基于网络和移动设备的研究中的隐私、信任与数据共享:美国全国范围内大量男男性行为者样本中的参与者观点
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 4;20(7):e233. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9019.
7
Patient data confidentiality and patient rights.患者数据保密与患者权利。
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Jun;62(1):41-9. doi: 10.1016/s1386-5056(00)00135-0.
8
DNA Data Marketplace: An Analysis of the Ethical Concerns Regarding the Participation of the Individuals.DNA数据市场:关于个人参与的伦理问题分析
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 5;10:1107. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01107. eCollection 2019.
9
Protecting Your Patients' Interests in the Era of Big Data, Artificial Intelligence, and Predictive Analytics.大数据、人工智能和预测分析时代保护患者利益。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Mar;15(3 Pt B):580-586. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.035. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
10
A Policy and Practice Review of Consumer Protections and Their Application to Hospital-Sourced Data Aggregation and Analytics by Third-Party Companies.消费者保护政策与实践回顾及其在第三方公司医院源数据聚合与分析中的应用
Front Big Data. 2021 Feb 12;3:603044. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2020.603044. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards Integrated and Quality-assured Health Service Delivery: Making a Case for Health Smart Card in the Philippines.迈向综合且质量有保障的医疗服务提供:菲律宾健康智能卡的实例论证
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jul 31;59(10):7-20. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.10474. eCollection 2025.
2
Using Real-World Data on Depression from EHR-based Research Networks: A Scoping Review.利用基于电子健康记录的研究网络中的抑郁症真实世界数据:一项范围综述。
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 5:rs.3.rs-7272352. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7272352/v1.
3
Ten recommendations for reducing the carbon footprint of research computing in human neuroimaging.减少人类神经影像研究计算碳足迹的十条建议。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2024 Jan 29;1. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00043. eCollection 2023.
4
Application of AI in the identification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a comprehensive analysis based on pathological, radiological, and genetic variation features.人工智能在胃肠道间质瘤识别中的应用:基于病理、放射学和基因变异特征的综合分析
Front Genet. 2025 Jul 4;16:1555744. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1555744. eCollection 2025.
5
The ethics of data mining in healthcare: challenges, frameworks, and future directions.医疗保健领域数据挖掘的伦理问题:挑战、框架及未来方向。
BioData Min. 2025 Jul 11;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13040-025-00461-w.
6
Ethical Challenges in Research Involving Hospitalized Patients: A Phenomenological Study.涉及住院患者的研究中的伦理挑战:一项现象学研究。
Health Care Anal. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s10728-025-00534-1.
7
The current status and future directions of artificial intelligence in the prediction, diagnosis, and treatment of liver diseases.人工智能在肝脏疾病预测、诊断及治疗中的现状与未来方向
Digit Health. 2025 Apr 13;11:20552076251325418. doi: 10.1177/20552076251325418. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
8
A Critical Review of the Prospect of Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Infectious Disease Diagnosis and Prognosis.人工智能在传染病诊断与预后中的应用前景批判性综述
Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 6;2025:6816002. doi: 10.1155/ipid/6816002. eCollection 2025.
9
Enhancing patient care: pharmacotherapeutic monitoring in community pharmacies - a literature review.加强患者护理:社区药房的药物治疗监测——文献综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Feb 6;87(3):1446-1453. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003039. eCollection 2025 Mar.
10
Development and evaluation of a low-cost database solution for the Community Paramedicine at Clinic (CP@clinic) database.用于诊所社区护理(CP@clinic)数据库的低成本数据库解决方案的开发与评估。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Dec 27;3(12):e0000689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000689. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic-informed consent: A potential solution for ethical dilemmas in population sequencing initiatives.动态知情同意:群体测序计划中伦理困境的潜在解决方案。
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2020 Apr 2;18:913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2020.03.027. eCollection 2020.
2
Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework.动态同意:评估与报告框架。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Jul;15(3):175-186. doi: 10.1177/1556264619887073. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
3
The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare.人工智能在医疗保健领域的潜力。
Future Healthc J. 2019 Jun;6(2):94-98. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94.
4
Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models.利用生成模型估计不完全数据集重识别的成功率。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 23;10(1):3069. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10933-3.
5
Understanding the patient privacy perspective on health information exchange: A systematic review.理解患者对健康信息交换的隐私观点:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.014. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
6
Should Immigration Status Information Be Included in a Patient's Health Record?患者健康记录中是否应包含移民身份信息?
AMA J Ethics. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):E8-16. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.8.
7
Feasibility of Reidentifying Individuals in Large National Physical Activity Data Sets From Which Protected Health Information Has Been Removed With Use of Machine Learning.利用机器学习对已去除保护健康信息的大型国家体力活动数据集进行重新识别个体的可行性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Dec 7;1(8):e186040. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6040.
8
Eliciting meta consent for future secondary research use of health data using a smartphone application - a proof of concept study in the Danish population.使用智能手机应用程序获取对健康数据未来二次研究用途的元同意——丹麦人群中的一项概念验证研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Aug 15;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0209-6.
9
Consent and widespread access to personal health information for the delivery of care: a large scale telephone survey of consumers' attitudes using vignettes in New Zealand.为提供医疗服务而获取个人健康信息的同意与广泛获取:一项在新西兰使用 vignettes 对消费者态度进行的大规模电话调查。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 23;6(8):e011640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011640.
10
Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.电子健康记录:过去、现在与未来。
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 May 20;Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S48-61. doi: 10.15265/IYS-2016-s006.