Suppr超能文献

活性物质丙硫菌唑农药风险评估的同行评审。

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prothioconazole.

作者信息

Álvarez Fernando, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Batista Leite Sofia, Binaglia Marco, Castoldi Anna Federica, Chiusolo Arianna, Colagiorgi Angelo, Colas Mathilde, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, De Magistris Isabella, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Ferilli Franco, Fittipaldi Broussard Monica, Giner Santonja German, Gouliarmou Varvara, Halling Katrin, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Kienzler Aude, Lanzoni Anna, Lava Roberto, Leuschner Renata, Linguadoca Alberto, Louisse Jochem, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Mioč Andrea, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Padricello Vincenzo, Panzarea Martina, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Rizzuto Simone, Santos Miguel, Serafimova Rositsa, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Theobald Anne, Tiramani Manuela, Vianello Giorgia, Villamar-Bouza Laura

出版信息

EFSA J. 2025 Aug 28;23(8):e9593. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9593. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, the United Kingdom and Poland, after Brexit and co-rapporteur Member State, France, for the pesticide active substance prothioconazole are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of prothioconazole as a fungicide on barley, wheat, oats, spelt, rye and triticale field crops and seeds. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.

摘要

报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)在对报告成员国(英国)、共同报告成员国(法国)以及脱欧后的波兰主管当局针对农药活性物质丙硫菌唑开展的初始风险评估进行同行评审之后得出的结论。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(欧盟)第844/2012号(经委员会实施条例(欧盟)第2018/1659号修订)所要求的。这些结论是基于对丙硫菌唑作为杀菌剂在大麦、小麦、燕麦、斯佩尔特小麦、黑麦和小黑麦大田作物及种子上的代表性用途的评估得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的但被认定缺失的信息。报告了已发现的问题。

相似文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prothioconazole.
EFSA J. 2025 Aug 28;23(8):e9593. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9593. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance halosulfuron-methyl.
EFSA J. 2025 Jul 3;23(7):e9504. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9504. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fosetyl.
EFSA J. 2025 Aug 6;23(8):e9513. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9513. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance formetanate (variant assessed formetanate hydrochloride).
EFSA J. 2025 Jun 23;23(6):e9192. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9192. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pelargonic acid (nonanoic acid).
EFSA J. 2025 Jun 19;23(6):e9408. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9408. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metrafenone.
EFSA J. 2023 May 22;21(5):e08012. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8012. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metalaxyl-M (amendment of approval conditions).
EFSA J. 2025 Jul 29;23(7):e9573. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9573. eCollection 2025 Jul.
8
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pydiflumetofen.
EFSA J. 2025 Jun 25;23(6):e9471. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9471. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyraclostrobin.
EFSA J. 2025 Mar 6;23(3):e9257. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9257. eCollection 2025 Mar.
10
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance ethephon.
EFSA J. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):e07742. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7742. eCollection 2023 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fosetyl.
EFSA J. 2025 Aug 6;23(8):e9513. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9513. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals.
EFSA J. 2009 Dec 17;7(12):1438. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438. eCollection 2009 Dec.
3
Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance abamectin.
EFSA J. 2008 Jul 29;6(7):147r. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.147r. eCollection 2008 Jul.
4
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Review of the existing maximum residue levels for fluxapyroxad according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005.
EFSA J. 2020 Jan 16;18(1):e05984. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5984. eCollection 2020 Jan.
7
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the triazole derivative metabolites in light of confirmatory data submitted.
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 27;16(7):e05376. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5376. eCollection 2018 Jul.
8
Guidance for the identification of endocrine disruptors in the context of Regulations (EU) No 528/2012 and (EC) No 1107/2009.
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 7;16(6):e05311. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5311. eCollection 2018 Jun.
9
Guidance on dermal absorption.
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 30;15(6):e04873. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4873. eCollection 2017 Jun.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验