• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鸟类和哺乳动物的风险评估

Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals.

出版信息

EFSA J. 2009 Dec 17;7(12):1438. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438. eCollection 2009 Dec.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438
PMID:40123698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11926626/
Abstract

The revised Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals on the basis of the Scientific Opinion of the PPR Panel on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals (The EFSA Journal (2008) 734: 1-181) and its Appendices has been finalised based on the decisions of the Joint WG consisting of representatives from the European Commission, nominated Member States and technical experts from EFSA.

摘要

基于动植物卫生委员会（PPR）关于鸟类和哺乳动物风险评估指导文件背后科学依据的科学意见（《欧洲食品安全局杂志》（2008年）第734期：第1 - 181页）及其附录修订的《鸟类和哺乳动物风险评估指导文件》，已根据由欧盟委员会、指定成员国代表以及欧洲食品安全局技术专家组成的联合工作组的决定最终确定。

相似文献

1
Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals.鸟类和哺乳动物的风险评估
EFSA J. 2009 Dec 17;7(12):1438. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1438. eCollection 2009 Dec.
2
Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals - Revision of Guidance Document under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/4145/2000 - final of 25 September 2002) - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for birds and mammals.鸟类和哺乳动物的风险评估——根据理事会指令91/414/EEC修订指导文件（SANCO/4145/2000 - 2002年9月25日终稿）——植物保护产品及其残留问题专家组（PPR）关于鸟类和哺乳动物风险评估指导文件背后科学依据的科学意见
EFSA J. 2008 Jul 24;6(7):734. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.734. eCollection 2008 Jul.
3
Scientific opinion on pesticides in foods for infants and young children.关于婴幼儿食品中农药的科学意见。
EFSA J. 2018 Jun 28;16(6):e05286. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5286. eCollection 2018 Jun.
4
Statement on the toxicological properties and maximum residue levels of acetamiprid and its metabolites.关于啶虫脒及其代谢物毒理学特性和最大残留限量的声明。
EFSA J. 2024 May 15;22(5):e8759. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8759. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance terbuthylazine in light of confirmatory data submitted.根据提交的确证数据对活性物质特丁津的农药风险评估进行的更新同行评审。
EFSA J. 2019 Sep 19;17(9):e05817. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5817. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Reflections on bird and mammal risk assessment for plant protection products in the European Union: Past, present, and future.欧盟植物保护产品鸟类和哺乳动物风险评估的思考：过去、现在与未来
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017 Mar;36(3):565-575. doi: 10.1002/etc.3719.
7
Guidance on dermal absorption.皮肤吸收指南。
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 30;15(6):e04873. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4873. eCollection 2017 Jun.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment for the active substance isoxaflutole in light of negligible exposure data submitted.根据所提交的可忽略不计的暴露数据，对活性物质异恶唑草酮的农药风险评估进行同行评审。
EFSA J. 2017 Feb 24;15(2):e04731. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4731. eCollection 2017 Feb.
9
Guidance on the assessment of exposure of operators, workers, residents and bystanders in risk assessment of plant protection products.植保产品风险评估中操作人员、工人、居民和旁观者暴露评估指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07032. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7032. eCollection 2022 Jan.
10
Pesticide risk assessment for the active substance pymetrozine in light of negligible exposure data submitted.
EFSA J. 2017 Jan 11;15(1):e04678. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4678. eCollection 2017 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance prothioconazole.活性物质丙硫菌唑农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2025 Aug 28;23(8):e9593. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9593. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance fosetyl.活性物质福美双农药风险评估的更新同行评审
EFSA J. 2025 Aug 6;23(8):e9513. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9513. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance metalaxyl-M (amendment of approval conditions).活性物质精甲霜灵农药风险评估的更新同行评审（批准条件修订）
EFSA J. 2025 Jul 29;23(7):e9573. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9573. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance halosulfuron-methyl.活性物质甲基磺草酮农药风险评估的同行评审
EFSA J. 2025 Jul 3;23(7):e9504. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9504. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pydiflumetofen.活性物质氟唑菌酰羟胺农药风险评估的更新同行评审。
EFSA J. 2025 Jun 25;23(6):e9471. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9471. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance formetanate (variant assessed formetanate hydrochloride).活性物质灭多威（评估变体为盐酸灭多威）农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2025 Jun 23;23(6):e9192. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9192. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pelargonic acid (nonanoic acid).活性物质壬酸农药风险评估的更新同行评审。
EFSA J. 2025 Jun 19;23(6):e9408. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9408. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance buprofezin.活性成分噻嗪酮农药风险评估的同行评审。
EFSA J. 2025 Apr 24;23(4):e9392. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9392. eCollection 2025 Apr.
9
Availability of pesticide-treated seeds and bird occurrence in freshly drilled onion and carrot fields in Brazil.巴西新播种的洋葱和胡萝卜田中经过农药处理的种子的可获得情况及鸟类出现情况。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2025 May 1;21(3):665-673. doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjaf002.
10
Integrating population-level effects into the regulatory assessment of endocrine disrupting substances.将人群水平效应纳入内分泌干扰物质的监管评估中。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2025 May 1;21(3):639-648. doi: 10.1093/inteam/vjae039.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals - Revision of Guidance Document under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/4145/2000 - final of 25 September 2002) - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for birds and mammals.鸟类和哺乳动物的风险评估——根据理事会指令91/414/EEC修订指导文件（SANCO/4145/2000 - 2002年9月25日终稿）——植物保护产品及其残留问题专家组（PPR）关于鸟类和哺乳动物风险评估指导文件背后科学依据的科学意见
EFSA J. 2008 Jul 24;6(7):734. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.734. eCollection 2008 Jul.
2
Ten years of mixing cocktails: a review of combination effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals.十年鸡尾酒调配：内分泌干扰化学物质联合效应综述
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Dec;115 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):98-105. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9357.
3
Case Study Part 1: How to calculate appropriate deterministic long-term toxicity to exposure ratios (TERs) for birds and mammals.案例研究第一部分：如何计算鸟类和哺乳动物接触的适当确定性长期毒性暴露比（TERs）。
Ecotoxicology. 2005 Nov;14(8):877-93. doi: 10.1007/s10646-005-0034-4. Epub 2005 Nov 23.
4
Application and validation of approaches for the predictive hazard assessment of realistic pesticide mixtures.现实农药混合物预测性危害评估方法的应用与验证
Aquat Toxicol. 2006 Feb 10;76(2):93-110. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2005.10.001. Epub 2005 Nov 28.
5
A review of interspecies toxicity extrapolation in birds and mammals and a proposal for long-term toxicity data.鸟类和哺乳动物种间毒性外推综述及长期毒性数据提案。
Ecotoxicology. 2005 Nov;14(8):817-32. doi: 10.1007/s10646-005-0030-8. Epub 2005 Nov 16.
6
Analysis of a database of pesticide residues on plants for wildlife risk assessment.用于野生动物风险评估的植物农药残留数据库分析。
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2005 Feb;24(2):360-71. doi: 10.1897/03-656.1.
7
Pesticide acute toxicity reference values for birds.鸟类的农药急性毒性参考值。
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2001;170:13-74.
8
A system dynamic model for the assessment of different exposure routes in aquatic ecosystems.一种用于评估水生生态系统中不同暴露途径的系统动力学模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2000 Mar 20;247(2-3):107-18. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00482-9.
9
Allometric models for interspecies extrapolation of wildlife toxicity data.用于野生动物毒性数据种间外推的异速生长模型。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1999 Jun;62(6):653-63. doi: 10.1007/s001289900924.
10
On the use of scaling factors to improve interspecies extrapolation of acute toxicity in birds.关于使用比例因子来改进鸟类急性毒性的种间外推。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996 Aug;24(1 Pt 1):24-9. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0061.