• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国密苏里州圣路易斯市宜居性的空间与政策分析。

Spatial and policy analysis of livability in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

作者信息

Leão Ana Luiza Favarão, Silva Milena Franco, Gierbolini-Rivera Raúl D, Shaw Courtney, O'Connor Áine, Resendiz B Eugen, Lowe Melanie, Salvo Deborah, Siqueira Reis Rodrigo

机构信息

Brookings Dr, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States. Washington University in St. Louis; Prevention Research Center; People Health & Place Unit.

Celso Garcia Cid Highway, PR-445, Km 380, Londrina, PR. State University of Londrina, Technology and Urbanism Center.

出版信息

Cities Health. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2025.2526258.

DOI:10.1080/23748834.2025.2526258
PMID:40895599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12395329/
Abstract

A livable city ensures safety, health, inclusivity, sustainability, housing, mobility, and opportunities for all. The Global Observatory of Healthy and Sustainable Cities (GOHSC) launched the 1000 Cities Challenge to assess urban health and sustainability globally. This study uses the GOHSC's spatial and policy indicators to evaluate livability in St. Louis, Missouri. Using a mixed-methods approach, we analyzed the spatial distribution of built environment and transport features alongside planning and sustainability policies. Spatial indicators were derived from open data. Policy documents were coded for their governance level, alignment with evidence from healthy cities, and inclusion of measurable targets. Most residents (91.7%) lived in neighborhoods with optimal street intersection density (100 intersections/km). However, only 2.8% lived in areas with optimal population density (5,700 people/km). Just 26.3% lived near public transit, and 44.5% had access to large public open spaces below the GOHSC city averages (44.6% and 66%). While there was good coverage of policies, policy quality was low (31%), with most lacking measurable targets. The policy and spatial indicators enabled a comprehensive evaluation of livability. Future research should synthesize local and regional policies, supplement livability indicators with measures of environmental (in)justice within cities and utilize streetscape micro-scale data to deepen livability analysis.

摘要

宜居城市确保所有人的安全、健康、包容性、可持续性、住房、出行及机会。全球健康与可持续城市观测站(GOHSC)发起了“千城挑战”,以评估全球城市的健康与可持续性。本研究使用GOHSC的空间和政策指标来评估密苏里州圣路易斯市的宜居性。我们采用混合方法,分析了建成环境和交通特征的空间分布以及规划和可持续性政策。空间指标源自开放数据。政策文件根据其治理水平、与健康城市证据的一致性以及是否包含可衡量目标进行编码。大多数居民(91.7%)居住在街道交叉口密度最佳(100个交叉口/平方公里)的社区。然而,只有2.8%的居民居住在人口密度最佳(5700人/平方公里)的地区。只有26.3%的居民居住在公共交通附近,44.5%的居民可使用低于GOHSC城市平均水平(44.6%和66%)的大型公共开放空间。虽然政策覆盖范围良好,但政策质量较低(31%),大多数政策缺乏可衡量目标。政策和空间指标能够对宜居性进行全面评估。未来的研究应综合地方和区域政策,用城市内部环境(不)公平的衡量指标补充宜居性指标,并利用街道景观微观尺度数据深化宜居性分析。

相似文献

1
Spatial and policy analysis of livability in the city of St. Louis, Missouri, USA.美国密苏里州圣路易斯市宜居性的空间与政策分析。
Cities Health. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2025.2526258.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Effects of city design on transport mode choice and exposure to health risks during and after a crisis: a retrospective observational analysis.危机期间及之后城市设计对交通方式选择和健康风险暴露的影响:一项回顾性观察分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jun;9(6):e467-e479. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00088-9.
4
Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes.涉及物理环境和基础设施干预措施的贫民窟改造策略及其对健康和社会经济成果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31(1):CD010067. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010067.pub2.
5
Introducing the dataset for measuring centrality for sustainability-A case study of Pecinci municipality, Serbia.介绍用于衡量可持续性中心性的数据集——以塞尔维亚佩钦奇市为例
Data Brief. 2025 May 27;61:111714. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111714. eCollection 2025 Aug.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Urban Design and Transport Planning for Physical Activity, Health, and Well-Being: Do Cities in Oman Meet Evidence-Informed Policy Standards?
J Phys Act Health. 2025 Aug 5:1-10. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2025-0184.
8
Community wide interventions for increasing physical activity.全社区范围内增加身体活动的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 5;1(1):CD008366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008366.pub3.
9
Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study.公众对普遍基本收入和其他基于收入的政策的健康与非健康结果的偏好:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul 30:1-26. doi: 10.3310/ALDS8846.
10
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.

本文引用的文献

1
When Moving Is the Only Option: The Role of Necessity Versus Choice for Understanding and Promoting Physical Activity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.当迁移成为唯一选择时:必要性与选择在理解和促进低收入及中等收入国家身体活动方面的作用
Annu Rev Public Health. 2023 Apr 3;44:151-169. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071321-042211. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
2
Correlates and determinants of transport-related physical activity among adults: an interdisciplinary systematic review.成人交通相关体力活动的相关性因素和决定因素:跨学科系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 10;22(1):1519. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13937-9.
3
The Relationship of Historical Redlining with Present-Day Neighborhood Environmental and Health Outcomes: A Scoping Review and Conceptual Model.历史红线与当今邻里环境和健康结果的关系:范围综述和概念模型。
J Urban Health. 2022 Dec;99(6):959-983. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00665-z. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
4
Using open data and open-source software to develop spatial indicators of urban design and transport features for achieving healthy and sustainable cities.利用开放数据和开源软件开发城市设计和交通特征的空间指标,以实现健康和可持续的城市。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jun;10(6):e907-e918. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00072-9.
5
Determining thresholds for spatial urban design and transport features that support walking to create healthy and sustainable cities: findings from the IPEN Adult study.确定支持步行的空间城市设计和交通特征的阈值,以创建健康和可持续的城市:来自 IPEN 成人研究的结果。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jun;10(6):e895-e906. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00068-7.
6
City planning policies to support health and sustainability: an international comparison of policy indicators for 25 cities.城市规划政策对健康和可持续性的支持:25 个城市政策指标的国际比较。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jun;10(6):e882-e894. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00069-9.
7
World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour.世界卫生组织 2020 年关于身体活动和 sedentary behaviour 的指南。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Dec;54(24):1451-1462. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955.
8
Urbanization: a problem for the rich and the poor?城市化:对富人和穷人而言都是问题吗?
Public Health Rev. 2020 Jan 2;41:1. doi: 10.1186/s40985-019-0116-0. eCollection 2020.
9
[Accessibility to public spaces for leisure and physical activity in adults in Curitiba, Paraná State, Brazil].[巴西巴拉那州库里蒂巴市成年人休闲及体育活动公共空间可达性研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2019 Nov 28;35(12):e00020719. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00020719. eCollection 2019.
10
Urban Green Space: Creating a Triple Win for Environmental Sustainability, Health, and Health Equity through Behavior Change.城市绿地:通过行为改变实现环境可持续性、健康和健康公平的三重共赢。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4403. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224403.