• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[动态血压记录在抗高血压药物治疗试验中的应用价值]

[Usefulness of ambulatory registration of arterial pressure in therapeutic trials of antihypertensive agents].

作者信息

Rion F, Waeber B, Graf H J, Jaussi A, Porchet M, Brunner H R

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1985 Dec 14;115(50):1829-31.

PMID:4089582
Abstract

In the context of a controlled antihypertensive drug trial, blood pressure readings obtained by the physician in his office were compared with ambulatory blood pressures recorded with the semi-automatic Remler device. The beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent timolol or methyldopa were administered in double-blind fashion to 30 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension. All exhibited a diastolic office blood pressure of greater than 95 mm Hg at the end of a 4-week placebo period. All patients then received a combination of hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg/d) and amiloride (2.5 mg/d). After 4 weeks of diuretic therapy, timolol (10 mg/d, n = 14) or methyldopa (250 mg/d, n = 16) were added randomly for 6 weeks. The dose of all antihypertensive agents was doubled after 2 weeks of therapy with diuretics combined with timolol (n = 7) or methyldopa (n = 16) because of the persistence of diastolic blood pressure levels of greater than 90 mm Hg at the office. When assessed in the office, the antihypertensive effect of timolol and methyldopa was similar. During ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, however, pressure levels tended to be lower in the patients given timolol (p less than 0.05 for the diastolic). These data show that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring may be very useful in comparing the antihypertensive efficacy of different drugs.

摘要

在一项对照性抗高血压药物试验中,将医生在其办公室测得的血压读数与用半自动Remler装置记录的动态血压进行了比较。以双盲方式给30例无并发症的原发性高血压患者服用β-肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂噻吗洛尔或甲基多巴。在为期4周的安慰剂期结束时,所有患者的办公室舒张压均高于95 mmHg。然后所有患者接受氢氯噻嗪(25 mg/d)和阿米洛利(2.5 mg/d)的联合治疗。利尿治疗4周后,随机加用噻吗洛尔(10 mg/d,n = 14)或甲基多巴(250 mg/d,n = 16),持续6周。由于在利尿剂联合噻吗洛尔(n = 7)或甲基多巴(n = 16)治疗2周后办公室舒张压持续高于90 mmHg,所有抗高血压药物的剂量在2周后加倍。在办公室评估时,噻吗洛尔和甲基多巴的抗高血压作用相似。然而,在动态血压监测期间,服用噻吗洛尔的患者血压水平往往较低(舒张压p<0.05)。这些数据表明,动态血压监测在比较不同药物的抗高血压疗效方面可能非常有用。

相似文献

1
[Usefulness of ambulatory registration of arterial pressure in therapeutic trials of antihypertensive agents].[动态血压记录在抗高血压药物治疗试验中的应用价值]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1985 Dec 14;115(50):1829-31.
2
Blood pressure response to antihypertensive therapy: ambulatory versus office blood pressure readings.抗高血压治疗的血压反应:动态血压与诊室血压读数对比
J Hypertens. 1985 Apr;3(2):139-43. doi: 10.1097/00004872-198504000-00005.
3
Shortcomings of office blood pressures in assessing antihypertensive therapy.诊室血压在评估降压治疗中的不足之处。
Clin Exp Hypertens A. 1985;7(2-3):291-8. doi: 10.3109/10641968509073549.
4
Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of the fixed dose combination enalapril 10 mg/nitrendipine 20 mg vs losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, assessed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, in essential hypertensive patients.通过24小时动态血压监测评估依那普利10毫克/尼群地平20毫克固定剂量复方制剂与氯沙坦50毫克/氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克对原发性高血压患者的降压效果比较。
J Hum Hypertens. 2004 Mar;18(3):215-22. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001655.
5
The antihypertensive efficacy of losartan and amlodipine assessed with office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Canadian Cozaar Hyzaar Amlodipine Trial Study Group.通过诊室和动态血压监测评估氯沙坦与氨氯地平的降压疗效。加拿大氯沙坦氢氯噻嗪氨氯地平试验研究组。
CMAJ. 1998 Sep 8;159(5):469-76.
6
Blood pressure-lowering efficacy of amiloride versus enalapril as add-on drugs in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure receiving hydrochlorothiazide.在接受氢氯噻嗪治疗但血压控制不佳的患者中,阿米洛利与依那普利作为附加药物的降压疗效比较。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2008 Oct;30(7):553-64. doi: 10.1080/10641960802441906.
7
[Evaluation by practicing physicians of the antihypertensive efficacy of debrisoquin, methyldopa and propranolol].[执业医师对降压嗪、甲基多巴和普萘洛尔降压疗效的评估]
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1983 Mar 5;113(9):331-8.
8
Multiclinic evaluation of the antihypertensive effect of a methyldopa, hydrochlorothiazine, and amiloride combination.甲基多巴、氢氯噻嗪和阿米洛利联合用药降压效果的多诊所评估
Clin Ther. 1980;3(3):168-75.
9
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a combination of once-daily losartan 100 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg compared with losartan 100-mg monotherapy in the treatment of mild to severe essential hypertension.一项多中心、随机、双盲、平行组试验,比较每日一次服用氯沙坦100毫克/氢氯噻嗪12.5毫克组合与氯沙坦100毫克单药治疗轻度至重度原发性高血压的降压疗效和耐受性。
Clin Ther. 2006 Oct;28(10):1639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.10.014.
10
Timolol and a hydrochlorothiazide-amiloride combination in the treatment of essential hypertension in young and middle-aged patients: a comparative study with once-daily administration.噻吗洛尔与氢氯噻嗪 - 阿米洛利联合用药治疗中青年原发性高血压:每日一次给药的对比研究
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1984 Dec;22(12):643-5.