Tiwari Narendra Prasad, Jiwane Rekha, Gupta Sonal, Raghuwanshi Gourav S
Department of Physiology, People's College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, IND.
Department of Physiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Bhopal, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88961. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88961. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Background Hypertension is a rising concern among young adults, driven by sedentary lifestyles, academic stress, and poor dietary habits. Medical students, despite being a theoretically low-risk group, exhibit a notable prevalence of elevated blood pressure. Traditional measures such as body mass index (BMI) fail to capture fat distribution, a critical determinant of cardiovascular risk. This study investigates the association of anthropometric indices - BMI, waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) - with systolic blood pressure (SBP), emphasizing gender-specific patterns in a population of medical students. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted among 250 medical students (175 males, 75 females) aged 17-25 years. Anthropometric measurements, including BMI, WC, and WHR, were recorded following standardized protocols. Blood pressure was measured using the auscultatory method, and elevated SBP (>120 mmHg) was defined per the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines. Chi-square (χ²) tests were used to assess associations between categorized anthropometric indices and SBP, with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Elevated SBP was observed in 24.0% of males (42 out of 175) and 25.3% of females (19 out of 75). Among males, significant associations were identified between elevated SBP and BMI (χ² = 13.097, p = 0.0003), WC (χ² = 10.075, p = 0.0015), and WHR (χ² = 8.701, p = 0.0032). In females, WC alone demonstrated a significant association with SBP (χ² = 6.329, p = 0.0119), while BMI (p = 0.1643) and WHR (p = 0.7844) did not. Comparative analysis highlighted BMI and WHR as stronger predictors of elevated SBP in males, whereas WC consistently emerged as the most significant predictor across both genders. Conclusion Central adiposity, as indicated by WC, is a pivotal predictor of SBP in young adults, reinforcing its clinical utility over BMI and WHR. Gender-specific trends highlight the pronounced role of BMI and WHR in males, while WC remains the sole significant predictor in females. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating WC measurements into routine screening protocols for early identification of at-risk individuals. Early, targeted interventions addressing central adiposity may play a crucial role in preventing the progression of hypertension and reducing cardiovascular morbidity in young adults.
由于久坐不动的生活方式、学业压力和不良饮食习惯,高血压在年轻人中日益受到关注。医学生尽管理论上属于低风险群体,但血压升高的患病率却相当显著。传统指标如体重指数(BMI)无法反映脂肪分布情况,而脂肪分布是心血管风险的关键决定因素。本研究调查了人体测量指标——BMI、腰围(WC)和腰臀比(WHR)——与收缩压(SBP)之间的关联,着重探讨了医学生群体中的性别差异模式。
对250名年龄在17 - 25岁的医学生(175名男性,75名女性)进行了横断面研究。按照标准化方案记录了包括BMI、WC和WHR在内的人体测量数据。采用听诊法测量血压,并根据2017年美国心脏病学会(ACC)和美国心脏协会(ACC/AHA)指南定义收缩压升高(>120 mmHg)。使用卡方(χ²)检验评估分类人体测量指标与SBP之间的关联,p < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
24.0%的男性(175名中的42名)和25.3%的女性(75名中的19名)收缩压升高。在男性中,收缩压升高与BMI(χ² = 13.097,p = 0.00³)、WC(χ² = 10.075,p = 0.0015)和WHR(χ² = 8.701,p = 0.0032)之间存在显著关联。在女性中,仅WC与SBP存在显著关联(χ² = 6.329,p = 0.0119),而BMI(p = 0.1643)和WHR(p = 0.7844)则无此关联。对比分析表明,BMI和WHR是男性收缩压升高的更强预测指标,而WC始终是两性中最显著的预测指标。
WC所表明的中心性肥胖是年轻人收缩压的关键预测指标,强化了其相对于BMI和WHR的临床实用性。性别差异趋势凸显了BMI和WHR在男性中的显著作用,而WC仍是女性中唯一显著的预测指标。这些发现强调了将WC测量纳入常规筛查方案以早期识别高危个体的重要性。针对中心性肥胖的早期、有针对性的干预措施可能在预防年轻人高血压进展和降低心血管发病率方面发挥关键作用。