• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版的英格兰服务使用者的产科护理体验:一项反思性主题分析

Service users' experiences of maternity care in England informed by the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle Version 2: A reflexive thematic analysis.

作者信息

Reid Holly E, Smith Debbie M, Widdows Kate, Heazell Alexander Ep

机构信息

Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018582.

DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018582
PMID:40897404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2019, NHS England launched the second version of the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCBv2), recommendations that maternity providers are expected to fully implement, in an ongoing effort to reduce stillbirths and preterm births. Although stillbirth rates have seen an overall significant reduction since the inception of the SBLCB, experiences of maternity care in England are deteriorating. This study aimed to explore service users' experiences of SBLCBv2-informed maternity care to help understand the aspects of care they received positively and those needing improvement.

METHODS

This qualitative study captured service users' experiences of receiving maternity care across England between November 2022 and December 2023. Purposive sampling was employed to include service users from diverse backgrounds with a variety of experiences of each element of SBLCBv2. Participants (n=29) were 16 years or older, had given birth within the previous 12 months and could comprehend and speak English. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via video call and the data analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four main themes with nine subthemes were developed: (1) feelings towards measuring and monitoring, (2) the importance of clear communication, (3) healthcare professionals' roles in decision-making and (4) belief in service users, trust in healthcare professionals. Each theme is discussed in relation to the five elements, and the 'Important Principles', of SBLCBv2.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings echo maternity care needs reported elsewhere in the literature, suggesting the interventions introduced in SBLCBv2 are generally acceptable but that information about SBLCBv2 must be personalised, and clearly presented, to each individual. Professionals play an important role in service users' decision-making, and participants' perceptions of how collaborative and supportive professionals were in decision-making processes varied. Believing service users and trusting professionals are of paramount importance for ensuring service users have positive maternity care experiences.

摘要

背景

2019年,英国国民保健制度(NHS)推出了第二版拯救婴儿生命护理包(SBLCBv2),这是一系列建议,产科服务提供者应全面实施,以持续努力减少死产和早产。尽管自SBLCB推出以来,死产率总体上有了显著下降,但英国的产科护理体验却在恶化。本研究旨在探讨服务使用者对基于SBLCBv2的产科护理的体验,以帮助了解他们得到积极护理的方面以及需要改进的方面。

方法

这项定性研究记录了2022年11月至2023年12月期间英国各地服务使用者接受产科护理的体验。采用目的抽样法,纳入来自不同背景、对SBLCBv2各要素有不同体验的服务使用者。参与者(n = 29)年龄在16岁及以上,在过去12个月内分娩,能够理解和说英语。通过视频通话进行半结构化访谈,并使用反思性主题分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

形成了四个主要主题和九个子主题:(1)对测量和监测的感受,(2)清晰沟通的重要性,(3)医疗保健专业人员在决策中的作用,(4)对服务使用者的信任、对医疗保健专业人员的信任。每个主题都结合SBLCBv2的五个要素和“重要原则”进行了讨论。

结论

我们的研究结果与文献中其他地方报道的产科护理需求相呼应,表明SBLCBv2中引入的干预措施总体上是可以接受的,但关于SBLCBv2的信息必须针对每个个体进行个性化且清晰的呈现。专业人员在服务使用者的决策中起着重要作用,参与者对专业人员在决策过程中的协作和支持程度的看法各不相同。相信服务使用者并信任专业人员对于确保服务使用者有积极的产科护理体验至关重要。

相似文献

1
Service users' experiences of maternity care in England informed by the Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle Version 2: A reflexive thematic analysis.基于拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版的英格兰服务使用者的产科护理体验:一项反思性主题分析
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2025-018582.
2
Evaluating the implementation of the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 from service user and healthcare professionals' perspectives: a questionnaire study.从服务使用者和医疗保健专业人员的角度评估《拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版》的实施情况:一项问卷调查研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Sep 2;14(3):e003456. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456.
3
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
5
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
8
"It's a tool, it's got hardships": a qualitative study of patient experience of colonoscopy and implications for trauma-informed care.“这是一种工具,会有艰难之处”:一项关于结肠镜检查患者体验及对创伤知情护理影响的定性研究
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 21;18:17562848251346250. doi: 10.1177/17562848251346250. eCollection 2025.
9
Evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed-method study.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)低热量饮食实施试点评估:一项联合开展的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(29):1-63. doi: 10.3310/MPRT2139.
10
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.