• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国面部提升手术的流行病学和经济因素:一项回顾性多中心分析

Epidemiological and Economic Factors in Facelift Surgery in the USA: A Retrospective Multi-center Analysis.

作者信息

Knoedler Leonard, Lellouch Alexandre G, Aguglia Raffaele, Sadati Kevin, Knoedler Samuel, Kehrer Andreas, Cetrulo Curtis L, Rendenbach Carsten, Heiland Max, Fenske Jakob

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05221-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00266-025-05221-z
PMID:40897962
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The demand for surgical facial rejuvenation procedures, such as facelifts, has risen in recent decades. However, limited research has addressed the epidemiological and economic aspects of these procedures. This study examines trends in facelift surgeries using data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database.

METHODS

The HCUP-NIS database, which includes all-payer inpatient cases in the USA, was analyzed for facelift procedures identified through ICD-10 codes from 2016 to 2020. A total of 723 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, hospitalization details, and procedural characteristics were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Exploratory comparisons were made across the three surgical technique subgroups, as allocated in ICD-10 procedural coding: open, percutaneous, and percutaneous endoscopic.

RESULTS

The cohort included 723 patients, with a mean age of 56.7 ± 16.2 years, predominantly female (79.4%) and White (81%). Most patients were self-paying (63.2%) and of high-income status (50.8%). Higher-income individuals were more likely to undergo minimally invasive procedures. The average hospital stay was 1.7 ± 1.6 days, with total costs averaging $85,259.60 ± $63,152.80. The most common indication was plastic surgery due to cosmetic reasons. Facelift was also performed for gender dysphoria indications in 12.3% of the cases. Hypertension (18.8%) and nicotine abuse (13.7%) were the most frequent comorbidities.

CONCLUSION

The results highlight the complex epidemiological and economic environment of inpatient facelift surgery. Procedures are subject to significant regional and socioeconomic disparities. The growing role of facial feminization and heterogenous surgical access warrants further research on emerging trends in esthetic facial surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

近几十年来,对面部年轻化手术(如面部提升术)的需求有所增加。然而,针对这些手术的流行病学和经济方面的研究有限。本研究利用医疗成本与利用项目(HCUP)国家住院患者样本(NIS)数据库中的数据,考察面部提升手术的趋势。

方法

对HCUP-NIS数据库进行分析,该数据库包含美国所有支付方的住院病例,通过2016年至2020年的ICD-10编码识别面部提升手术。共有723名患者符合纳入标准。使用描述性统计评估患者人口统计学、住院细节和手术特征。按照ICD-10手术编码划分的三个手术技术亚组进行探索性比较:开放式、经皮式和经皮内窥镜式。

结果

该队列包括723名患者,平均年龄为56.7±16.2岁,主要为女性(79.4%)和白人(81%)。大多数患者为自费(63.2%)且为高收入状态(50.8%)。高收入个体更有可能接受微创手术。平均住院时间为1.7±1.6天,总成本平均为85,259.60±63,152.80美元。最常见的适应症是出于美容原因的整形手术。12.3%的病例中面部提升手术也用于性别焦虑症适应症。高血压(18.8%)和尼古丁滥用(13.7%)是最常见的合并症。

结论

结果凸显了住院面部提升手术复杂的流行病学和经济环境。手术存在显著的地区和社会经济差异。面部女性化的作用日益增加以及手术途径的异质性,值得对面部美容手术的新趋势进行进一步研究。

证据水平III:本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266 。

相似文献

1
Epidemiological and Economic Factors in Facelift Surgery in the USA: A Retrospective Multi-center Analysis.美国面部提升手术的流行病学和经济因素:一项回顾性多中心分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05221-z.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Early Relapse After Facelift.面部提升术后早期复发的系统评价与荟萃分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Feb;47(1):144-155. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-02894-8. Epub 2022 May 9.
4
Elective THA for Indications Other Than Osteoarthritis Is Associated With Increased Cost and Resource Use: A Medicare Database Study of 135,194 Claims.择期全髋关节置换术用于治疗非骨关节炎的适应证与更高的成本和资源利用相关:一项基于 Medicare 数据库的 135194 例患者的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1159-1170. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002922. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
5
The Facelift After Thread Lifting: Surgical and Aesthetic Complications.埋线提升术后的面部提升术:手术及美学并发症
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05091-5.
6
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
9
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation.压力性尿失禁女性的外科治疗:ESTER系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Mar;23(14):1-306. doi: 10.3310/hta23140.

本文引用的文献

1
Is #Gender Affirmation Surgery Trending? An Analysis of Plastic Surgery Residency Social Media Content.性别肯定手术正在流行吗?对整形外科学术住院医师社交媒体内容的分析。
Transgend Health. 2024 Jun 17;9(3):254-263. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2021.0215. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Isolated and combined breast augmentation in transgender patients: Multi-institutional insights into early outcomes and risk factors. transgender 患者的孤立性和联合性乳房增大术:多机构对早期结果和风险因素的见解。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Mar;90:149-160. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.026. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Area-Level Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Health Care Spending: A Systematic Review.
区域层面的社会经济劣势与医疗保健支出:系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2356121. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.56121.
4
Evidence of Hematoma Prevention After Facelift.面部提升术后血肿预防的证据。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Jan 16;44(2):134-143. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad247.
5
Comparing Trends in Medicare Reimbursement and Inflation within Plastic Surgery Subspecialties.比较整形外科亚专业领域医疗保险报销与通货膨胀的趋势。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Apr 1;153(4):957-962. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010697. Epub 2023 May 16.
6
Health Care Value in Plastic Surgery Practice.整形外科学实践中的医疗保健价值。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 May 1;153(5):1175-1183. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010638. Epub 2023 May 15.
7
The Price Is Right? An Economic Analysis of Factors Influencing Cosmetic Surgery Prices.《价格合理吗?影响整容手术价格的因素的经济分析》。
Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Aug 17;43(9):1036-1045. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjad072.
8
Advances in Face-Lift Surgical Techniques: 2016-2021.面部提升手术技术进展:2016 - 2021年
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;47(2):622-630. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03017-z. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
9
Facial Gender Surgery: Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Consensus Guidelines from the International Facial Gender Symposium.面部性别手术:国际面部性别研讨会的系统评价和基于证据的共识指南。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jan 1;149(1):212-224. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008668.
10
Who is talking about #Facelift on Instagram?谁在Instagram上谈论#面部提升?
Eur J Plast Surg. 2022;45(3):415-420. doi: 10.1007/s00238-021-01909-y. Epub 2021 Dec 2.