Başar Kilic Şeyma, Kulu Huzeyfe, Salman Hüseyin, Bektaş Murat
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Aksaray University, Faculty of Medicine, Aksaray, Türkiye.
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Antalya City Hospital, Antalya, Türkiye.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 29;104(35):e44013. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044013.
Psoriasis (PsO) is a chronic immune-mediated disease that affects the skin and nails. Several screening tools such as psoriasis epidemiology screening tool, psoriatic arthritis screening and evaluation, early arthritis for psoriatic patients (EARP), STRIPP, SIPAS, and TOPAS have been developed and validated for identifying patients with suspected psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in dermatology clinics. Herein, we aim to validate and evaluate the performance of TurPAS in patients with PsO compared to the EARP questionnaire. This cross-sectional study was carried out in collaboration between dermatology and rheumatology clinics at Aksaray University Hospital, a tertiary referral center. All patients were examined for dermatologic aspects in the dermatology outpatient clinic and TurPAS and EARP questionnaires were performed by the same dermatologist. The patients who met the CASPAR criteria were classified as PsA in addition to appropriate clinical findings. In our study, 119 patients (n = 72; 60.5% female) with PsO were included. Mean ± standard deviation age of the patients was 44.9 ± 14.3 (range; 18-83) years and the median (IQR) PsO duration was 10 (14) years. Median (IQR) TurPAS and EARP scores were 2 (3) and 3 (5), respectively. Overall, 39 patients (32.8%) met the CASPAR criteria and were classified as PsA. The best diagnostic accuracy was observed in ≥ 3 positive items with 82% and 70% sensitivity and specificity (positive predictive value: 57.1%, negative predictive value: 89%, likelihood ratio: 2.7, diagnostic accuracy: 74%) for TurPAS and ≥ 4 items with 74.4% and 86.3% (positive predictive value: 72.5%, negative predictive value: 87.3%, likelihood ratio: 5.4, diagnostic accuracy: 82.4%) for EARP. In our study, approximately one-third of patients with PsO were diagnosed as PsA. TurPAS had acceptable diagnostic performance compared to the EARP questionnaire.
银屑病(PsO)是一种影响皮肤和指甲的慢性免疫介导性疾病。已经开发并验证了多种筛查工具,如银屑病流行病学筛查工具、银屑病关节炎筛查与评估、银屑病患者早期关节炎(EARP)、STRIPP、SIPAS和TOPAS,用于在皮肤科诊所识别疑似银屑病关节炎(PsA)的患者。在此,我们旨在验证和评估TurPAS与EARP问卷相比在PsO患者中的性能。这项横断面研究是在阿克萨赖大学医院(一家三级转诊中心)的皮肤科和风湿病科诊所合作下进行的。所有患者在皮肤科门诊接受皮肤病学方面的检查,TurPAS和EARP问卷由同一位皮肤科医生进行。符合CASPAR标准且有适当临床发现的患者被归类为PsA。在我们的研究中,纳入了119例PsO患者(n = 72;60.5%为女性)。患者的平均年龄±标准差为44.9±14.3(范围:18 - 83)岁,PsO病程的中位数(IQR)为10(14)年。TurPAS和EARP评分的中位数(IQR)分别为2(3)和3(5)。总体而言,39例患者(32.8%)符合CASPAR标准并被归类为PsA。对于TurPAS,≥3个阳性项目时观察到最佳诊断准确性,敏感性和特异性分别为82%和70%(阳性预测值:57.1%,阴性预测值:89%,似然比:2.7,诊断准确性:74%);对于EARP,≥4个项目时,敏感性和特异性分别为74.4%和86.3%(阳性预测值:72.5%,阴性预测值:87.3%,似然比:5.4,诊断准确性:82.4%)。在我们的研究中,约三分之一的PsO患者被诊断为PsA。与EARP问卷相比,TurPAS具有可接受的诊断性能。