Suppr超能文献

杠杆操纵对房地产企业财务风险的影响:基于利益冲突视角

The effect of leverage manipulation on real estate firms' financial risk: Based on the interest conflicts perspective.

作者信息

Huang Liwen, Yu Liangxing, Huang Wei

机构信息

School of Business, Jishou University, Jishou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0330709. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330709. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

From the perspective of interest conflicts, this study investigates the relationship between corporate leverage manipulation and financial risk using a sample of A-share listed real estate firms in China from 2009 to 2023. Employing a two-way fixed effects model, the main findings are as follows: (1) Leverage manipulation significantly increases the level of financial risk among real estate firms; (2) Mechanism analysis reveals a collusion effect between controlling shareholders and management, as well as between external auditors and management, both of which significantly amplify the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk. These findings support the collusion effect hypothesis and reject the monitoring effect hypothesis; (3) Heterogeneity tests show that the impact of leverage manipulation on financial risk is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, in firms dominated by transactional institutional investors, and in regions with lower reliance on land finance. This study uncovers the intrinsic link between leverage manipulation and financial risk in the real estate sector and provides important policy implications for regulators aiming to improve and standardize financial risk management in the industry.

摘要

从利益冲突的角度出发,本研究以2009年至2023年中国A股上市房地产企业为样本,考察了企业杠杆操纵与财务风险之间的关系。采用双向固定效应模型,主要研究结果如下:(1)杠杆操纵显著提高了房地产企业的财务风险水平;(2)机制分析揭示了控股股东与管理层之间以及外部审计师与管理层之间的合谋效应,这两者均显著放大了杠杆操纵对财务风险的影响。这些发现支持合谋效应假说,拒绝监督效应假说;(3)异质性检验表明,杠杆操纵对财务风险的影响在非国有企业、以交易性机构投资者为主的企业以及对土地财政依赖程度较低的地区更为显著。本研究揭示了房地产行业杠杆操纵与财务风险之间的内在联系,并为旨在改善和规范该行业金融风险管理的监管机构提供了重要的政策启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e88/12407431/250ff030e4e8/pone.0330709.g001.jpg

相似文献

6
Population aging and corporate tax avoidance: Suppression or promotion?人口老龄化与企业避税:抑制还是促进?
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 11;20(8):e0316211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316211. eCollection 2025.
10
Innovation and valuation of Chinese born-global firms.中国天生国际化企业的创新与估值
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 27;20(6):e0325214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325214. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
The nexus between corporate governance, risk taking, and growth.公司治理、风险承担与增长之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 4;15(2):e0228371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228371. eCollection 2020.
2
Social Performance and Firm Risk: Impact of the Financial Crisis.社会绩效与企业风险:金融危机的影响
J Bus Ethics. 2018;149(3):643-669. doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3017-x. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验