Suppr超能文献

FLASH临床试验的质量保证与报告:FEATHER试验的经验

Quality assurance and reporting for FLASH clinical trials: The experience of the FEATHER trial.

作者信息

Colizzi Isabella, Schäfer Robert, Brückner Jonas, Dellepiane Gaia, Grossmann Martin, Körner Maximilian, Lomax Antony John, Meer David, Rohrer Benno, Bley Carla Rohrer, Togno Michele, Psoroulas Serena

机构信息

Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen PSI, Switzerland.

Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2025 Sep;52(9):e18100. doi: 10.1002/mp.18100.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research on ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) radiation therapy has indicated its potential to spare normal tissue while maintaining equivalent tumor control compared to conventional treatments. First clinical trials are underway. The randomized phase II/III FEATHER clinical trial at the Paul Scherrer Institute in collaboration with the University of Zurich Animal Hospital is one of the first curative domestic animal trials to be attempted, and it is designed to provide a good example for human trials. However, the lack of standardized quality assurance (QA) guidelines for FLASH clinical trials presents a significant challenge in trial design.

PURPOSE

This work aims to demonstrate the development and testing of QA and reporting procedures implemented in the FEATHER clinical trial.

METHODS

We have expanded the clinical QA program to include UHDR-specific QA and additional patient-specific QA. Furthermore, we have modified the monitor readout to enable time-resolved measurements, allowing delivery log files to be used for dose and dose rate recalculations. Finally, we developed a reporting strategy encompassing relevant parameters for retrospective studies.

RESULTS

We evaluated our QA and reporting procedures with simulated treatments. This testing confirmed that our QA procedures effectively ensure the correct and safe delivery of the planned dose (3%/3 mm gamma criteria, pass > 90%). Additionally, we demonstrated that we could reconstruct the delivered dose and dose rate using the delivery log files.

CONCLUSION

We developed and used in practice a comprehensive QA and reporting protocol for a FLASH clinical trial at the Paul Scherrer Institute. This work aims to establish guidelines and standardize reporting practices for future advancements in the FLASH-RT field.

摘要

背景

超高剂量率(UHDR)放射治疗的研究表明,与传统治疗相比,它在保护正常组织的同时保持等效肿瘤控制效果方面具有潜力。首批临床试验正在进行中。保罗·谢尔研究所与苏黎世大学动物医院合作开展的随机II/III期FEATHER临床试验是首批尝试的治疗性家畜试验之一,旨在为人体试验提供良好范例。然而,缺乏针对FLASH临床试验的标准化质量保证(QA)指南给试验设计带来了重大挑战。

目的

本研究旨在展示FEATHER临床试验中实施的QA及报告程序的制定与测试。

方法

我们扩展了临床QA程序,纳入了UHDR特定的QA以及额外的患者特定QA。此外,我们修改了监测读数以实现时间分辨测量,使传输日志文件可用于剂量和剂量率的重新计算。最后,我们制定了一种报告策略,涵盖回顾性研究的相关参数。

结果

我们通过模拟治疗评估了QA和报告程序。该测试证实,我们的QA程序有效地确保了计划剂量的正确和安全传输(3%/3毫米伽马标准,通过率>90%)。此外,我们证明可以使用传输日志文件重建传输剂量和剂量率。

结论

我们在实践中为保罗·谢尔研究所的FLASH临床试验开发并使用了全面的QA和报告方案。这项工作旨在为FLASH-RT领域的未来发展建立指南并规范报告实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验