Monareng Luther Lebogang, Soeker Shaheed Mogammad, Naidoo Deshini
Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
University College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0331576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331576. eCollection 2025.
Despite robust global and national efforts to promote inclusive development, a significant gap persists in countries such as South Africa's self-employment policies for persons with disabilities. The existing legislative framework, although well-intentioned, lacks clear and comprehensive guidance on self-employment as a viable placement option for persons with disabilities. Consequently, this ambiguity hinders effective policy implementation, limiting economic empowerment and social inclusion. This research aimed to explore the existence of self-employment-specific policies for persons with disabilities and policy actors' involved in South Africa.
The participants (n = 47) had an average of 10 years of experience in self-employment for persons with disabilities, holding qualifications ranging from no formal education to master's degrees. This qualitative study ensured transparent and systematic reporting using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines. Purposive and snowball sampling were utilised to recruit participants. Data were collected using a piloted question guide and analysed using the NVIVO software. Data was analysed thematically. Ethics clearance, relevant gatekeepers' permission and informed written consent from participants were obtained.
Two themes emerged, namely, theme one: The status quo on self-employment-specific policies for persons with disabilities. Participants reported on the absence of explicit policies on self-employment for persons with disabilities, the lack of effectiveness in inclusive South African legal frameworks and their lack of impact on promoting self-employment opportunities. Theme two: policy actors' involvement in self-employment-specific policies for persons with disabilities. Participants reported on the roles and responsibilities of policy actors and strategies to promote self-employment opportunities for persons with disabilities through policy reforms.
The research revealed a complex policy landscape where the absence of self-employment-specific policies for persons with disabilities coexists with potentially leverageable inclusive frameworks. These coexist with potential policy actors who have the potential to facilitate implementation. Leveraging existing policies through effective implementation and targeted policy reforms would ensure the full participation of persons with disabilities in self-employment. Key policy actors should familiarise themselves with the existing legal framework and emphasise enforcement and consequence management to ensure policies are implemented effectively. Furthermore, a coordinated approach is necessary, involving: a single or integrated system or database to streamline policy implementation and monitoring; a targeted approach that prioritises persons with disabilities in self-employment; and policies that allow for target setting, accurate measurement of targets, and effective monitoring and evaluation. Thus, a policy brief outlining the key findings should be considered, drafted, and submitted to the relevant government department (e.g., Department of Employment and Labour) for further action.
尽管全球和各国都在大力推动包容性发展,但在南非等国家,残疾人自营职业政策仍存在显著差距。现有的立法框架虽出于善意,但缺乏关于将自营职业作为残疾人可行安置选择的明确而全面的指导。因此,这种模糊性阻碍了政策的有效实施,限制了经济赋权和社会包容。本研究旨在探索南非针对残疾人的特定自营职业政策的存在情况以及参与其中的政策行为者。
参与者(n = 47)平均有10年残疾人自营职业经验,学历从无正规教育到硕士学位不等。这项定性研究使用《定性研究报告综合标准》(COREQ)指南确保透明和系统的报告。采用目的抽样和滚雪球抽样来招募参与者。使用试点问题指南收集数据,并使用NVIVO软件进行分析。数据进行主题分析。获得了伦理批准、相关把关人的许可以及参与者的知情书面同意。
出现了两个主题,即主题一:针对残疾人的特定自营职业政策的现状。参与者报告称缺乏针对残疾人自营职业的明确政策,南非包容性法律框架缺乏有效性,且对促进自营职业机会缺乏影响。主题二:政策行为者参与针对残疾人特定自营职业政策。参与者报告了政策行为者的角色和职责,以及通过政策改革促进残疾人自营职业机会的策略。
研究揭示了一个复杂的政策格局,即针对残疾人的特定自营职业政策缺失,同时存在潜在可利用的包容性框架。这些与有促进实施潜力的潜在政策行为者并存。通过有效实施和有针对性的政策改革来利用现有政策,将确保残疾人充分参与自营职业。关键政策行为者应熟悉现有法律框架,强调执法和后果管理,以确保政策得到有效实施。此外,需要一种协调一致的方法,包括:一个单一或综合的系统或数据库,以简化政策实施和监测;一种有针对性的方法,将残疾人在自营职业中作为优先考虑对象;以及允许设定目标、准确衡量目标并进行有效监测和评估的政策。因此,应考虑起草一份概述主要研究结果的政策简报,并提交给相关政府部门(如就业和劳动部)采取进一步行动。