Suppr超能文献

关于激素替代疗法(或绝经激素疗法)的在线信息是否反映了《英国国家处方集》的适应症以及英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的指南:一项对英国媒体的横断面研究

Does online information about hormone replacement therapy (or menopause hormone therapy) reflect indications from the British National Formulary and guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: a cross-sectional study of UK media.

作者信息

McCartney Margaret, Morgan-Young Rosa, Sullivan Frank, Murphy Deirdre J, Albulushi Jahan, Larkin James

机构信息

University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK

University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 4;15(9):e094773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094773.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe: (1) the most visible information (from individuals or organisations) on UK social media regarding hormone replacement therapy (HRT)/menopause hormone treatment for menopause; (2) claims made by these sources for HRT and testosterone outwith the indications specified by the British National Formulary (BNF) and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (ie, vasomotor instability, vaginal dryness, low mood associated with the menopause and, for testosterone, low libido after treatment with HRT) and for use for the prevention of future ill health and (3) conflicts of interest of commentators.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Online references to HRT, for use in menopause, in UK online media, comprising Facebook, Google, Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, 30 top ranked hits between 1 January 2022 and 1 June 2023 and Twitter (X) up to 1 May 2024.

METHODS

Identification of the most visible information was performed via online searching with the term 'HRT' using incognito searches within each modality. Statements making claims were identified and analysed as to whether they were congruent with BNF and NICE advice on indications for use. Declarations of interest were extracted from the source or searched for if not apparent using a standardised search strategy. Data were entered into an Excel spreadsheet. Summary and descriptive statistics were used to summarise the results, including description of origin and types of claims, percentage of claims in agreement with NICE/BNF indications, relationship to financial interests and readership data, where available.

RESULTS

180 recommendations and/or claims for HRT were examined (30 from each of six platforms), made by professional individuals (53.4%), laypeople (41.7%) and patient, media and professional organisations (4.9%) completing the total. Overall, 67.2% of claims were outside of BNF/NICE recommendations. 139 (77.2%) were associated with a conflict of interest. In 117 cases, this was a conflict either directly or indirectly related to menopause, through provision of private practice, pharmaceutical industry funding or retail products marketed at the menopause.

CONCLUSIONS

Social media commonly contains claims for HRT outside BNF/NICE guidance. Conflicts of interest by commentators are also common, directly or indirectly related to menopause. Less than a quarter of media contained no commercial conflict. Policymakers should consider means to ensure that non-conflicted, evidence-based information is visible to professionals, patients and the public.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/r7e5c/).

摘要

目的

描述:(1) 英国社交媒体上关于激素替代疗法(HRT)/绝经激素治疗最显著的信息(来自个人或组织);(2) 这些信息来源针对HRT和睾酮提出的、超出英国国家处方集(BNF)和英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)规定适应症(即血管舒缩不稳定、阴道干燥、与绝经相关的情绪低落,以及对于睾酮,HRT治疗后性欲低下)以及用于预防未来疾病的说法;(3) 评论者的利益冲突。

设计

横断面研究。

背景

英国在线媒体(包括Facebook、谷歌、Instagram、TikTok和YouTube)中2022年1月1日至2023年6月1日期间排名前30的搜索结果以及截至2024年5月1日的推特(X)上关于用于绝经的HRT的在线参考资料。

方法

通过在每种模式下使用隐身搜索,以“HRT”为关键词进行在线搜索,确定最显著的信息。识别并分析提出说法的声明,看其是否符合BNF和NICE关于使用适应症的建议。从信息来源中提取利益声明,若未明确声明,则使用标准化搜索策略进行查找。数据录入Excel电子表格。使用汇总和描述性统计来总结结果,包括声明的来源和类型描述、符合NICE/BNF适应症的声明百分比、与经济利益的关系以及读者数据(如可用)。

结果

共审查了180条关于HRT的建议和/或说法(六个平台各30条),由专业人士(53.4%)、非专业人士(41.7%)以及患者、媒体和专业组织(4.9%)提出。总体而言,67.2%的说法超出了BNF/NICE的建议。139条(77.2%)与利益冲突有关。在117个案例中,这种冲突直接或间接与绝经相关,通过提供私人执业服务、制药行业资助或针对绝经人群销售的零售产品。

结论

社交媒体上常见超出BNF/NICE指南的HRT说法。评论者的利益冲突也很常见,直接或间接与绝经相关。不到四分之一的媒体没有商业冲突。政策制定者应考虑采取措施,确保专业人士、患者和公众能够看到无利益冲突的循证信息。

试验注册号

开放科学框架(https://osf.io/r7e5c/)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a45f/12414175/d4562c3ef479/bmjopen-15-9-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验