Wang Claire, Sakita Francis M, Sumner Spencer, Shayo Frida M, Martin Zebadia, Msangi Winnie, Munisi James J, Mulesi Elly, Aboud Ayshat M, Bettger Janet P, Bosworth Hayden B, Hertz Julian T
Duke University School of Medicine 0009-0000-6543-9768.
Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre.
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 29:rs.3.rs-7368551. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7368551/v1.
The Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Acute Myocardial Infarction Care (MIMIC) was developed to address gaps in AMI diagnosis and treatment in northern Tanzania. Although initial implementation was promising, many quality improvement interventions are not sustained after research support ends, especially in resource-limited settings. Evaluating sustainability and normalization is essential for understanding the long-term impact of implementation research. We evaluated these outcomes for the MIMIC intervention in a Tanzanian emergency department following a pilot implementation trial.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all full-time emergency department clinicians (n = 35) at Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (KCMC) using two validated implementation science tools: the Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) and the Normalization MeAsure Development (NoMAD) questionnaire. The CSAT assesses seven domains, with higher scores reflecting greater perceived sustainability. The NoMAD measures four constructs, with higher scores indicating stronger normalization. For each domain, scores were summarized descriptively (means, standard deviations) and compared by provider type (doctors vs. registered nurses) using independent t-tests.
All 35 eligible clinicians (100%) completed the survey. Mean CSAT domain scores ranged from 5.81 (SD 1.04) for to 6.73 (SD 0.47) for (scale 1-7). Mean NoMAD scores were uniformly high and clustered within a narrow range from 4.26 (SD 0.51) for to 4.69 (SD 0.42) for (scale 1-5). Nurses reported significantly greater than doctors (mean 6.76 vs. 6.20, p = 0.034); no other domains differed significantly by provider type. Domains related to perceived clinical benefit, individual engagement, and feedback scored highest, whereas organizational context and financial support scored comparatively lower.
This study is among the first to apply the CSAT and NoMAD tools to evaluate a quality improvement intervention in sub-Saharan Africa. Findings indicate that MIMIC is both highly sustainable and normalized in routine care at KCMC, as reflected by consistently high mean domain scores across both instruments, although formal thresholds for these measures have not yet been established. Strengthening organizational capacity and long-term support, particularly financing and team coordination, may further enhance sustained implementation.
为解决坦桑尼亚北部急性心肌梗死(AMI)诊断和治疗方面的差距,开展了改善急性心肌梗死护理多组分干预措施(MIMIC)。尽管初步实施效果良好,但许多质量改进干预措施在研究支持结束后难以持续,尤其是在资源有限的环境中。评估可持续性和常态化对于理解实施研究的长期影响至关重要。在一项试点实施试验后,我们在坦桑尼亚的一个急诊科评估了MIMIC干预措施的这些结果。
我们使用两种经过验证的实施科学工具:临床可持续性评估工具(CSAT)和常态化测量发展(NoMAD)问卷,对乞力马扎罗基督教医疗中心(KCMC)急诊科的所有全职临床医生(n = 35)进行了横断面调查。CSAT评估七个领域,得分越高表明感知到的可持续性越强。NoMAD测量四个结构,得分越高表明常态化越强。对于每个领域,对得分进行描述性总结(均值、标准差),并使用独立t检验按提供者类型(医生与注册护士)进行比较。
所有35名符合条件的临床医生(100%)完成了调查。CSAT领域平均得分范围从[具体领域1]的5.81(标准差1.04)到[具体领域2]的6.73(标准差0.47)(范围1 - 7)。NoMAD平均得分普遍较高,集中在较窄范围内,从[具体结构1]的4.26(标准差0.51)到[具体结构2]的4.69(标准差0.42)(范围1 - 5)。护士报告的[具体方面]显著高于医生(均值6.76对6.20,p = 0.034);其他领域在提供者类型上无显著差异。与感知到的临床益处、个人参与度和反馈相关的领域得分最高,而组织背景和财务支持得分相对较低。
本研究是首批应用CSAT和NoMAD工具评估撒哈拉以南非洲质量改进干预措施的研究之一。研究结果表明,MIMIC在KCMC的常规护理中具有高度可持续性和常态化,这体现在两种工具的平均领域得分始终较高,尽管这些测量的正式阈值尚未确定。加强组织能力和长期支持特别是融资和团队协调,可能会进一步促进持续实施。