Yang Eunyeong, Yoo Gyu Sang, Park Hee Chul, Kim Tae Gyu, Kim Dae Yong, Choi Jin-Hwa, Cho Yong Beom, Kim Nalee, Yu Jeong Il
Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, South Korea.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18146-3.
Lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) metastasis is a poor prognostic factor in rectal cancer, but the optimal management strategy is debated. This multicenter retrospective study investigated the role of LPLN dissection (LPLND), with total mesorectal excision (TME), after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT), aiming to identify patients who may benefit from LPLND.
A total of 559 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and LPLN involvement from 2009 to 2018 were included (KROG 22-09). Patients underwent either LPLND (n = 189) or no LPLND (n = 370) with TME post-nCRT. The lateral pelvic recurrence-free rate (LRFR) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize confounders.
Before PSM, the LPLND group had more advanced disease, higher tumor marker levels, and larger LPLNs before and after nCRT (median longest short axis [LSA]: 8.5 versus 6.3 mm, p < 0.001; 5.0 versus 4.2 mm, p < 0.001, respectively). With a median follow-up of 62 (interquartile range, 43-95) months, there was no difference in the 5-year LRFR (89.3% versus 91.9%, p = 0.130) and RFS (65.1% versus 72.0%, p = 0.083) between the LPLND and no LPLND groups. PSM analysis (130 patients) also showed no difference in LRFR (93.5% versus 89.2%, p = 0.450) and RFS (68.6% versus 67.2%, p = 0.710). Notably, LPLND significantly improved LRFR in patients with post-nCRT LPLN LSA ≥ 5 mm (98.0% versus 80.9%, p = 0.033).
LPLND did not significantly reduce pelvic recurrence or improve survival in patients treated with nCRT. However, LPLND may benefit patients with post-nCRT LPLN LSA ≥ 5 mm, suggesting that patient selection is crucial.
侧方盆腔淋巴结(LPLN)转移是直肠癌预后不良的因素,但最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。这项多中心回顾性研究调查了新辅助放化疗(nCRT)后行侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPLND)联合全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的作用,旨在确定可能从LPLND中获益的患者。
纳入2009年至2018年共559例局部晚期直肠癌伴LPLN受累的患者(KROG 22 - 09)。患者在nCRT后行TME时,分别接受了LPLND(n = 189)或未接受LPLND(n = 370)。评估侧方盆腔无复发生存率(LRFR)和无复发生存期(RFS)。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)以尽量减少混杂因素。
在PSM之前,LPLND组疾病进展更严重,肿瘤标志物水平更高,nCRT前后LPLN更大(中位最长短轴[LSA]:8.5对6.3 mm,p < 0.001;5.0对4.2 mm,p < 0.001)。中位随访62(四分位间距,43 - 95)个月,LPLND组和未行LPLND组的5年LRFR(89.3%对91.9%,p = 0.130)和RFS(65.1%对72.0%,p = 0.083)无差异。PSM分析(130例患者)也显示LRFR(93.5%对89.2%,p = 0.450)和RFS(68.6%对67.2%,p = 0.710)无差异。值得注意的是,nCRT后LPLN LSA≥5 mm的患者中,LPLND显著提高了LRFR(98.0%对80.9%,p = 0.033)。
LPLND并未显著降低接受nCRT治疗患者的盆腔复发率或改善生存率。然而,LPLND可能使nCRT后LPLN LSA≥5 mm的患者获益,这表明患者选择至关重要。