• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国年轻患者多个原发性肿瘤之间的患者内基因组差异。

Intrapatient genomic divergence across multiple primary tumors in young Korean patients.

作者信息

Choi Yoon Young

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug;21(2):90-97. doi: 10.14216/kjco.25359. Epub 2025 Aug 31.

DOI:10.14216/kjco.25359
PMID:40916402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12415424/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Multiple primary tumors arising in the same individual pose challenges for precision oncology, particularly in the context of hereditary cancer syndromes such as Lynch syndrome. While these tumors may originate from a shared germline predisposition, it remains unclear whether they also share somatic alterations that could be therapeutically exploited. This study aimed to characterize the extent of somatic genomic overlap between synchronous or metachronous gastric and colorectal cancers within young Korean patients.

METHODS

Nineteen patients diagnosed with both gastric and colorectal cancers before age 55 underwent whole exome sequencing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. Microsatellite instability (MSI) status was determined, and germline mismatch repair (MMR) variants were assessed to identify Lynch syndrome cases. Somatic mutations, mutational signatures, and copy number alterations were analyzed to quantify intertumoral genomic similarity within individual patients.

RESULTS

Among the 37 tumors analyzed, 36.8% of gastric and 44.4% of colorectal cancers were MSI-high. Germline pathogenic MMR variants were identified in seven patients. Despite shared hypermutated phenotypes, the proportion of overlapping somatic mutations between paired tumors was consistently low (< 5%). Mutational signatures varied by MSI status and included SBS1/5 (aging) and SBS15 (MMR deficiency). Notably, one non-Lynch patient exhibited MYC amplification in both tumors, confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

CONCLUSION

Even in patients with shared germline predisposition, primary tumors arising in different organs demonstrate substantial genomic divergence. These findings suggest that organ-specific selective pressures drive independent tumor evolution, underscoring the need for individualized molecular profiling and therapeutic targeting in cases of multiple primary cancers.

摘要

目的

同一个体出现的多个原发性肿瘤对精准肿瘤学构成挑战,尤其是在林奇综合征等遗传性癌症综合征的背景下。虽然这些肿瘤可能源于共同的种系易感性,但它们是否也共享可用于治疗的体细胞改变仍不清楚。本研究旨在描述年轻韩国患者中同步或异时性胃癌和结直肠癌之间体细胞基因组重叠的程度。

方法

19例在55岁之前被诊断为胃癌和结直肠癌的患者接受了福尔马林固定石蜡包埋肿瘤组织的全外显子测序。确定微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态,并评估种系错配修复(MMR)变异以识别林奇综合征病例。分析体细胞突变、突变特征和拷贝数改变,以量化个体患者肿瘤间的基因组相似性。

结果

在分析的37个肿瘤中,36.8%的胃癌和44.4%的结直肠癌为MSI高。在7例患者中鉴定出种系致病性MMR变异。尽管存在共同的高突变表型,但配对肿瘤之间重叠体细胞突变的比例始终较低(<5%)。突变特征因MSI状态而异,包括SBS1/5(衰老)和SBS15(MMR缺陷)。值得注意的是,一名非林奇综合征患者的两个肿瘤均表现出MYC扩增,经荧光原位杂交证实。

结论

即使在具有共同种系易感性的患者中,不同器官出现的原发性肿瘤也表现出显著的基因组差异。这些发现表明器官特异性选择压力驱动独立的肿瘤进化,强调在多原发性癌症病例中进行个体化分子分析和治疗靶向的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e12/12415424/92bf1f0c32f0/kjco-25359f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e12/12415424/793f07a044e1/kjco-25359f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e12/12415424/84869235ab5c/kjco-25359f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e12/12415424/92bf1f0c32f0/kjco-25359f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e12/12415424/793f07a044e1/kjco-25359f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e12/12415424/84869235ab5c/kjco-25359f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e12/12415424/92bf1f0c32f0/kjco-25359f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Intrapatient genomic divergence across multiple primary tumors in young Korean patients.韩国年轻患者多个原发性肿瘤之间的患者内基因组差异。
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2025 Aug;21(2):90-97. doi: 10.14216/kjco.25359. Epub 2025 Aug 31.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Immune landscape and TAM density in endometrial cancer: implications for immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy.子宫内膜癌中的免疫格局与肿瘤相关巨噬细胞密度:对免疫检查点抑制剂疗效的影响
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2025 Aug 8;17:17588359251347364. doi: 10.1177/17588359251347364. eCollection 2025.
4
From gaps to compliance: a 12-year retrospective cohort study of trends in mismatch repair protein testing and Lynch syndrome identification in colorectal cancer in Central Switzerland.从差距到合规:瑞士中部地区结直肠癌错配修复蛋白检测及林奇综合征识别趋势的12年回顾性队列研究
Swiss Med Wkly. 2025 Jul 14;155:4345. doi: 10.57187/s.4345.
5
Characterization of mismatch-repair/microsatellite instability-discordant endometrial cancers.错配修复/微卫星不稳定不一致型子宫内膜癌的特征。
Cancer. 2024 Feb 1;130(3):385-399. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35030. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
6
Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.液体活检能否通过低深度全基因组测序检测肉瘤患者的循环肿瘤DNA?一项初步评估。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003161. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
7
Second malignancies in patients with deficient mismatch repair system/microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer.错配修复缺陷系统/微卫星高度不稳定型结直肠癌患者的第二原发性恶性肿瘤
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 21;18:17562848251347375. doi: 10.1177/17562848251347375. eCollection 2025.
8
Uveal Melanoma and the Lynch Syndrome Tumor Spectrum.葡萄膜黑色素瘤与林奇综合征肿瘤谱
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.1779.
9
Hereditary Micro‑Satellite Instable cancers associated with Lynch Syndrome: predictive biomarkers and novel immuno-therapeutic approaches.与林奇综合征相关的遗传性微卫星不稳定癌症:预测性生物标志物和新型免疫治疗方法。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2025 Sep;62(6):477-490. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2025.2504915. Epub 2025 Jun 1.
10
Lynch Syndrome and Somatic Mismatch Repair Variants in Pancreas Cancer.林奇综合征与胰腺癌中体细胞错配修复变异。
JAMA Oncol. 2024 Nov 1;10(11):1511-1518. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.3651.

本文引用的文献

1
Emerging role of bile acids in colorectal liver metastasis: From molecular mechanism to clinical significance (Review).胆汁酸在结直肠癌肝转移中的新作用:从分子机制到临床意义(综述)
Int J Oncol. 2025 Mar;66(3). doi: 10.3892/ijo.2025.5730. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
2
Helicobacter pylori and gastric cancer: mechanisms and new perspectives.幽门螺杆菌与胃癌:机制及新观点
J Hematol Oncol. 2025 Jan 23;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01654-2.
3
Spatial and Temporal Tumor Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer: Discordance of Predictive Biomarkers.
胃癌的时空肿瘤异质性:预测生物标志物的不一致性
J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jan;25(1):192-209. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e3.
4
Risk of Subsequent Primary Cancers Among Adult-Onset 5-Year Cancer Survivors in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.韩国成年癌症 5 年幸存者继发原发性癌症的风险:回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 May 8;10:e48380. doi: 10.2196/48380.
5
Deciphering metastatic route-specific signals and their microenvironment interactions in peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer.解析胃癌腹膜转移中转移途径特异性信号及其与微环境的相互作用。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2024 Apr;44(4):514-517. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12533. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
6
Risk Factors of Gastric Cancer and Lifestyle Modification for Prevention.胃癌的危险因素及预防的生活方式改变
J Gastric Cancer. 2024 Jan;24(1):99-107. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2024.24.e10.
7
Genomic and evolutionary characteristics of metastatic gastric cancer by routes.通过途径分析转移性胃癌的基因组和进化特征。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Sep;129(4):672-682. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02338-3. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
8
Comprehensive Study of Microsatellite Instability Testing and Its Comparison With Immunohistochemistry in Gastric Cancers.胃癌微卫星不稳定性检测的综合研究及其与免疫组织化学的比较
J Gastric Cancer. 2023 Apr;23(2):264-274. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e5.
9
Uncovering novel mutational signatures by extraction with SigProfilerExtractor.通过SigProfilerExtractor提取来揭示新的突变特征。
Cell Genom. 2022 Nov 9;2(11):None. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100179.
10
Increased somatic mutation burdens in normal human cells due to defective DNA polymerases.由于 DNA 聚合酶缺陷导致正常人类细胞中的体细胞突变负担增加。
Nat Genet. 2021 Oct;53(10):1434-1442. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00930-y. Epub 2021 Sep 30.