• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种引发替代性诊断假设的反思性言语化策略。

A Reflective Verbalization Strategy to Trigger Alternative Diagnostic Hypotheses.

作者信息

Isoda Sho, Shimizu Taro, Hashimoto Tadayuki, Shimada Fumio, Misawa Miwa, Suzuki Tomio

机构信息

Department of General Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.

Psychology Division, Graduate School of Human Science, Ritsumeikan University, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Sep;31(6):e70267. doi: 10.1111/jep.70267.

DOI:10.1111/jep.70267
PMID:40916928
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12415801/
Abstract

RATIONALE

Physicians sometimes encounter various types of gut feelings (GFs) during clinical diagnosis. The type of GF addressed in this paper refers to the intuitive sense that the generated hypothesis might be incorrect. An appropriate diagnosis cannot be obtained unless these GFs are articulated and inventive solutions are devised. Thus, the method of articulating GFs is critical.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The current study proposes reflective verbalization (RV) to help healthcare professionals capitalize on their GF. In cognitive psychology, RV is the process of verbalizing one's thoughts and feelings through metacognition, to promote deeper understanding and insight problem-solving. When applied to clinical reasoning, RV can help doctors verbalize their GFs, refining their diagnostic hypotheses.

METHOD

To address GFs systematically using RV, we introduce the DATES approach, comprising five perspectives: Degree, Abandoned, Time course, Excess, and Shortage. Each perspective prompts physicians to compare their patient's information against typical illness scripts, ensuring no detail is omitted or overlooked.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The tool also aids physicians in considering possible differential diagnoses for one or more of these elements. This guiding tool may aid physicians in overcoming biases, including confirmation and anchoring biases, thus improving diagnostic accuracy. This tool is useful for healthcare professionals who wish to improve their clinical reasoning and decision-making abilities, particularly when they encounter inexplicable contradictions in their diagnostic hypotheses.

摘要

理论依据

医生在临床诊断过程中有时会遇到各种类型的直觉感受(GFs)。本文所讨论的GF类型是指那种认为所产生的假设可能不正确的直觉。除非这些直觉感受能够被清晰表达并想出创造性的解决方案,否则无法获得恰当的诊断。因此,清晰表达直觉感受的方法至关重要。

目的

本研究提出反思性言语表达(RV),以帮助医疗保健专业人员利用他们的直觉感受。在认知心理学中,RV是通过元认知将个人的想法和感受用言语表达出来的过程,以促进对问题解决的更深入理解和洞察。当应用于临床推理时,RV可以帮助医生用言语表达他们的直觉感受,完善他们的诊断假设。

方法

为了使用RV系统地处理直觉感受,我们引入了DATES方法,它包含五个视角:程度、放弃、时间进程、过度和不足。每个视角促使医生将患者的信息与典型的疾病脚本进行比较,确保没有细节被遗漏或忽视。

结果与结论

该工具还帮助医生考虑这些因素中一个或多个因素的可能鉴别诊断。这个指导工具可能有助于医生克服偏见,包括确认性偏见和锚定偏见,从而提高诊断准确性。这个工具对于希望提高临床推理和决策能力的医疗保健专业人员很有用,特别是当他们在诊断假设中遇到无法解释的矛盾时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba3/12415801/227fbbd7a54d/JEP-31-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba3/12415801/227fbbd7a54d/JEP-31-0-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bba3/12415801/227fbbd7a54d/JEP-31-0-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Reflective Verbalization Strategy to Trigger Alternative Diagnostic Hypotheses.一种引发替代性诊断假设的反思性言语化策略。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Sep;31(6):e70267. doi: 10.1111/jep.70267.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
5
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
7
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Borderline Personality as a Factor in Late, Missed, and Mis-Diagnosis in Autistic Girls and Women: A Conceptual Analysis.边缘型人格障碍作为自闭症女孩和女性晚期诊断延误、漏诊及误诊的一个因素:概念分析
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):401-427. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0034. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
10
Patient Restraint and Seclusion患者约束与隔离

本文引用的文献

1
The role of team dynamics and team acquaintance in group metacognition during medical students' collaborative learning.团队动态和团队熟悉程度在医学生协作学习过程中的群体元认知中的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07522-y.
2
Creativity and diagnostic reasoning.
Diagnosis (Berl). 2025 May 6. doi: 10.1515/dx-2025-0015.
3
Physicians' prism: illuminating history with structured expertise.医生的视角:用结构化的专业知识照亮历史。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1515/dx-2025-0003.
4
FRAMED: a framework facilitating insight problem solving.FRAMED:一个促进洞察问题解决的框架。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Feb 23;11(3):240-243. doi: 10.1515/dx-2023-0152. eCollection 2024 Aug 1.
5
Deliberate reflection and clinical reasoning: Founding ideas and empirical findings.深思熟虑的反思和临床推理:基本理念和经验发现。
Med Educ. 2023 Jan;57(1):76-85. doi: 10.1111/medu.14863. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
6
How insight contributes to diagnostic excellence.洞见如何促进诊断卓越。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2022 Jun 8;9(3):311-315. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0007. eCollection 2022 Aug 1.
7
Learning Illness Scripts Through Drawing.通过绘图学习疾病脚本。
J Nurs Educ. 2022 Oct;61(10):603. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20220417-03. Epub 2022 May 10.
8
Advancing diagnostic excellence: the cognitive challenge for medicine.推进卓越诊断:医学面临的认知挑战。
BMJ. 2022 Mar 29;376:o799. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o799.
9
Prospective Observational Study on the Prevalence and Diagnostic Value of General Practitioners' Gut Feelings for Cancer and Serious Diseases.前瞻性观察研究:全科医生对癌症和严重疾病的直觉的流行程度和诊断价值。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov;37(15):3823-3831. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07352-w. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
10
The Reply.
Am J Med. 2020 Jun;133(6):e328. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Apr 14.