Khayamzadeh Mina, Razmara Farnoosh, Tavassoli Afagh
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, International Campus, Tehran, Iran.
Craniomaxillofacial Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Oct;11(5):e70214. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70214.
Among the minimally invasive techniques for treating temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) is dry needling, which can be used as a potential treatment method. This study aims to review current knowledge to understand the impact of dry needling on treating TMDs.
This systematic review was carried out in alignment with the guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The search was done on the studies published between 2000 and 2024. Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was applied to evaluate the risk of bias.
A total of 673 studies were identified. Among these, 245 articles were assessed for eligibility; ultimately, 10 studies were made up of the final review. These studies evaluated several outcome measures, the most common of which were: the visual analog scale (VAS), verbal rating scale (VRS), electromyography (EMG), extent of mouth opening, pain symptomatology, myofascial trigger point pain, sonographic measurements, bilateral muscle palpation with a pressure algometer, Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), and mandibular mobility. Most RCTs had a low risk of bias.
The findings consistently underscore the role of dry needling (DN) and other adjunctive therapies in improving clinical outcomes, particularly pain reduction and functional improvement.
在治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMDs)的微创技术中,干针疗法是一种可作为潜在治疗方法的技术。本研究旨在回顾现有知识,以了解干针疗法对治疗TMDs的影响。
本系统评价按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)中概述的指南进行。使用PubMed、Scopus和谷歌学术进行了全面的文献检索。检索的是2000年至2024年发表的研究。应用Cochrane协作网的随机对照试验(RCT)偏倚风险工具来评估偏倚风险。
共识别出673项研究。其中,对245篇文章进行了资格评估;最终,10项研究构成了最终综述。这些研究评估了多种结局指标,最常见的有:视觉模拟量表(VAS)、言语评定量表(VRS)、肌电图(EMG)、开口程度、疼痛症状、肌筋膜触发点疼痛、超声测量、用压力痛觉计进行双侧肌肉触诊、耳鸣障碍量表(THI)和下颌运动度。大多数随机对照试验的偏倚风险较低。
研究结果一致强调干针疗法(DN)和其他辅助疗法在改善临床结局,特别是减轻疼痛和改善功能方面的作用。