Satterfield Brieann C, Finlay Myles G, Fluke Sofia K, Skeiky Lillian, Schmidt Michelle A, Wisor Jonathan P, Van Dongen Hans P A
Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States.
Department of Translational Medicine and Physiology, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, United States.
Sleep Adv. 2025 Jun 23;6(3):zpaf041. doi: 10.1093/sleepadvances/zpaf041. eCollection 2025.
There are large individual differences in the homeostatic response to sleep deprivation, as reflected in slow wave sleep (SWS) and electroencephalogram (EEG) spectral power, which have largely been left unexplained. Recent evidence suggests the possible involvement of the activity-regulated cytoskeleton-associated protein () gene. Here we assessed the effects of the "c.*742 + 58C > T non-coding single nucleotide polymorphism" of the human gene (rs35900184) on sleep-physiological and waking-neurobehavioral responses to total sleep deprivation (TSD).
= 50 healthy, young adults participated in a 4-day/3-night in-laboratory study with a 38-h TSD period, flanked by 10-h baseline and recovery sleep opportunities. Sleep was recorded polysomnographically and the EEG of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep was subjected to spectral analysis. Waking neurobehavioral functioning was measured with the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) and the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS).
C/C homozygotes, compared to T allele carriers, showed a greater SWS rebound during recovery sleep after TSD relative to baseline. T/T homozygotes showed increased EEG spectral power in the NREM theta and alpha bands and in the REM delta, theta, alpha, and beta bands, but there was no significant genotype difference in the NREM delta power response to TSD. There were also no significant genotype differences in the impact of TSD on PVT performance and KSS sleepiness.
Individual differences in the sleep physiological rebound after TSD were influenced by genotype. However, our findings were only partially consistent with mediating the sleep homeostatic response to sleep deprivation. .
睡眠剥夺的稳态反应存在很大的个体差异,这在慢波睡眠(SWS)和脑电图(EEG)频谱功率中有所体现,但很大程度上尚未得到解释。最近的证据表明,活性调节细胞骨架相关蛋白()基因可能参与其中。在此,我们评估了人类基因(rs35900184)的“c.*742 + 58C > T非编码单核苷酸多态性”对完全睡眠剥夺(TSD)的睡眠生理和清醒神经行为反应的影响。
50名健康的年轻成年人参与了一项为期4天/3晚的实验室研究,其中有38小时的TSD期,前后分别有10小时的基线睡眠和恢复睡眠机会。通过多导睡眠图记录睡眠情况,并对非快速眼动(NREM)和快速眼动(REM)睡眠的脑电图进行频谱分析。用精神运动警觉性测试(PVT)和卡罗林斯卡嗜睡量表(KSS)测量清醒时的神经行为功能。
与T等位基因携带者相比,C/C纯合子在TSD后的恢复睡眠期间相对于基线表现出更大的SWS反弹。T/T纯合子在NREM θ和α频段以及REM δ、θ、α和β频段的脑电图频谱功率增加,但在NREM δ功率对TSD的反应中没有显著的基因型差异。TSD对PVT表现和KSS嗜睡的影响也没有显著的基因型差异。
TSD后睡眠生理反弹的个体差异受基因基因型的影响。然而,我们的研究结果仅部分支持基因介导对睡眠剥夺的睡眠稳态反应这一观点。