Zendt Mackenzie, Bustos Carrillo Fausto Andres, Callier Viviane, DeGrange Maureen, Ginigeme Anita, Wu Lurline, Manuelpillai Bevin, Ortega-Villa Ana, Ricotta Emily E
Epidemiology and Data Management Unit, Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Division of Intramural Research, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Clinical Monitoring Research Program Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Aug 31;3(2):e002436. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-002436. eCollection 2025.
Immune-deficient/disordered people (IDP) elicit a less robust immune response to COVID-19 vaccination than the general US population. Despite millions of IDP at presumed elevated risk, few population-level studies of IDP have been conducted in the Omicron era to evaluate breakthrough infection-related outcomes.
We followed a prospective cohort of 219 IDP and 63 healthy volunteers (HV) in the USA from April 2021 (Alpha variant peak) to July 2023 (Omicron XBB variant peak). IDP had a primary or secondary immune disorder. All participants were≥3 years old and received COVID-19 vaccines external to this study. We quantified anti-spike IgG titre levels by ELISA, measured breakthroughs via participant reports and laboratory tests on saliva samples, compared breakthrough incidence among HV and IDP, assessed infection complications (persistent infections, reinfections and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC)) and used surveys to capture COVID-19 symptoms and preventive attitudes/behaviours.
Among IDP, the incidence of initial breakthrough infection was 8.8 (95% CI 4.5 to 62.5) times higher during than before the Omicron era. There were 88 initial breakthrough infections among IDP (incidence rate 23.7/100 person-years) and 28 among HV (27.3/100) throughout the study period. While COVID-19 symptoms were generally mild, five participants, all IDP, were hospitalised. In traditional analyses and an emulated trial, the quantity of anti-spike IgG 1 month after participants' most recent pre-infection vaccination was not associated with breakthrough. HV and IDP frequently practiced infection-limiting behaviours, but IDP were more likely to continue such behaviours after vaccination. IDP experienced persistent infections, PASC and reinfections more commonly than HV.
Breakthrough rates in IDP were largely equivalent to HV. However, IDP experienced a slightly higher frequency of symptoms, hospitalisations, infection persistence, PASC and reinfections than HV. Further study is needed to elucidate the immunological mechanisms that increase the risks of such complications in IDP.
免疫缺陷/紊乱人群(IDP)对新冠病毒疫苗接种产生的免疫反应不如美国普通人群强烈。尽管数百万IDP被认为风险较高,但在奥密克戎时代,针对IDP的人群层面研究很少,以评估与突破性感染相关的结果。
我们在美国对219名IDP和63名健康志愿者(HV)进行了前瞻性队列研究,时间从2021年4月(阿尔法变异株高峰期)至2023年7月(奥密克戎XBB变异株高峰期)。IDP患有原发性或继发性免疫疾病。所有参与者年龄≥3岁,且在本研究之外接种了新冠病毒疫苗。我们通过酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)对抗刺突蛋白IgG滴度水平进行定量,通过参与者报告和对唾液样本的实验室检测来测量突破性感染,比较HV和IDP中的突破性感染发生率,评估感染并发症(持续性感染、再次感染和新冠病毒急性后遗症(PASC)),并通过调查了解新冠病毒症状以及预防态度/行为。
在IDP中,奥密克戎时代期间初始突破性感染的发生率比该时代之前高8.8(95%置信区间4.5至62.5)倍。在整个研究期间,IDP中有88例初始突破性感染(发病率23.7/100人年),HV中有28例(27.3/100)。虽然新冠病毒症状通常较轻,但有5名参与者(均为IDP)住院治疗。在传统分析和模拟试验中,参与者最近一次感染前接种疫苗1个月后的抗刺突蛋白IgG量与突破性感染无关。HV和IDP经常采取限制感染的行为,但IDP在接种疫苗后更有可能继续此类行为。IDP比HV更常经历持续性感染、PASC和再次感染。
IDP中的突破性感染率在很大程度上与HV相当。然而,IDP出现症状、住院、感染持续、PASC和再次感染的频率略高于HV。需要进一步研究以阐明增加IDP出现此类并发症风险的免疫机制。