Suppr超能文献

经腰大肌外侧、前路及椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术术后急性疼痛与阿片类药物使用的比较分析

Comparative analysis of acute postoperative pain and opioid use between lateral transpsoas, anterior, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions.

作者信息

Ayhan Ekrem M, Giannasca Thomas, Laverdiere Jake, Sanzari Laura, Panek Gina, Yannopoulos Aris

机构信息

Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, North Haven, CT, United States.

Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute, Hartford, CT, United States.

出版信息

N Am Spine Soc J. 2025 Aug 8;23:100781. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2025.100781. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion is associated with transient postoperative anterior thigh and inguinal dysesthesias and hip flexor weakness from manipulation of the psoas and interposed lumbar plexus. However, it remains unclear whether this translates to higher pain scores and opioid requirements.

METHODS

Patients who had undergone one- or two-level extreme/direct (XLIF/DLIF), anterior (ALIF), or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) between January 2018 and December 2023 for degenerative spinal pathology were included. All cases were further classified as standalone or pedicle screw-fixated, and pedicle screw-fixated was included as a covariate. Outcomes were assessed using multivariable linear or binary logistic regression and included length of stay (LOS), inpatient daily maximum pain scores, inpatient morphine-equivalent daily dosage, and total inpatient morphine milligram equivalents, 30- and 90-day complications, emergency department visits, return to operating room, and readmission, and 90-day and 1-year Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and EuroQuol-5 Dimension (EQ5D).

RESULTS

A total of 936 patients were assessed, including 90 (9.6%) XLIF/DLIFs, 587 (62.7%) TLIFs, and 259 (27.6%) ALIFs. Pedicle screw fixation differed significantly between approaches (TLIF: 100%, ALIF: 51.0%, XLIF/DLIF: 51.1%; p<.001). The XLIF/DLIF approach had the shortest operative time compared to ALIF and TLIF (p<.003). Furthermore, XLIF/DLIF approach was associated with lower 90-day ODI than TLIF (=-21.185; p=.002) and ALIF (=-9.275; p=.043), higher 90-day EQ5D than TLIF (=+27.389; p<.001) and ALIF (=+13.897; p=.001), higher morphine-equivalent daily dosage than TLIF (=+29.115; p<.001) and ALIF (=+11.959; p=.006), and shorter LOS than TLIF (=-45.500 hours; p=.014) and ALIF (=-24.447 hours; p=.049). No significant differences were observed in maximum pain scores, total inpatient morphine milligram equivalents, complications, readmissions, or return to operating room.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a shorter operative time, shorter LOS, and better 90-day ODI and EQ5D, the lateral transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion is associated with higher postoperative inpatient opioid consumption than TLIF and ALIF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

经腰大肌外侧腰椎椎间融合术与术后短暂的大腿前侧和腹股沟感觉异常以及因腰大肌和腰丛神经受操作影响而导致的髋屈肌无力有关。然而,目前尚不清楚这是否会转化为更高的疼痛评分和阿片类药物需求量。

方法

纳入2018年1月至2023年12月期间因退行性脊柱病变接受单节段或双节段极外侧/直接(XLIF/DLIF)、前路(ALIF)或经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)的患者。所有病例进一步分为单纯手术或椎弓根螺钉固定,椎弓根螺钉固定作为协变量纳入。使用多变量线性或二元逻辑回归评估结果,包括住院时间(LOS)、住院期间每日最大疼痛评分、住院期间吗啡等效每日剂量和住院期间吗啡总毫克当量、30天和90天并发症、急诊就诊、返回手术室和再次入院,以及90天和1年的奥斯威斯功能障碍指数(ODI)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ5D)。

结果

共评估了936例患者,包括90例(9.6%)XLIF/DLIF、587例(62.7%)TLIF和259例(27.6%)ALIF。不同手术方式的椎弓根螺钉固定情况差异显著(TLIF:100%,ALIF:51.0%,XLIF/DLIF:51.1%;p<0.001)。与ALIF和TLIF相比,XLIF/DLIF手术方式的手术时间最短(p<0.003)。此外,XLIF/DLIF手术方式与90天ODI低于TLIF(=-21.185;p=0.002)和ALIF(=-9.275;p=0.043)、90天EQ5D高于TLIF(=+27.389;p<0.001)和ALIF(=+13.897;p=0.001)、吗啡等效每日剂量高于TLIF(=+29.115;p<0.001)和ALIF(=+11.959;p=0.006)以及住院时间短于TLIF(=-45.500小时;p=0.014)和ALIF(=-24.447小时;p=0.049)相关。在最大疼痛评分、住院期间吗啡总毫克当量、并发症、再次入院或返回手术室方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

尽管经腰大肌外侧腰椎椎间融合术手术时间较短、住院时间较短且90天ODI和EQ5D较好,但与TLIF和ALIF相比,其术后住院期间阿片类药物消耗量更高。

证据级别

III级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fa17/12409976/b7aa7519b8aa/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验