Suppr超能文献

跨专业照护团队视角下的姑息治疗研究:一项横断面调查的见解

Conducting Research in Palliative Care as Viewed by Interprofessional Care Teams: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Survey.

作者信息

Roux Coralie, Pautex Sophie, Bianchi Federica, Hentsch Lisa

机构信息

Medical Faculty, Geneva University, Geneva, Switzerland.

Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Palliat Med Rep. 2025 Jun 25;6(1):374-381. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0099. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Conducting studies in palliative care can be challenging. It has been highlighted that the interprofessional team may have their own reasons for not engaging in research projects. We aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to the involvement of palliative care team members in research projects.

METHOD

We used a cross-sectional online survey with qualitative and quantitative components to identify barriers and facilitators encountered by palliative care health professionals. Participants were physicians, nurses, nurse assistants, physiotherapists, dieticians, and occupational therapists working in the Division of Palliative Medicine of the Geneva University Hospitals in Switzerland. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis for the open-ended questions.

RESULTS

A total of 107 questionnaires were sent, and 51 participants (48%) provided responses, of whom 75% expressed an interest in research, although only 47% had previously taken part in a research project. The most cited barriers were a lack of training on how to conduct studies, a lack of time, and a lack of funding. The main facilitators were the recognition that research enhances the quality of care and the belief that patients should be respected in their autonomy and given the opportunity to participate in research projects.

CONCLUSION

The interprofessional palliative care team would benefit from time, funds, and training in order to enhance a research culture within the team. The establishment of an interprofessional network to guide and share experiences would also be a good way to promote this culture.

摘要

引言

开展姑息治疗研究具有挑战性。有观点强调,跨专业团队可能有其不参与研究项目的自身原因。我们旨在确定姑息治疗团队成员参与研究项目的障碍和促进因素。

方法

我们采用了一项包含定性和定量部分的横断面在线调查,以确定姑息治疗卫生专业人员遇到的障碍和促进因素。参与者为在瑞士日内瓦大学医院姑息医学科工作的医生、护士、护士助理、物理治疗师、营养师和职业治疗师。对开放式问题的数据采用描述性统计和内容分析进行分析。

结果

共发放107份问卷,51名参与者(48%)提供了回复,其中75%表示对研究感兴趣,尽管只有47%曾参与过研究项目。最常被提及的障碍是缺乏研究方法培训、时间不足和资金缺乏。主要促进因素是认识到研究可提高护理质量,以及相信应尊重患者的自主权并给予其参与研究项目的机会。

结论

跨专业姑息治疗团队将受益于时间、资金和培训,以增强团队内部的研究氛围。建立一个跨专业网络来指导和分享经验也是促进这种氛围的好方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Primary palliative care research: opportunities and challenges.初级姑息治疗研究:机遇与挑战。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Dec;9(4):468-472. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001653. Epub 2019 Feb 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验