Wynn Adriane, Harris Devon, Modest Anna, Reyes Maria de Fatima, Wamakima Bridgette, Gaborone Kelebogile, Moraka Natasha, Gompers Annika, Moyo Sikhulile, Shapiro Roger, Ramogola-Masire Doreen, Luckett Rebecca
Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Botswana Harvard Health Partnership, Gaborone, Botswana.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 8;20(9):e0328803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328803. eCollection 2025.
Cervical cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death among women in sub-Saharan Africa and is more severe in high HIV-burdened countries due to persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV). In 2021, the World Health Organization recommended primary hrHPV testing for cervical cancer screening; however, optimal triage strategies following positive hrHPV tests remain unclear. We conducted a prospective cost analysis of triage methods for positive hrHPV results among women living with and without HIV in Gaborone, Botswana. We used a micro-costing approach from the perspective of the healthcare provider. The main outcomes were the implementation costs associated with three triage strategies following hrHPV testing: 8-type HPV genotype restriction, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), and colposcopy. We also compared the strategies by measuring the change in costs divided by the change in number of true cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or worse (CIN2+) identified, based on the results of a prospective cohort study. Results indicated that the 8-type HPV genotype restriction strategy was the most cost-efficient, requiring no additional costs beyond hrHPV testing and identifying the highest number of true CIN2 + cases. VIA and colposcopy triage identified fewer true cases of CIN2+ and incurred additional costs, with colposcopy being the most expensive. Results were consistent in women with and without HIV. Sensitivity analysis highlighted personnel and hrHPV test kit cartridge costs as significant drivers of overall costs. Post-hoc analysis incorporating average treatment costs for precancer demonstrated that genotyping remained dominant at lower treatment costs but became less favorable as treatment costs increased. We found that 8-type genotype restriction was optimal compared to hrHPV screening combined with VIA or colposcopy. Cost estimates can inform future studies that examine the long-term costs and health outcomes of HPV-based two-stage screening algorithms.
宫颈癌仍是撒哈拉以南非洲地区女性癌症死亡的主要原因,在艾滋病毒负担较重的国家,由于持续性高危型人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)感染,情况更为严重。2021年,世界卫生组织建议将hrHPV初筛用于宫颈癌筛查;然而,hrHPV检测呈阳性后的最佳分流策略仍不明确。我们对博茨瓦纳哈博罗内感染和未感染艾滋病毒的女性hrHPV检测结果阳性的分流方法进行了前瞻性成本分析。我们从医疗服务提供者的角度采用了微观成本核算方法。主要结果是hrHPV检测后三种分流策略的实施成本:8型HPV基因分型限制、醋酸白试验(VIA)和阴道镜检查。我们还根据一项前瞻性队列研究的结果,通过测量成本变化除以确诊的宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)2级或更严重病变(CIN2+)真实病例数的变化来比较这些策略。结果表明,8型HPV基因分型限制策略最具成本效益,除hrHPV检测外无需额外成本,且能识别出最多的CIN2+真实病例。VIA和阴道镜检查分流识别出的CIN2+真实病例较少,且产生了额外成本,其中阴道镜检查成本最高。感染和未感染艾滋病毒的女性结果一致。敏感性分析强调人员和hrHPV检测试剂盒成本是总成本的重要驱动因素。纳入癌前病变平均治疗成本的事后分析表明,基因分型在较低治疗成本时仍占主导地位,但随着治疗成本增加,优势逐渐减弱。我们发现,与hrHPV筛查联合VIA或阴道镜检查相比,8型基因分型限制是最佳选择。成本估计可为未来研究提供参考,这些研究将考察基于HPV的两阶段筛查算法的长期成本和健康结果。