• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公众对数字化与患者安全的认知:德国的一项横断面调查。

Public perceptions of digitalisation and patient safety: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.

作者信息

Amberger Olga Anastasia, Lemke Dorothea, Müller Hardy, Lüttel Dagmar, Schwappach David, Geraedts Max, Müller Beate S

机构信息

Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt on the Main, Germany

Gesundheitsamt Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e100516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100516.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100516
PMID:40921645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12421183/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To explore perceptions of digitalisation and patient safety from the view of the German general public and related sociodemographic factors.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

A nationwide survey was undertaken in 2024, using data from the Techniker Krankenkasse (TK) Monitor of Patient Safety. The TK Monitor of Patient Safety is an annual survey of the population on the state of patient safety in medical care.

PARTICIPANTS

1000 German adults (18 years and older).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Ordinal logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations among sociodemographic factors (age, gender, education and household income) and perceptions on digitalisation and patient safety.

RESULTS

The majority of respondents expected benefits from digital applications in healthcare. Over half of the respondents (58%) believed that artificial intelligence (AI) can help reduce complications and errors, while 49% of the respondents believed that the use of AI poses serious new risks for the healthcare sector. The results showed that sociodemographic variables are important factors influencing patient safety perceptions of digitalisation and AI. Female, older, less educated and/or lower-income individuals were less likely to perceive benefits from digital care applications and AI.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the German public appears to view digital technologies and AI as tools both for improving patient safety and as potential risk factors. Our findings also highlight the importance of analysing sociodemographic factors to identify specific disparities in how different groups are affected by digitalisation. Such analysis is essential for developing targeted strategies that mitigate current patient safety risks, ensuring that digital health solutions are equitable and safe across all demographic groups.

摘要

目的

从德国普通公众的视角以及相关社会人口学因素出发,探讨对数字化与患者安全的认知。

设计

横断面调查。

背景

2024年开展了一项全国性调查,使用来自技术人员医疗保险公司(TK)患者安全监测的数据。TK患者安全监测是一项针对医疗保健中患者安全状况的年度人口调查。

参与者

1000名德国成年人(18岁及以上)。

主要和次要结局指标

进行有序逻辑回归分析,以研究社会人口学因素(年龄、性别、教育程度和家庭收入)与对数字化和患者安全的认知之间的关联。

结果

大多数受访者期望医疗保健中的数字应用能带来益处。超过一半的受访者(58%)认为人工智能(AI)有助于减少并发症和错误,而49%的受访者认为使用AI给医疗保健行业带来了严重的新风险。结果表明,社会人口学变量是影响对数字化和AI的患者安全认知的重要因素。女性、年龄较大、受教育程度较低和/或收入较低的个体不太可能从数字护理应用和AI中感知到益处。

结论

在我们的研究中,德国公众似乎将数字技术和AI视为既有助于提高患者安全又作为潜在风险因素的工具。我们的研究结果还强调了分析社会人口学因素以识别不同群体受数字化影响方式的具体差异的重要性。这种分析对于制定减轻当前患者安全风险的针对性策略至关重要,确保数字健康解决方案在所有人口群体中都是公平且安全的。

相似文献

1
Public perceptions of digitalisation and patient safety: a cross-sectional survey in Germany.公众对数字化与患者安全的认知:德国的一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e100516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100516.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Trends in public perceptions of patient safety during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a repeated cross-sectional survey in Germany, 2019-2023.2019 - 2023年德国重复横断面调查结果:新冠疫情期间公众对患者安全认知的趋势
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 5;20(8):e0329761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329761. eCollection 2025.
4
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
5
Public perceptions of artificial intelligence in healthcare: ethical concerns and opportunities for patient-centered care.公众对医疗保健领域人工智能的看法:关注伦理问题,以实现以患者为中心的护理。
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Jun 22;25(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01066-4.
6
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
7
Remote and digital services in UK general practice 2021-2023: the Remote by Default 2 longitudinal qualitative study synopsis.2021 - 2023年英国全科医疗中的远程和数字服务:“默认远程”2纵向定性研究概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(31):1-49. doi: 10.3310/QQTT4411.
8
Sociodemographics and Digital Health Literacy in Using Wearables for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention: Cross-Sectional Nationwide Survey in Germany.德国全国性横断面调查:社会人口统计学与使用可穿戴设备促进健康和预防疾病方面的数字健康素养
J Prev (2022). 2024 Dec 18. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00821-y.
9
Attitudes and readiness to adopt artificial intelligence among healthcare practitioners in Pakistan's resource-limited settings.巴基斯坦资源有限环境下医疗从业者对采用人工智能的态度及准备情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 6;25(1):1031. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13207-5.
10
Attitudes, Perceptions, and Factors Influencing the Adoption of AI in Health Care Among Medical Staff: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey Study.医务人员对医疗保健领域采用人工智能的态度、认知及影响因素:全国横断面调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 8;27:e75343. doi: 10.2196/75343.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological safety and patient safety: A systematic and narrative review.心理安全与患者安全:一项系统综述与叙述性综述
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 24;20(4):e0322215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322215. eCollection 2025.
2
Patient safety and climate change: findings from a cross-sectional survey in Germany.患者安全与气候变化:德国横断面调查研究结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;24(1):3233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20752-x.
3
Emotional and Psychological Safety in Healthcare Digitalization: A Design Ethnographic Study.医疗数字化中的情感和心理安全:一项设计民族志研究。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Sep 6;69:1607575. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607575. eCollection 2024.
4
Emotional and psychological safety in the context of digital transformation in healthcare: a mixed-method strategic foresight study.医疗数字化转型背景下的情感和心理安全:混合方法战略前瞻研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Sep 20;31(1):e101048. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101048.
5
The Paradoxes of Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study.医院数字工具的悖论:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 15;26:e56095. doi: 10.2196/56095.
6
Nurses' perceptions, experience and knowledge regarding artificial intelligence: results from a cross-sectional online survey in Germany.护士对人工智能的认知、经验和知识:德国一项横断面在线调查的结果。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Mar 27;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01884-2.
7
Feeling safe in the context of digitalization in healthcare: a scoping review.数字化医疗背景下的安全感:综述研究。
Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 8;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02465-9.
8
ChatGPT in healthcare: A taxonomy and systematic review.ChatGPT 在医疗保健中的应用:分类法与系统综述。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Mar;245:108013. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108013. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
9
Improving health literacy using the power of digital communications to achieve better health outcomes for patients and practitioners.利用数字通信的力量提高健康素养,为患者和从业者带来更好的健康结果。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Nov 17;5:1264780. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1264780. eCollection 2023.
10
The effects of digitalisation on health and social care work: a qualitative descriptive study of the perceptions of professionals and managers.数字化对医疗保健工作的影响:对专业人员和管理人员看法的定性描述研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):714. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09730-y.