Pan Chen-Chia, De Santis Karina Karolina, Muellmann Saskia, Hoffmann Stephanie, Spallek Jacob, Barnils Nuria Pedros, Ahrens Wolfgang, Zeeb Hajo, Schüz Benjamin
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Leibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.
J Prev (2022). 2024 Dec 18. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00821-y.
Wearable technologies have the potential to support health promotion and disease prevention. However, it remains unclear how the role of social determinants of health (SDoH) and digital determinants of health (DDoH) plays in this context.
This study investigates differences in sociodemographic factors and digital health literacy between wearable users and non-users, whether the association with wearable use varies across age groups and its potential mediator.
A cross-sectional nationwide telephone survey was conducted in November 2022 in a panel of adult internet users in Germany. Assessments included self-reported wearable use, sociodemographic factors (sex, age, education, household size and income, and residence region), and digital health literacy (measured with the eHealth Literacy Scale, eHEALS). Associations between wearable use, sociodemographic factors and digital health literacy were analyzed using binomial logistic regression models in the total sample and with age group stratification, with a supplementary mediation analysis examining digital health literacy as a mediator in the relationship between age and wearable use.
Overall, 24% (223/932) of participants (52% male, mean age 55.6 years) reported using wearables for health. Wearable use was lower among participants aged 65 and above, with lower educational attainment, living in 1-2 person households, with below-average household income, and residing in smaller cities or former East Germany. Wearable use prevalence is substantially lower in older age groups (18-40: 36%; 41-64: 26%; 65+:14%). Wearable users reported higher levels of digital health literacy (mean: 30.7, SD = 5) than non-users (mean: 28.3, SD = 6). Stratified analyses indicate that the association between digital health literacy and wearable use varies by age group, with significant positive association observed in older age groups (OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.07 in age group 18-40; OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.12 in age group 41-64; OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.19 in age group 65+). Mediation analysis indicated that digital health literacy partially mediates the relationship between age and wearable use (indirect effect: coefficient = -0.0156, 95% CI: -0.0244 to -0.00791, p <.001).
This study indicates sociodemographic disparities in wearable use among the German population and differences in digital health literacy between wearable users and non-users. A generational divide in wearable use was identified, with older adults being less likely to embrace this technology. This was especially true for older adults with lower digital health literacy. Future public health initiatives employing health technologies should take SDoH and DDoH into consideration to ensure effective and equitable impacts.
可穿戴技术有促进健康和预防疾病的潜力。然而,健康的社会决定因素(SDoH)和健康的数字决定因素(DDoH)在这方面如何发挥作用仍不清楚。
本研究调查可穿戴设备使用者和非使用者在社会人口学因素和数字健康素养方面的差异,与可穿戴设备使用的关联是否因年龄组而异及其潜在中介因素。
2022年11月,在德国成年互联网用户小组中进行了一项全国性横断面电话调查。评估内容包括自我报告的可穿戴设备使用情况、社会人口学因素(性别、年龄、教育程度、家庭规模和收入以及居住地区)和数字健康素养(用电子健康素养量表eHEALS测量)。在总样本和按年龄组分层的情况下,使用二项逻辑回归模型分析可穿戴设备使用、社会人口学因素和数字健康素养之间的关联,并进行补充中介分析,将数字健康素养作为年龄与可穿戴设备使用关系的中介因素。
总体而言,24%(223/932)的参与者(52%为男性,平均年龄55.6岁)报告使用可穿戴设备促进健康。65岁及以上、教育程度较低、居住在1 - 2人家庭、家庭收入低于平均水平以及居住在较小城市或前东德地区的参与者中,可穿戴设备的使用率较低。老年组(18 - 40岁:36%;41 - 64岁:26%;65岁及以上:14%)的可穿戴设备使用普及率显著较低。可穿戴设备使用者报告的数字健康素养水平(平均:30.7,标准差 = 5)高于非使用者(平均:28.3,标准差 = 6)。分层分析表明,数字健康素养与可穿戴设备使用之间的关联因年龄组而异,在老年组中观察到显著的正相关(18 - 40岁年龄组:OR = 1.00,95%置信区间:0.94至1.07;41 - 64岁年龄组:OR = 1.07,95%置信区间:1.03至1.12;65岁及以上年龄组:OR = 1.11,95%置信区间:1.04至1.19)。中介分析表明,数字健康素养部分中介了年龄与可穿戴设备使用之间的关系(间接效应:系数 = -0.0156,95%置信区间:-0.0244至-0.00791,p <.001)。
本研究表明德国人群在可穿戴设备使用方面存在社会人口学差异,可穿戴设备使用者和非使用者在数字健康素养方面存在差异。确定了可穿戴设备使用方面的代际差异,老年人采用这项技术的可能性较小。对于数字健康素养较低的老年人尤其如此。未来采用健康技术的公共卫生举措应考虑SDoH和DDoH,以确保产生有效和公平的影响。