• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对澳大利亚医疗系统中剖宫产率不断上升的问题:一种识别利益相关者观点的系统科学方法。

Addressing the Increasing Rate of Caesarean Sections in an Australian Healthcare System: A Systems Science Approach to Identify Stakeholder Perspectives.

作者信息

O'Halloran Siobhan, Perlen Susan, Chapman Anna, Luba Sominsky, Dawson Samantha L, Cusworth Rachael, Alston Laura, Vasilevski Vidanka, Sweet Linda, Vuillermin Peter, Hutchinson Alison M

机构信息

School of Medicine, Institute for Mental Health and Clinical Translation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Sep;27(3):e70220. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70220.

DOI:10.1111/nhs.70220
PMID:40923346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12418297/
Abstract

Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing globally. We aimed to understand stakeholders' perspectives on factors driving CS in pregnancy care to inform areas for intervention. Stakeholders from five health services participated in three Group Model Building workshops to identify the drivers of CS and intervention opportunities. A Causal Loop Diagram was developed to identify priority action areas. Workshop transcripts were thematically analyzed to understand the factors influencing CS rates and to identify areas for interventions to improve CS decision-making. Participants identified 29 drivers that were grouped into four priority areas for action: mothers' health and confidence, clinicians providing care, clinical monitoring and intervention, and health system issues. Five major themes emerged from the transcripts: health system issues, maternal factors, clinical factors, clinical management, and guidelines and adherence. Intervention ideas included: feedback data use across health services, improving the quality of data, and modifying data entry prompts. The factors driving CS rates related to clinicians, maternal service users, the health system, and the health service. A standardized audit and feedback tool to assess, monitor, and compare CS rates within health systems may address CS overuse.

摘要

全球剖宫产率正在上升。我们旨在了解利益相关者对孕期护理中推动剖宫产因素的看法,以为干预领域提供参考。来自五个卫生服务机构的利益相关者参加了三次群体模型构建研讨会,以确定剖宫产的驱动因素和干预机会。绘制了因果循环图以确定优先行动领域。对研讨会记录进行了主题分析,以了解影响剖宫产率的因素,并确定改善剖宫产决策的干预领域。参与者确定了29个驱动因素,这些因素被分为四个优先行动领域:母亲的健康和信心、提供护理的临床医生、临床监测和干预以及卫生系统问题。记录中出现了五个主要主题:卫生系统问题、产妇因素、临床因素、临床管理以及指南与依从性。干预想法包括:跨卫生服务机构使用反馈数据、提高数据质量以及修改数据录入提示。推动剖宫产率上升的因素与临床医生、孕产妇服务使用者、卫生系统和卫生服务有关。一种用于评估、监测和比较卫生系统内剖宫产率的标准化审计和反馈工具可能有助于解决剖宫产的过度使用问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e6/12418297/e06501694d43/NHS-27-e70220-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e6/12418297/571c4cf50789/NHS-27-e70220-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e6/12418297/e06501694d43/NHS-27-e70220-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e6/12418297/571c4cf50789/NHS-27-e70220-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e6/12418297/e06501694d43/NHS-27-e70220-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Addressing the Increasing Rate of Caesarean Sections in an Australian Healthcare System: A Systems Science Approach to Identify Stakeholder Perspectives.应对澳大利亚医疗系统中剖宫产率不断上升的问题:一种识别利益相关者观点的系统科学方法。
Nurs Health Sci. 2025 Sep;27(3):e70220. doi: 10.1111/nhs.70220.
2
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
Acupuncture or acupressure for induction of labour.针刺或指压引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 17;10(10):CD002962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002962.pub4.
5
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jun 15(6):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub2.
6
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
7
Analysis of deliveries using the Robson Classification System in a Brazilian hospital: a cross-sectional observational study.巴西一家医院使用罗布森分类系统对分娩情况进行的分析:一项横断面观察性研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2025 Dec;45(1):2522867. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2025.2522867. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
8
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
9
Chewing gum for enhancing early recovery of bowel function after caesarean section.剖宫产术后嚼口香糖促进肠道功能早期恢复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD011562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011562.pub2.
10
Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.门诊环境中引产的药物和机械干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD007701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007701.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Midwives' perspectives on women's dietary intake during pregnancy: A systems thinking approach.助产士对孕期女性饮食摄入的看法:一种系统思维方法。
Midwifery. 2025 Jul;146:104396. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104396. Epub 2025 Mar 28.
2
Understanding Perinatal Mental Health: A Systems Science Approach to Identify Common Drivers and Opportunities for Intervention.理解围产期心理健康:一种识别常见驱动因素和干预机会的系统科学方法。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(1):e70005. doi: 10.1111/inm.70005.
3
Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.
产妇要求剖宫产:瑞典一项与共享决策和以患者为中心的护理相关的冲突定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jul 2;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01831-z.
4
Applying Systems Thinking to Improve a Hospital Food Retail Environment.运用系统思维改善医院食品零售环境。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2024 Aug;56(8):569-578. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2024.04.005. Epub 2024 May 16.
5
Women's views and experiences of a new Midwifery Group Practice model in rural Australia.澳大利亚农村地区新的助产士小组实践模式下妇女的观点和经验。
Women Birth. 2024 Jul;37(4):101603. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101603. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
6
Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women.导乐连续性护理模式与其他产妇照护模式的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub6.
7
The common drivers of children and young people's health and wellbeing across 13 local government areas: a systems view.13 个地方政府区域内儿童和青少年健康与福利的共同驱动因素:系统视角。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 19;24(1):847. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18354-8.
8
System interventions to support rural access to maternity care: an analysis of the rural surgical obstetrical networks program.系统干预以支持农村获得产妇保健服务:农村外科产科网络方案分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 29;23(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05898-7.
9
Behavioural factors associated with fear of litigation as a driver for the increased use of caesarean sections: a scoping review.与诉讼恐惧相关的行为因素是剖宫产增加的驱动因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 19;13(4):e070454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070454.
10
Midwifery continuity of care: A scoping review of where, how, by whom and for whom?助产护理的连续性:关于地点、方式、实施者及受益对象的范围综述
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 5;2(10):e0000935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000935. eCollection 2022.