• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MOPTIM MRT-200验光设备与2WIN及Retinomax的对比验证

Comparative Validation of MOPTIM MRT-200 Refraction Device with 2WIN and Retinomax.

作者信息

Schumacher Heidi, Garaygay Giancarlo, Ayagalria Aana, Lauano Bryant Ikaika, Marshall Denise M, Townley J Richard, Arnold Robert W

机构信息

Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children's EYE & Strabismus, Anchorage, Alaska, 99508, USA.

Service High School, Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep 2;19:3153-3166. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S545397. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S545397
PMID:40927115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12415116/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Portable sphero-cylinder refraction is useful for remote medical missions and self-checking. A novel, inexpensive, handheld optical scope with an internal vision chart and adjustable diopter lens, called the Moptim MRT-200, was therefore validated.

METHODS

Young, capable patients from a pediatric eye practice had dry refraction estimates with the Moptim MRT-200, Adaptica 2WIN photoscreener, and Monocular Retinomax compared with actual refined retinoscopy. Vector-converted sphero-cylinder refractions and the univariate ABCD Ellipsoid were used for comparison as well as monocular visual acuity.

RESULTS

206 racially diverse, high-risk refractive patients with median "Ellipsoid-Gap" of 3.5 had high correlation spherical equivalent and similar ABCD Ellipsoid comparing Moptim MRT-200, 2WIN and Retinomax (Kruskal Wallis X(5) = 4.2, p = 0.52) however the 61 patients with blur associated with Ellipsoid gap over 5.0 had better refractive accuracy with 2WIN and Retinomax than Moptim MRT-200 (p < 0.001). Visual acuity with Moptim MRT-200 had a weak correlation (ICC.41 AND.47) and a Bland-Altman mean difference of approximately 1 logMAR line less fine than the actual phoropter refraction.

CONCLUSION

Precise sphero-cylinder estimation with the Moptim MRT-200 was too complex for lay screeners and many young patients, especially compared to 2WIN and Retinomax; however, rapid estimation of spherical refraction was feasible and valid.

摘要

背景

便携式球柱面验光仪对远程医疗任务和自我检查很有用。因此,一种名为Moptim MRT - 200的新型、廉价、带有内部视力表和可调节屈光度镜片的手持式光学仪器得到了验证。

方法

来自儿科眼科诊所的年轻且有能力的患者,使用Moptim MRT - 200、Adaptica 2WIN照片筛选仪和单眼视网膜镜进行验光,并与实际的精确视网膜检影法进行比较。使用矢量转换的球柱面验光结果和单变量ABCD椭球体进行比较,同时也比较单眼视力。

结果

206名种族多样、高风险屈光不正患者的“椭球体间隙”中位数为3.5,比较Moptim MRT - 200、2WIN和视网膜镜时,球镜等效值具有高度相关性,且ABCD椭球体相似(Kruskal Wallis X(5) = 4.2,p = 0.52);然而,61名与椭球体间隙超过5.0相关的模糊患者,使用2WIN和视网膜镜时的屈光准确性优于Moptim MRT - 200(p < 0.001)。Moptim MRT - 200的视力相关性较弱(组内相关系数ICC为0.41和0.47),且Bland - Altman平均差异比实际验光仪验光大约低1个logMAR行。

结论

对于非专业筛查人员和许多年轻患者来说,使用Moptim MRT - 200进行精确的球柱面验光过于复杂,尤其是与2WIN和视网膜镜相比;然而,快速估计球镜屈光度数是可行且有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/cb0cc062a9cc/OPTH-19-3153-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/c57a07b93300/OPTH-19-3153-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/a32ede1f9330/OPTH-19-3153-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/9ae91feff992/OPTH-19-3153-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/b4d2afbed232/OPTH-19-3153-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/85f1c434beae/OPTH-19-3153-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/1d47d0efcd0d/OPTH-19-3153-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/eea33c4f695f/OPTH-19-3153-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/cb0cc062a9cc/OPTH-19-3153-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/c57a07b93300/OPTH-19-3153-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/a32ede1f9330/OPTH-19-3153-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/9ae91feff992/OPTH-19-3153-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/b4d2afbed232/OPTH-19-3153-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/85f1c434beae/OPTH-19-3153-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/1d47d0efcd0d/OPTH-19-3153-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/eea33c4f695f/OPTH-19-3153-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/323c/12415116/cb0cc062a9cc/OPTH-19-3153-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative Validation of MOPTIM MRT-200 Refraction Device with 2WIN and Retinomax.MOPTIM MRT-200验光设备与2WIN及Retinomax的对比验证
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep 2;19:3153-3166. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S545397. eCollection 2025.
2
Ellipsoid Spectacle Comparison of Plusoptix, Retinomax and 2WIN Autorefractors.Plusoptix、Retinomax和2WIN自动验光仪的椭球体视镜比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 30;15:3637-3648. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S326680. eCollection 2021.
3
Performance of the 2WIN Photoscreener With "CR" Strabismus Estimation in High-Risk Patients.2WIN 照片筛查仪在“CR”斜视估计高危患者中的表现。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov;207:195-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 May 9.
4
A comparative study and review of visual outcomes with enhanced versus standard monofocal intraocular lenses following cataract surgery.白内障手术后增强型与标准单焦点人工晶状体视觉效果的比较研究与综述
Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2025 Jul 31;14(2):28-39. doi: 10.51329/mehdiophthal1521. eCollection 2025 Summer.
5
Comparative analysis of cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refraction techniques for assessing refractive error in adults: a population-based study.用于评估成人屈光不正的睫状肌麻痹验光和非睫状肌麻痹验光技术的比较分析:一项基于人群的研究
Clin Exp Optom. 2025 Jul 30:1-14. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2025.2537220.
6
Comparison of Spot Vision Screener and Tabletop Autorefractometer with Retinoscopy in the Pediatric Population.小儿群体中Spot视力筛查仪和桌面式自动验光仪与视网膜检影法的比较
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 19;54(2):56-62. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.93607.
7
Community screening for visual impairment in older people.老年人视力障碍的社区筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 20;2(2):CD001054. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001054.pub3.
8
Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.双眼视刺激或常规遮盖治疗法治疗 3-8 岁儿童单眼弱视的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 7;2(2):CD011347. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011347.pub3.
9
Ametropia detection using a novel, compact wavefront autorefractor.利用新型紧凑型波前相差自动验光仪检测屈光不正。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Mar;44(2):311-320. doi: 10.1111/opo.13263. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
10
Optimizing scleral lens prescriptions: a comparison of algorithmic and conventional refraction and over-refraction in irregular corneas.优化巩膜镜处方:不规则角膜中算法验光与传统验光及复验法的比较
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2025 Aug 10:102485. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2025.102485.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Self-Test Refraction, Autorefraction, and Subjective Refraction.自测验光、自动验光与主观验光的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 28;19:1085-1092. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S510850. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of the PlenOptika QuickSee Free Portable Autorefractor in Schools in The Gambia.在冈比亚学校对PlenOptika QuickSee Free便携式自动验光仪的评估。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2025 Mar-Apr;62(2):122-127. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20241105-03. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Comparison of the PlusoptiX A16 and vision screener V100.
PlusoptiX A16与视力筛查仪V100的比较。
Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 26;4:1414417. doi: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1414417. eCollection 2024.
4
Comparison of photorefraction by Plusoptix A12 and cycloplegic autorefraction in children.比较 Plusoptix A12 光觉折射仪与睫状肌麻痹自动验光仪在儿童中的应用。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03459-w.
5
Pre-Cycloplegic Exam Benefit of Photoscreening and Accommodation-Relaxing Skiascopy.散瞳前检查中光筛检法和调节放松检影法的益处
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 15;18:833-846. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S454430. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparative Validation of PlusoptiX and AI-Optic Photoscreeners in Children with High Amblyopia Risk Factor Prevalence.PlusoptiX与人工智能光学视力筛查仪在高弱视风险因素患病率儿童中的比较验证
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug 16;16:2639-2650. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S378777. eCollection 2022.
7
Ellipsoid Spectacle Comparison of Plusoptix, Retinomax and 2WIN Autorefractors.Plusoptix、Retinomax和2WIN自动验光仪的椭球体视镜比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Aug 30;15:3637-3648. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S326680. eCollection 2021.
8
Investigation of the Accuracy of a Low-Cost, Portable Autorefractor to Provide Well-Tolerated Eyeglass Prescriptions: A Randomized Crossover Trial.低成本、便携式自动验光仪提供可耐受眼镜处方的准确性研究:一项随机交叉试验。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Dec;128(12):1672-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.030. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
9
Comparing School-Aged Refraction Measurements Using the 2WIN-S Portable Refractor in Relation to Cycloplegic Retinoscopy: A Cross-Sectional Study.使用2WIN-S便携式验光仪与睫状肌麻痹视网膜检影法比较学龄儿童的屈光测量:一项横断面研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2021 May 21;2021:6612476. doi: 10.1155/2021/6612476. eCollection 2021.
10
2020 Evaluation of Portable Vision Screening Instruments.2020 年便携式视力筛查仪器评估。
Yale J Biol Med. 2021 Mar 31;94(1):107-114. eCollection 2021 Mar.