• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“划船助力”:在加拿大四个省份实施和评估长期护理中的强化姑息治疗方法项目

"Help with rowing the boat": Implementing and evaluating the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long-Term Care program in four Canadian provinces.

作者信息

Kaasalainen Sharon, Thompson Genevieve, McCleary Lynn, Venturato Lorraine, Wickson-Griffiths Abigail, Hunter Paulette V, Sussman Tamara, Li Donny, Sinclair Shane, Hadjistavropoulos Thomas, Akhtar-Danesh Noori, Bourgeois-Guerin Valerie, Parker Deborah

机构信息

School of Nursing, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

College of Nursing, Max Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Sep 7;19:26323524251369121. doi: 10.1177/26323524251369121. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1177/26323524251369121
PMID:40927412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12415342/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite high mortality rates in long-term care (LTC), LTC homes continue to struggle to implement a palliative approach to care.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this research was to implement and evaluate the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long-Term Care (SPA-LTC; www.spaltc.ca) program. Specifically, we explored its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects on resident comfort, use of emergency department at end-of-life (EOL), and location of resident death.

DESIGN

This study used an explanatory mixed method design in four LTC homes; one in each of four provinces (Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta) in Canada to assess acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary effects of the program.

METHODS

Quantitative and qualitative data were collected whereby the qualitative component was used to help explain or elaborate on the main quantitative components.

RESULTS

Of the 102 participating residents, 74.5% (76/102) had a Palliative Care Conference (PCC). However, of those who died, only 68.8% of them had a PCC. Rates of hospital use were reduced for study participants in terms of emergency department visits at EOL (relative risk reduction (RRR): 46%; 95% CI: -1.12, -0.10) and hospital deaths (RRR: 88%; 95% CI: -4.06, -1.12) compared to baseline. However, there were no significant differences in resident comfort. Family members stated that the PCCs were informative and thought that good communication was critical in providing quality care. They highlighted that close relationships and mutual respect among staff, residents, and families led to more meaningful care while the resident was alive as well as into bereavement. Staff stated that they found the SPA-LTC resources helpful and recognized the importance of having strong leadership using a Palliative Champion Team.

CONCLUSION

The SPA-LTC program appears to be feasible on some key activities and supports a family-centered approach to care, which relies on strong communication. Future research is needed to confirm these initial results.

摘要

背景

尽管长期护理(LTC)中的死亡率很高,但长期护理机构仍在努力实施姑息治疗方法。

目的

本研究的目的是实施并评估长期护理中的强化姑息治疗方法(SPA-LTC;www.spaltc.ca)项目。具体而言,我们探讨了其可行性、可接受性以及对居民舒适度、临终时急诊科的使用情况和居民死亡地点的初步影响。

设计

本研究在四个长期护理机构中采用了解释性混合方法设计;加拿大四个省份(安大略省、曼尼托巴省、萨斯喀彻温省、艾伯塔省)各有一个机构,以评估该项目的可接受性、可行性和初步效果。

方法

收集了定量和定性数据,其中定性部分用于帮助解释或详细说明主要的定量部分。

结果

在102名参与研究的居民中,74.5%(76/102)参加了姑息治疗会议(PCC)。然而,在那些去世的居民中,只有68.8%的人参加了PCC。与基线相比,研究参与者在临终时的急诊科就诊次数(相对风险降低(RRR):46%;95%置信区间:-1.12,-0.10)和医院死亡人数(RRR:88%;95%置信区间:-4.06,-1.12)方面的医院使用率有所降低。然而,居民舒适度方面没有显著差异。家庭成员表示,姑息治疗会议提供了丰富的信息,并认为良好的沟通对于提供优质护理至关重要。他们强调,工作人员、居民和家庭之间密切的关系和相互尊重会在居民生前以及丧亲期间带来更有意义的护理。工作人员表示,他们发现SPA-LTC资源很有帮助,并认识到通过姑息治疗冠军团队发挥强有力领导作用的重要性。

结论

SPA-LTC项目在一些关键活动上似乎是可行的,并支持以家庭为中心的护理方法,这种方法依赖于强有力的沟通。需要进一步的研究来证实这些初步结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff0b/12415342/112f878d50a1/10.1177_26323524251369121-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff0b/12415342/f273ce9d308b/10.1177_26323524251369121-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff0b/12415342/112f878d50a1/10.1177_26323524251369121-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff0b/12415342/f273ce9d308b/10.1177_26323524251369121-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff0b/12415342/112f878d50a1/10.1177_26323524251369121-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
"Help with rowing the boat": Implementing and evaluating the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long-Term Care program in four Canadian provinces.“划船助力”:在加拿大四个省份实施和评估长期护理中的强化姑息治疗方法项目
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Sep 7;19:26323524251369121. doi: 10.1177/26323524251369121. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints for older people in all long-term care settings.预防和减少所有长期护理环境中老年人使用身体约束的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD007546. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007546.pub3.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
8
Palliative care interventions in advanced dementia.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 2;12(12):CD011513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011513.pub2.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative End-of-Life Medication Prescribing Rates in Long-Term Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.长期护理中临终姑息治疗药物处方率:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2024 Mar;25(3):532-538.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2023.11.026. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
The impact of the mySupport advance care planning intervention on family caregivers' perceptions of decision-making and care for nursing home residents with dementia: pretest-posttest study in six countries.MySupport 预先医疗照护计划干预对护理院痴呆患者家属决策和护理认知的影响:六国的预试验后测试研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Mar 1;52(3). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad027.
3
Outcomes of advance care directives after admission to a long-term care home: DNR the DNH?
长期护理院入院后预先医疗指示的结果:不复苏?不治疗?
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02699-5.
4
Evaluating the Implementation of the Conversation Starter Kit in Long Term Care.评估对话启动工具包在长期护理中的实施情况。
SAGE Open Nurs. 2021 Nov 1;7:23779608211051824. doi: 10.1177/23779608211051824. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Barriers and facilitators to optimal supportive end-of-life palliative care in long-term care facilities: a qualitative descriptive study of community-based and specialist palliative care physicians' experiences, perceptions and perspectives.长期护理机构中最佳支持性临终姑息治疗的障碍和促进因素:一项基于社区和专科姑息治疗医生的经验、看法和观点的定性描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 5;10(8):e037466. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037466.
6
A pilot evaluation of the Strengthening a Palliative Approach in Long-Term Care (SPA-LTC) program.长期护理中强化舒缓治疗方法(SPA-LTC)项目的初步评估。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Jul 13;19(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00599-w.
7
The Impact of Prior Advance Care Planning Documentation on End-of-Life Care Provision in Long-Term Care.既往预先护理计划文件对长期护理中临终关怀提供的影响。
Can Geriatr J. 2020 May 1;23(2):172-183. doi: 10.5770/cgj.23.386. eCollection 2020 Jun.
8
The relationship between caregivers' perceptions of end-of-life care in long-term care and a good resident death.长期护理中照顾者对终末关怀的看法与居民善终之间的关系。
Palliat Support Care. 2020 Dec;18(6):683-690. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000292.
9
Overall mortality and causes of death in newly admitted nursing home residents.新入住养老院居民的总体死亡率和死亡原因。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Feb;32(2):275-280. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01441-x. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
10
Evaluating the implementation of the PACE Steps to Success Programme in long-term care facilities in seven countries according to the RE-AIM framework.根据 RE-AIM 框架评估 PACE 成功计划在七个国家的长期护理设施中的实施情况。
Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 19;14(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0953-8.